Does concurrent pelvic organ prolapse surgery affect outcomes of mid-urethral Sling? A tertiary care experience Authors Samia Aijaz Department of Urogynaecology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan Urooj Kashif Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan Novera Chughtai Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan Summera Malik Department of Urogynaecology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan DOI: https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.11394 Keywords: Concurrent surgery, Pelvic organ prolapse, Mid-urethral sling, Treatment outcome, Survey and questionnaires Abstract Objective: To compare the efficacy of mid-urethral sling surgery with and without concurrent pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Method: The retrospective chart review was conducted in May 2022 at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, and comprised data of female patients who underwent mid-urethral sling surgery either through tension-free vaginal tape or trans obturator tape for stress urinary incontinence between January 2010 and December 2020 and had a complete 12-month follow-up data available. Two groups were formed: Group Ahad mid-urethral sling surgery cases, while Group B, had cases who had concurrent mid-urethral sling and pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Documented parameters, including preoperative data, postoperative complications and satisfaction levels using urogenital distress inventory-6 and incontinence impact questionnaire-7 tools, were compared between the groups. Negative cough stress test was defined as objective cure. Data was analysed using SPSS 19. Results: Of the 345 females, 122(35.4%) were in Group A, with 68(55.7%) aged <50 years. There were 223(64.6%) females in Group B, with 127(57%) aged >50 years(p>0.05). Parity >3 and menopause were significantly higher in Group B (p<0.05), but a positive preoperative cough stress test was high in Group A (p=0.001). At 12-month follow-up, objective and subjective cure rates were not significantly different between the groups (p>0.05). However, at 6 months, urogenital distress inventory-6 scores were significant between the groups (p<0.05). Body mass index was associated with objective failure at 6months. Mid-urethral sling type and the presence of concurrent prolapse surgery had no significant effect (p>0.05). Conclusion: Undergoing simultaneous prolapse surgery and mid-urethral sling surgery had similar risks and success rates as undergoing mid-urethral sling surgery alone. Key Words: Concurrent surgery, Pelvic organ prolapse, Mid-urethral sling, Treatment outcome, Survey and questionnaires. Downloads Full Text Article Published 2025-08-01 How to Cite Aijaz, S., Kashif, U., Chughtai, N., & Malik, S. (2025). Does concurrent pelvic organ prolapse surgery affect outcomes of mid-urethral Sling? A tertiary care experience. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 75(8), 1188–1193. https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.11394 More Citation Formats ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver Download Citation Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX Issue Vol. 75 No. 8 (2025): AUGUST Section RESEARCH ARTICLE License Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.