A scoping review of the literature of research ethics committees and ethics review framework in Pakistan: what we know and what we still need to learn Authors Farah Asif Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan Faisal Sultan Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan Iqra Masood Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan Shahtaj Baig Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan Perihan Elif Ekmecki TOBB Economics and Technology University, Ankara, Turkey Vina Vaswani Centre for Ethics, Yenepoya University, India Zulfiqar Bhutta Institute of Global Health and Development, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan Francis Crawley Good Clinical Practice Alliance – Europe (GCPA) & Strategic Initiative for Developing Capacity in Ethical Review (SIDCER), Leuven, Belgium DOI: https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.8033 Keywords: Ethics, Pakistan, Bioethics, Ethics committees, Institutional review board Abstract Objective: To map literature on research ethics committees, institutional review boards and ethics review framework in Pakistan to identify key insights during public health emergencies and normal times. Method: The systematic scoping review was conducted in April 22, and comprised literature search on PubMed, World Health Organisation Global Index Medicus and Summons databases for articles published between January 2005 and February 2022. Information extracted included authors’ names, year of publication, title, study methodology, and key insights under the heads of challenges and solutions. Due to data heterogeneity, key themes were identified and analysed. Results: Of the 2,190 studies initially identified, 21(0.95%) were subjected to full-text review, and, from among them, 9(45%) were analysed in detail. There were 4 key insights identified: research ethics committees and institutional review boards in Pakistan remain unregulated as they are currently not registered or accredited by a competent national-level authority; most members of such committees are not formally trained to implement the mandate; internal and external pressures hinder independent decision-making of such committees; and other issues hindering the functionality and performance of research ethics committees and institutional review boards. Conclusion: Despite existing publications calling for urgent policy and regulatory reforms, there is a dearth of literature and minimal policy actions underline the fact that ethics review remains a neglected area in Pakistan. Key Words: Ethics, Pakistan, Bioethics, Ethics committees, Institutional review board. Downloads Full Text Article Published 2023-07-15 How to Cite Farah Asif, Sultan, F., Masood, I., Baig, S., Ekmecki, P. E., Vaswani, V., Bhutta, Z., & Crawley, F. (2023). A scoping review of the literature of research ethics committees and ethics review framework in Pakistan: what we know and what we still need to learn. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 73(8), 1667–1692. https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.8033 More Citation Formats ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver Download Citation Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX Issue Vol. 73 No. 8 (2023): AUGUST Section Scoping Review License Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.