Comparative mydriatic study: tropicamide vs. biosimilar in normal and diabetic patients with quality control analysis

Authors

  • Fareena Farooqui Department of Pharmacology, Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Sohaib Zafar Malik Department of Pharmacology, Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3454-4802

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.20295

Keywords:

Tropicamide, Biosimilar drug, Diabetic

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of tropicamide and its biosimilar drug in normal and diabetic patients.

Method: The prospective cohort study was conducted at Amanat Eye Hospital on March 5, 2023 to 5 December, 2023, and comprised individuals aged 40-50 years. Diabetic patients formed group A, while healthy controls were in group B. Tropicamide 1% was used for mydriasis in the left eye of all the subjects, and a biosimilar drug was used for mydriasis in the right eye. After administration, the size of the pupil was analysed. Data was analysed using Paired t-tests for continuous variables and McNemar’s test for categorical variables.

Results: Of the 300 subjects (150 males, 150 females), 150(50%) were in each of the two groups. In group B, 29(19.33%) eyes were perfectly dilated in response to tropicamide compared to 23(15.43%) with biosimilar drug. In group A, the corresponding values were 53(35.33%) and 25(16.66%), respectively.

Conclusion: Tropicamide was found to be more effective compared to its biosimilar drug. Besides, tropicamide was more effective in healthy individuals compared to diabetic individuals.

Key Words: Tropicamide, Biosimilar drug, Diabetic.

Published

2025-06-01

How to Cite

Farooqui, F., & Sohaib Zafar Malik. (2025). Comparative mydriatic study: tropicamide vs. biosimilar in normal and diabetic patients with quality control analysis. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 74(06), 902–907. https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.20295

Issue

Section

RESEARCH ARTICLE