By Author
  By Title
  By Keywords

October 2020, Volume 70, Issue 10

Research Articles

Quantitative influence of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction on CT image histology of patients with primary colorectal cancer

Authors: Yue Chen  ( Department of Radiology, Jingzhou Central Hospital Jingzhou, China. )
Wei Li  ( Department of Ultrasound, Jingzhou Central Hospital Jingzhou, China. )
Sibin Liu  ( Department of Radiology, Jingzhou Central Hospital Jingzhou, China. )


Objective: To investigate the quantitative influence of ASIR (adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction) on CT(computed tomography) image histology of patients with primary colorectal cancer.

Methods: Sixty three patients with primary colorectal cancer were prospectively selected in the Jingzhou Central Hospital from January 2017 to December 2018; all patients were planned for contrast-enhanced CT examination and 20% ASIR incremental reconstruction. For reasons of interest, single- and multi-slice scans and radio-histological analysis were performed: ASIR effects were calculated by multilevel linear regression method.

Results: The total of 56 CT data sets were collected and analyzed. Incremental ASIR levels showed significant statistical changes in most radiohistological features (P<0.05). Single event and multilevel analysis of first-order statistical characteristics showed relatively small changes (median standardization effect B = 0.08). The change level of second-order statistical characteristics in single-level analysis (median B = 0.36) were significantly higher than multilevel analysis (median B = 0.13). The fractal characteristics showed significant statistical changes only in single-level analysis (median B = 0.49).

Conclusion: The incremental level of ASIR can significantly affect the quantification of CT radiohistology of primary colorectal cancer. The second-order statistical and fractal characteristics obtained by single-level analysis can be more variable than those obtained by multi-level analysis.

Keywords: Computer tomography, Image processing, Colorectal neoplasms, Classification. (JPMA 70: 78 [Special Issue]; 2020)




Radiomics have improved the accuracy of cancer diagnosis and classification. They have been gradually applied in analysing the clinical features, prediction of prognosis, therapeutic scheme making and therapeutic effect evaluation of multiple malignant tumours including non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer and prostatic cancer.1 Computed tomography (CT) technology has obtained continuous optimization and development in recent years. Iterative image reconstruction algorithm can control image noise while lowering radiation dosage.2 Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) mainly regards image information gained from filtered back projection as the basis of iterative reconstruction to gain better image quality. Meanwhile, it can reduce 30%-65% of radiological dose and image quality without any obvious loss.3 At present, the reconstructed images gained for CT imaging research are mostly based on pure filtered back-projection technique. Iterative reconstruction technique has been widely applied in CT scanners. The influence of iterative reconstruction algorithm on quantitative image features is closely related to radiomics.4,5 The authors infer that compared with pure filtered back projection technique, ASIR can lead to a significant change of imaging characteristics. In the meantime, as the increment percentage of ASIR increases, such change is more significant. This study aims to explore the effect of ASIR on CT radiomics quantification in patients with primary colorectal cancer, in the hope of providing more reference for follow-up CT imageological examination and result judgement.


Patients and Methods


Sixty three patients with primary colorectal cancer treated in Jingzhou Central Hospital, China from January 2017 to December 2017 were prospectively selected Inclusion criteria were patients diagnosed with primary colorectal cancer by pathological and imageological examination, had received contrast enhanced CT examination and age between 18-75 years. Exclusion criteria were diameter of tumour<2 cm, glomerular filtration rate<50 ml/minute, allergic to iodinated contrast agent and incomplete data. The study proposal was approved by the Ethics Committee of the hospital, and both patients and their family members signed the informed consent form.

Through contrast-enhanced CT examination and 20% ASIR incremental reconstruction, the tumour area of interest were selected to complete single-layer and multi-layer scan, and the multilevel linear regression method was used to calculate ASIR effect.

The CT image acquisition and reconstruction was acquired by Philips Brilliance 64 CT scanner produced by Philips. Dynamic contrast enhanced scanning was performed. The specific parameters used were as follows: 100 kV; 75 mAs; Z axis coverage 4 cm; scanning field of view 50 cm; matrix 512×512 mm; reconstruction thickness 5 mm; acquisition points of time 35; intravenous administration of 20 mg scopolamine; injection of 50 ml ioversol 320 as the contrast agent at the speed of 5 ml/s, and injection of 50ml normal saline at the same speed; average CTDIVol (138.14±15.74)mGy, and average DLP (552.78±62.13)mGy. When ASIR percentage is 0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, 80% and 100% respectively, reconstruction dynamics of the scanner is acquired, and the independent dataset is established respectively.

Image analysis was completed by two intermediate or above radiologists who reached a consensus. The enhancement peak of the tumour was scanned by CT to maximize tutor/noise ratio. When ASIR=0%, ROI area was drawn around the tumour. 2 datasets formed for each patient:1 axial image corresponding to the maximum tumour area; 5 continuous axial images including tumour tissue. When ASIR=20%-100%, ROI which is same with that when ASIR=0% was chosen to complete reconstruction. Matlab software was used to analyze characteristic data of radiomics. Medium smoothing filtering and 32 bin wide filtering were applied to analyze original DICOM images. First-order: histogram; second-order: GLCM (gray level co-occurrence matrix), GLDM (gray level deviation matrix); classification: NGTDM (neighbourhood gray tone difference matrix), GLRL (gray level run length) and GLSZM (gray level size zone matrix) data were obtained.

Statistical analysis was done with SPSS 20.0 software. Measurement data were expressed with (±s). Multilevel linear regression method was used to calculate ASIR effect. Standardization effect (B) was judged by inter-group standard deviation through absolute regression coefficient/ASIR plus 20U, where B value <0.3, 0.3-0.8, >0.8 is judged as small influence, medium influence and large influence, respectively. Inspection level a=0.05. The sample size was calculated according to the incidence rate. The incidence rate of colorectal cancer is 15%, and the sample size was 49 cases. For accuracy the sample was increased by 20%. Finally, 63 patients were enrolled,

n = 2l/[2sin-1(Pmax0.5 )-2sin-1(Pmin0.5)]2.




Among all patients, no tumour was found in 2 patients through CT examination, but later they were diagnosed definitely with colorectal cancer by histopathologic examination. In all 56 CT datasets were analyzed with 2D radiomics and 46 CT datasets were analyzed by 3D radiomics. The average diameter of tumours was (5.73±1.71) cm. There were 8 cases with the tumour in the caecum; 4 cases had the tumour in the ascending colon; 14 cases had the tumor in the sigmoid colon and 30 had the tumour in the rectum. According to CT imageological examination and TNM standards of AJCC/UICC,6 18 cases were in T2 phase; 34 in T3 phase; 4 in T4 phase, 32 in N0 phase; 20 in N1 phase and 4 cases were in N2 phase.

The Radiomics analysis showed absolute regression coefficient, standardization effect B value and corresponding P value of first-order, second-order and classification of 2D and 3D datasets as shown in Table-1.

Classification characteristics of 3D dataset are shown in Table-2.

In 2D radiomics analysis, except GLCM and entropy other first-order, second-order and high-order characteristics present the linear correlation with ASIR value (P<0.05), as shown in Table-2. In 2D radiomics analysis, all first-order characteristics own slight relative effect (median standardization effect B=0.08, 95%CI=0.03-0.26). In second-order characteristics, all GLDM features and most GLCM features own moderate relative effect (median B=0.36, 95%CI=0.01-0.42). Classification features own moderate and high relative effect (median B=0.49, 95% CI=0.26-0.800.

In 3D radiomics analysis, except NGTDM complexity and 13 GLRL characteristics, most first-order, second-order and classification characteristics had correlation with ASIR value (P<0.05), as shown in Table-2. In 3D radiomics analysis, first-order characteristics owned slight relative effect (median B=0.08, 95%CI=0.02-0.28). In 3D radiomics analysis, the relative effect of second-order characteristics was lower than that of 2D radiomics (median B=0.12, 95% CI=0.08-0.33). In 3D radiomics analysis, ASIR effect classification feature was small (median B=0.08, 95% CI=0.02-0.34). In 3D radiomics analysis, classification feature had no correlation with ASIR level (P>0.05).




In recent years, numerous clinical studies have verified the value of radiomics in imageological examination of malignant tumours.7,8 But there is still lack of research about the influence of CT image reconstruction due to the change of filtered back projection technology to hybrid iterative algorithm. This study verified that ASIR increment level could lead to significant changes of first-order, second-order and classification features. Such changes present the linear correlation, and are free from the influence of 2D and 3D analysis. The remarkable changes of classification characteristics can only be seen in 2D dataset, and small changes of first-order characteristics can be seen in all datasets. But, second-order characteristic change of 2D radiomics is more influenced by 3D radiomics.

Image analysis and reconstruction by filtered back projection method is one of key parts of CT examination.9,10 However, it is difficult to interpret image noise through such technology due to statistical variation, so low-dose CT imaging is obviously restricted.11,12 As CT scanning equipment develops and improves, and computing power is enhanced, iterative reconstruction algorithm has started to be widely applied clinically in recent years. The mixed algorithm represented by AISR can improve image quality based on reduction of image noise through the combination of analysis and iterative method.13,14 However, it is necessary to notice that a change related to high AISR enhancement exists in the imaging features,15 so the author infers that AISR can change radiomics features, compared with filtered back projection method and AISR weighting.

Some scholars analyzed the influence of quantitative CT data for different reconstruction algorithms, such as finite histogram and second-order GLCM feature. In this study, filtered back projection method, 50% ASIR and model-based iterative reconstruction method were compared. The patients selected had hepatic pathological changes, or kidney stone, and non-enhanced or enhanced CT scanning was conducted under 120 kVP. The model-based iterative reconstruction method showed the largest influence on imaging features. Significant impacts on the standard deviation of first-order characteristics were generated in 50% ASIR, but there was no obvious influence on other types of first-order features or second-order GLCM features.16 The above research differs from the result of this study, mainly because the research design is different and it assesses overall ASIR increment effect, instead of comparison with other methods for single percentage ASIR.

Reconstruction algorithm is one of numerous factors influencing CT radiomics characteristics, and other factors also include scanning parameters, like kVP, MAS, reconstruction algorithm, gray discretization and contrast ratio.17 The previous studies focus on the influence of reconstruction algorithm on non-enhanced CT imaging characteristics, such as shape, first-order features, second-order features and classification features. The results show that reconstruction algorithm has significant impacts in relevant features. Smooth images have smaller impacts in noisy images. Compared with 2D images, 3D images further own reproducibility. The results of this study also reflect 3D image features which are more stable.18,19

In addition, a study analyzed 238 patients with single pulmonary nodule, including 180 cases with lung cancer and 58 cases with pulmonary benign disease. Researchers analyzed the impacts of the thickness of reconstructed slices, reconstruction algorithm and contrast enhancement on different types of diagnosis performance of radiomics features. The results showed that benign and malignant node identification and classification effect of non-enhanced CT, 1,25 mm thin-layer CT and standard algorithm, could be compared with enhanced CT, 5 mm thick-layer CT and pulmonary reconstruction algorithm, respectively.20 Other studies verified that,21-23 voxel size and dispersion are important factors influencing imaging characteristics, including shape, intensity, GLCM, GLZSM, GLRL, NGTDM, and classification, etc.

In this study, 56 CT datasets were collected and analyzed. The results showed that significant statistical change of ASIR increment level can be seen in most radiomics features (P<0.05). First-order statistical features were analyzed by single particle and 3D imaging, and their change were relatively small (median standardization effect B=0.08). Second-order statistical features were analyzed by 2D imaging (median B=0.36), and the change level was higher than that of 3D imaging (median B=0.13).24-26 Significant statistical change of classification features could be only seen in 2D imaging analysis (median B=0.49), verifying that reconstruction algorithm change, voxel and gray discretization minimization contribute to improving quantification stability of CT radiomics features. But some limitations also exist in this study:  The sample size was too small, but the parameter indexes collected were fixed, including KVP, MAS, reconstruction algorithm and voxel size. Thus, centralized analysis of the influence of reconstruction algorithm could be achieved; the images of other iterative reconstruction algorithms are not assessed in this study, which is mainly because they cannot be acquired in the research process. More in-depth exploration is required in the follow-up.




In conclusion, ASIR increment level can significantly influence CT radiomics quantification of primary colorectal cancer. Second-order statistics and classification features gained by 2D imaging analysis have large change level than those gained by 3D imaging analysis.


Disclaimer: None.

Conflict of Interest: None.

Funding Disclosure: None to declare.




1.      Aerts HJ, Grossmann P, Tan Y, Oxnard GR, Rizvi N, Schwartz LH, et al. Defining a Radiomic Response Phenotype: A Pilot Study using targeted therapy in NSCLC. Sci Rep 2016;6:33860. doi: 10.1038/srep33860.

2.      Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H. Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data. Radiology 2016;278:563-77. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015151169.

3.      Coroller TP, Grossmann P, Hou Y, Rios Velazquez E, Leijenaar RT, Hermann G, et al. CT-based radiomic signature predicts distant metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2015;114:345-50. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.02.015.

4.      Song SH, Park H, Lee G, Lee HY, Sohn I, Kim HS, et al. Imaging Phenotyping Using Radiomics to Predict Micropapillary Pattern within Lung Adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 2017;12:624-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.11.2230.

5.      Parikh J, Selmi M, Charles-Edwards G, Glendenning J, Ganeshan B, Verma H, et al. Changes in primary breast cancer heterogeneity may augment midtreatment MR imaging assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Radiology 2014;272:100-12. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14130569.

6.      Yao HW, Wu HWi, Liu YH. The eighth edition of the Joint Committee on cancer of the United States and its "prognosis and prediction" evaluation system. Chin J Gastrointest Surg 2017:20:24-7.

7.      Cameron A, Khalvati F, Haider MA, Wong A. MAPS: A Quantitative Radiomics Approach for Prostate Cancer Detection. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2016;63:1145-56. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2485779.

8.      Nketiah G, Elschot M, Kim E, Teruel JR, Scheenen TW, Bathen TF, et al. T2-weighted MRI-derived textural features reflect prostate cancer aggressiveness: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 2017;27:3050-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4663-1.

9.      Liang HY, Huang YQ, Yang ZX, Ying-Ding, Zeng MS, Rao SX. Potential of MR histogram analyses for prediction of response to chemotherapy in patients with colorectal hepatic metastases. Eur Radiol 2016;26:2009-18. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4043-2.

10.    Ng F, Ganeshan B, Kozarski R, Miles KA, Goh V. Assessment of primary colorectal cancer heterogeneity by using whole-tumor texture analysis: contrast-enhanced CT texture as a biomarker of 5-year survival. Radiology 2013;266:177-184. doi:10.1148/radiol.12120254

11.    De Cecco CN, Ganeshan B, Ciolina M, Rengo M, Meinel FG, Musio D, et al. Texture analysis as imaging biomarker of tumoral response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer patients studied with 3-T magnetic resonance. Invest Radiol 2015;50:239-45. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000116.

12.    Ahn SJ, Kim JH, Park SJ, Han JK. Prediction of the therapeutic response after FOLFOX and FOLFIRI treatment for patients with liver metastasis from colorectal cancer using computerized CT texture analysis. Eur J Radiol 2016;85:1867-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.08.014.

13.    Jalil O, Afaq A, Ganeshan B, Patel UB, Boone D, Endozo R, et al. Magnetic resonance based texture parameters as potential imaging biomarkers for predicting long-term survival in locally advanced rectal cancer treated by chemoradiotherapy. Colorectal Dis 2017;19:349-62. doi: 10.1111/codi.13496.

14.    Liu M, Lv H, Liu LH, Yang ZH, Jin EH, Wang ZC. Locally advanced rectal cancer: predicting non-responders to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy using apparent diffusion coefficient textures. Int J Colorectal Dis 2017;32:1009-12. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2835-3.

15.    Baker ME, Dong F, Primak A, Obuchowski NA, Einstein D, Gandhi N, et al. Contrast-to-noise ratio and low-contrast object resolution on full- and low-dose MDCT: SAFIRE versus filtered back projection in a low-contrast object phantom and in the liver. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199:8-18. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7421.

16.    Singh S, Kalra MK, Do S, Thibault JB, Pien H, O'Connor OJ, et al. Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2012;36:347-53. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31824e639e.

17.    Deák Z, Grimm JM, Treitl M, Geyer LL, Linsenmaier U, Körner M, et al. Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study. Radiology 2013;266:197-206. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12112707.

18.    Li H, Zhu Y, Burnside ES, Drukker K, Hoadley KA, Fan C, et al. MR Imaging Radiomics Signatures for Predicting the Risk of Breast Cancer Recurrence as Given by Research Versions of MammaPrint, Oncotype DX, and PAM50 Gene Assays. Radiology 2016;281:382-91. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016152110.

19.    Kim JH, Ko ES, Lim Y, Lee KS, Han BK, Ko EY, et al. Breast Cancer Heterogeneity: MR Imaging Texture Analysis and Survival Outcomes. Radiology 2017;282:665-75. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016160261.

20.    Ha S, Park S, Bang JI, Kim EK, Lee HY. Metabolic Radiomics for Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT to Characterize Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: Histopathologic Characteristics, Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, and Prognosis. Sci Rep 2017;7:1556. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01524-7.

21.    Huang Y, Liu Z, He L, Chen X, Pan D, Ma Z, et al. Radiomics Signature: A Potential Biomarker for the Prediction of Disease-Free Survival in Early-Stage (I or II) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Radiology 2016;281:947-57. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016152234.

22.    Li W, Jia MX, Wang JH, Lu JL, Deng J, Tang JX, et al. Association of MMP9-1562C/T and MMP13-77A/G Polymorphisms with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Southern Chinese Population. Biomolecules 2019;9:107. doi: 10.3390/biom9030107.

23.    Lou Y, Guo D, Zhang H, Song L. Effectiveness of mesenchymal stems cells cultured by hanging drop vs. conventional culturing on the repair of hypoxic-ischemic-damaged mouse brains, measured by stemness gene expression. Open Life Sci 2016;11:519-23. DOI 10.1515/biol-2016-0068

24.    Lou Y, Shi J, Guo D, Qureshi AK, Song L. Function of PD-L1 in antitumor immunity of glioma cells. Saudi J Biol Sci 2017;24:803-7. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.06.025.

25.    Lou Y, Yang J, Wang L, Chen X, Xin X, Liu Y. The clinical efficacy study of treatment to Chiari malformation type I with syringomyelia under the minimally invasive surgery of resection of Submeningeal cerebellar Tonsillar Herniation and reconstruction of Cisterna magna. Saudi J Biol Sci 2019;26:1927-31. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.07.012.

26.    Wu JH, Wei W, Zhang L, Wang J, Damaševi?ius R, Li J, et al. Risk assessment of hypertension in steel workers based on LVQ and fisher-SVM deep excavation. IEEE Access 2019;7:23109-19. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2899625.


Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees: