Rethinking invasive strategies in old patients with NSTEMI

Authors

  • Muhammad Haroon-Ul-Rasheed CMH Multan Institute of Medical Sciences, National University of Medical Sciences, Multan, Pakistan
  • Rohma Aftab CMH Multan Institute of Medical Sciences, National University of Medical Sciences, Multan, Pakistan
  • Laibah Gulzar 4th Year MBBS Student, Shifa College of Medicine, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.22216

Keywords:

NSTEMI, Acute myocardial infarction (AMI), Conservative treatment

Abstract

Dear Sir/Madam,

Cardiovascular diseases are a leading cause of mortality worldwide, in the year 2021 they made up nearly one-third of the deaths globally. (1) Developing countries, such as Pakistan, face a serious challenge when it comes to dealing with the burden of cardiovascular diseases. According to the 2019 Global Burden of Disease, Pakistan's age-standardized mortality rate was 357.88 per 100,000, which was greater than the Global average of  239.85 per 100,000, and its age-standardized incidence of CVD was 918.18 per 100,000  which was also greater than the Global average of 684.33 per 100,000. (2)

A study conducted in the United States accomplished that over the past years, the incidence of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in patients has been increasing compared to the number of patients who presented with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).(3) Compared to STEMI patients, NSTEMI patients utilized greater medical resources. Hospitalizations for NSTEMI patients were 26% greater, and Emergency room visits were 52% greater in comparison to individuals with STEMI. (4) Individuals with NSTEMI also had numerous other complications and were older in general. Compared to STEMI patients, NSTEMI patients experienced higher rates of overall mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and death from cardiovascular causes. (4)

According to a recent study, where a randomized trial was carried out across the United Kingdom, concluded that there was no significant difference in mortality or nonfatal myocardial infarction over the next 4.1 years when opting for a cheaper conservative approach by using medicines while treating patients with NSTEMI over a much more costly invasive approach. (5)

In the case of Pakistan, the fifth most populated country in the world. Regional conflicts, natural disasters, and low government spending on healthcare have impeded health development despite the economic expansion. One of the increasing non-communicable diseases that our healthcare sector is now battling is cardiovascular disease.(2) Considering a conservative approach while managing NSTEMI in older persons can greatly reduce expenditures without compromising the patient’s health. Invasive procedures like percutaneous coronary intervention and cardiac catheterization put a great toll on our healthcare system, this approach to employing conservative management can enable us to improve our resource allocation to the other fields, while not affecting the outcomes for old patients with NSTEMI.

---Continue

Published

2025-04-27

How to Cite

Haroon-Ul-Rasheed, M., Aftab, R., & Gulzar, L. (2025). Rethinking invasive strategies in old patients with NSTEMI. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 75(05), 846–847. https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.22216

Issue

Section

LETTER TO THE EDITOR