By Author
  By Title
  By Keywords

March 2020, Volume 70, Issue 3

Original Article

Evaluation of diet as a risk factor in the development of childhood leukaemia: a case control study

Aqeela Ayub  ( Department of Pediatric Medicine, Children Hospital, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan )
Qazi Mumtaz Ahmad  ( Department of Pediatric, Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan )
Tahir Javed  ( M. Islam Medical College, Gujranwala, Pakistan )
Muhammad Zubair Hayat  ( Federal Public Services Commission, Islamabad, Pakistan )
Muhammad Azhar Farooq  ( Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan )
Hafiz Muhammad Zubair Anwar  ( Department of Pediatric Medicine, Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan )
Muhammad Aleem Khan  ( Department of Cardiology, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan. )

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate probable association of dietary risk factors with childhood leukaemia.

Methods: The case-control study was conducted at the Children Hospital, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan, from January to December 2017, and comprised children of either gender aged 2-12 years with recently diagnosed acute lymphocytic or acute myelocytic leukaemia An age and gender matched equal group of healthy children was taken as controls. Dietary-intake data was collected for six food groups, namely raw vegetables, fresh fruits, packed fruit juices, caffeinated drinks, junk foods, and processed/precooked food items. Frequency of the selected food group consumption was summarised in six categories: rarely/never, 1-3 days/week, 4-6 days/week, once daily, twice daily and thrice daily. Data was collected through interviews with the mothers using a pre-designed questionnaire, and was analysed using SPSS 21.

Results: Of the 90 subjects, 45(50%) were in each of the two groups. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups (p>0.05). Consumption of caffeinated drinks and junk food was significantly higher in cases (p=0.001) while controls showed significantly higher consumption of fresh fruits (p=0.0012). No significant difference was noted for consumption of vegetables, packed fruit juices and processed food between the groups (p> 0. 05 ).

Conclusion: Higher consumption of caffeinated drinks and junk food was observed in cases compared to controls.

Keywords: Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, Childhood leukaemia, Diet. (JPMA 70: 404; 2020).

https://doi.org/10.5455/JPMA.301301

 

Introduction

 

Leukaemia, an un-regulated clonal proliferation of haematopoietic stem cell, is the number one childhood cancer responsible for 30% of under-15-year childhood cancer burden. A 78:22 ratio between acute lymphocytic leukaemia (ALL) or acute myelocytic leukaemia (AML) varieties exists.1,2 Leukaemias are the second largest cause of childhood mortality after accidents and the incidence is increasing by 0.9% every year. The exact cause of leukaemia remains unknown.3 Recently, substantial literature considering genetic, infectious and environmental risk factors in childhood-cancer aetiology has emerged.4,5 Only a few factors like ionizing radiation and benzene exposure have definite prove nassociation.6,7,8 Leukemogenic translocations and gene fusions may explain some cases of childhood ALL originating in-utero. In addition, siblings and close relatives of a leukaemia child are more likely to develop leukaemia compared with the general population.9 Most children with leukaemia are now cured but many suffer long-term complications. The cost of leukaemia treatment, hence, extends beyond the patient, affected family, friends and the community. So developing primary prevention activities for childhood leukaemia is the need of the hour.10 Lifestyle risk factors associated with many solid tumours have received little attention in the context of leukaemia. Dietary management is a part and parcel of leukaemia treatment.11 Eating sensibly and doing exercise may have a preventive role as well. The possible relation between child's diet and risk of childhood leukaemia remains largely unexplored. Some studies have described possible association of childhood leukaemia with nutrition in early life, carcinogens in cooked meat, and increased consumption of hot dogs etc.12,13 Others have demonstrated a link between childhood leukaemia and breastfeeding practices;14,15 formula feeding alone or in combination with breastfeeding.16 Besides, data is inconsistent regarding the consumption of fruits, fruit juices and meat.17 Data on this subject is minimal in Pakistan. A recent cancer registry data from 19 centres in Pakistan demonstrated that the most common childhood cancer, both in males (3.6%) and females (2.2%), was leukaemia.18 These patients presented with higher risk features than those reported from the developed countries and almost a quarter of them failed to complete induction chemotherapy.19 The reported outcomes were inferior with high rates of infections and relapse.20 The current study was planned to explore the association of dietary factors with childhood leukaemia in Pakistani population.

 

Subjects and Methods

 

The case-control study was conducted at the Paediatric Medical Ward of the Children Hospital, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan, from January to December 2017, and comprised children of either gender aged 2-12 years with recently diagnosed ALL or AML, and an equal number of age- and gender-matched controls. After approval from the institutional ethics review board, the sample size was calculated using World Health Organisation (WHO) calculator21 by taking level of significance5%, power of test90%, exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life in cases (P1) 59.7% and exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life in controls (P2)89.6%.22 Children with other co-morbid conditions were excluded, and the sample was raised using non-probability consecutive sampling. Dietary intake data was collected using a customised food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) through face-to-face interviews with mothers of the children (Annexure).

The FFQ comprised a food list keeping in view the dietary patterns of children in our society. The data comprised demographic information along with pattern of intake of six food groups, including raw vegetables, fresh fruits, packed fruit juices, caffeinated drinks, junk foods and pre-cooked food items. Mothers were asked to recall the dietary history of their children in the preceding 2-3 years before the diagnosis of leukaemia. To summarize the frequency of the selected food group consumption, six categories were created: rarely/never, 1-3 days/week, 4-6 days/week, once daily, twice daily and thrice daily. SPSS21 was used for data analysis. Consumption of each food group was compared between the groups. Box plots were created to summarise overall consumption of each food group in the cases and the controls. Independent sample student t test was used to assess the significance of observed difference in quantitative variables between the groups. Chi-square test was used for qualitative variables. P<0.05 was considered significant.

 

Results

 

Of the 90 subjects, 45(50%) were in each of the two groups. Baseline characteristics were similar in both the groups (p>0.05) (Table 1-2).

The intake of caffeinated drinks (p=0.001) and junk food (p=0.001) was significantly higher in the cases, while the controls showed significantly higher consumption of fresh fruits(p=0.012). Consumption of processed food was higher among the cases but the difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05). No significant difference was noted for consumption of vegetables and packed fruit juices between the groups (p>0.05). Overall consumption of different food groups among cases and controls was noted (Figure),

and details of dietary consumption pattern were tabulated separately (Table3).

 

Discussion

 

The study showed excessive consumption of caffeinated drinks and junk food in the cases. Several adult and childhood cancers are linked with dietary factors.23 Micronutrients regulate cell-wall integrity, control inflammation, and improve immune responses, and, hence, interfere with cancer development.24 Various biological mechanisms such as exposure to dietary mutagens and mutagenesis due to nutrient deficiencies can explain these observations. Nutritional influence on epigenetic processes may in fact contribute to carcinogenesis.25 A recent meta-analyses by the Childhood Leukaemia International Consortium has suggested a link between childhood leukaemia and breastfeeding practices.14,15 Majority of our cases and controls were breastfed (90%) with comparable mean duration of 18.9 vs 18.1 months. (p>0.05). This is in sharp contrast to reports from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey describing 54% of infants in the United States as ever being breastfed.26 Except breastfeeding, there is lack of knowledge about the effect of early childhood-diet on the occurrence of leukaemias. Formula feeding alone or in combination with breastfeeding is associated with an increased incidence of leukaemia.16 A dose-response relationship has also been reported.27 Serum insulin-like growth factor-1(IGF-1) levels in top-fed infants are higher than in breastfed infants and foetal growth pathway is thought to play a role in leukaemia occurrence.27 In our cohort, we tried to gather data about duration and amount of formula milk consumption, but recall problems in mothers of cases and controls posed a significant challenge. Hence, these observations were not included in the final analysis. Older age at introduction to solid food in general and older age at introduction to vegetables in particular, was associated with an increased risk of childhood ALL. A reduced risk was reported for late introduction to eggs.13 However, in the present cohort, the weaning age was also similar in both groups (p>0.05). Hence, an association could not be determined. Associations between a child's consumption of various food groups and the risk for childhood leukaemia are inconsistent, especially regarding the consumption of fruits, fruit juices and meat.17 Our results showed that higher consumption of fresh fruits is associated with reduced risk of leukaemia. These findings, in association with the consumption of oranges, bananas and orangejuice, confirm the protective role of fruits and vegetables observed recently in adults with leukaemia.28 Both oranges and bananas are rich in vitamins, minerals and vitamin C. These antioxidants prevent damage to deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and hamper initial events in carcinogenesis.29 Our study results showed that consumption of caffeinated drinks and junk food was significantly higher in cases (p<0.05). In a recent meta-analysis, child's consumption of caffeinated drinks was not associated with leukaemia, in contrast to maternal consumption during pregnancy.30 This difference may be attributed to a different sample size as the other study enrolled 3649 cases and 5705 controls in contrast to our study with 45 cases and controls each, leading to higher than usual effect size. We suggest further studies with larger sample size to explain this association in greater detail. Overall, our observations suggest a consistently decreased risk of childhood leukaemia with regular consumption of fresh fruits. The association with hot dogs/lunch meats and leukaemia risk noted in earlier studies was not confirmed. Higher risk was associated with consumption of junk foods and caffeinated drinks. In summary, these findings suggest that fruits or fruit juices with a high content of vitamin C and/or potassium may reduce the risk of childhood leukaemia, when consumed regularly. If these results are extrapolated, a public health intervention of leukaemia prevention may ensue. The present study has several strengths. First, the questionnaire was designed to account for the different frequency categorisation of consumption of food groups in question. Second, the list of food items was broadspectrum to cover a typical young child's diet. Finally, selection bias among controls was probably less of a concern and paternal income and maternal education status were similar in both the groups. Overall, the role of socioeconomic status remains uncertain in the aetiology of childhood leukaemia, especially considering the difficulty in assessing socioeconomic status and disentangling the impact of bias. The current study also has its limitations. The questionnaire asked fresh fruits and fresh fruit juices as a single entity instead of two. As a result, the independent effect of juices could not be separated in the analysis, and the observed association lacks specificity. Secondly, the sample size was small for an epidemiological study. The results, hence, cannot be extended to the population in general. We suggest a future multicentre study to deal with the problem of smaller sample size. Thirdly, in the present study we only performed univariate analyses that couldn't adjust for matching factors like age and gender. Lastly, an inherent problem of allcase-control studies is the recall bias. The respondents for cases could have recalled consumption of certain foods more readily than the respondents for controls or vice versa, thus producing differential misclassification. All efforts were made to minimise the recall bias by educating the parents before the interview.

 

Conclusion

 

The consumption of caffeinated drinks and junk food was significantly higher in the cases, while the controls had significantly higher consumption of fresh fruits and fruit juices.

 

Acknowledgement: We are grateful to all the subjects for their cooperation, and to our families and friends for their continuous support and motivation.

Disclaimer: None.

Conflict Of Interest: None.

Source of Funding: None.

 

References

 

1. KliegmanRM, BehrmanRE, JensonHB, StantonBF. The Leukaemias. In: Nelson Textbook of Paediatrics, 20thed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2015, pp 2437-45.

2. GBD 2017 Childhood Cancer Collaborators. The global burden of childhood and adolescent cancer in 2017: an analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Oncol 2019;20:1211-25.

3. Amitay EL, Keinan-Boker L. Breastfeeding and Childhood Leukemia Incidence: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review. JAMA Pediatr 2015;169:e151025.

4. Belson M, Kingsley B, Holmes A. Risk factors for acute leukemia in children: a review. Environ Health Perspect 2007;115:138-45.

5. Deschler B, Lübbert M. Acute myeloid leukaemia: epidemiology and etiology. Cancer 2006;107:2099-107.

6. Shu XO, Potter JD, Linet MS, Severson RK, Han D, Kersey JH, et al. Diagnostic X-rays and ultrasound exposure and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia by immunophenotype. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002;11:177-85.

7. Almond D, Edlund L, Palme M. Chernobyl's subclinical legacy: prenatal exposure to radioactive fallout and school outcomes in Sweden. Q J Econ 2009;124:1729-72.

8. McNally RJ, Parker L. Environmental factors and childhood acute leukaemias and lymphomas. Leuk Lymphoma 2006;47:583-98.

9. Sun Y, Xiao J, Li ZH, Fan SF, Shen Y. Treatment of childhood leukemia with haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using parent as donor: a single-center study of 111 case. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2015;19:4379-84.

10. Whitehead TP, Metayer C, Wiemels JL, Singer AW, Miller MD. Childhood leukaemia and primary prevention. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 2016;46:317-52.

11. Spector LG, Ross JA, Olshan AF. Children's Oncology Group's 2013 blueprint for research: epidemiology. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2013;60:1059-62.

12. Güngör D, Nadaud P, Dreibelbis C, LaPergola CC, Wong YP, Terry N, et al. Infant milk-feeding practices and childhood leukemia: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 2019;109(Suppl 7):S757-71.

13. Kwan ML, Block G, Selvin S, Month S, Buffler PA. Food consumption by children and the risk of childhood acute leukaemia. Am J Epidemiol 2004;160:1098-107.

14. Rudant J, Amigou A, Orsi L, Althaus T, Leverger G, Baruchel A, et al. Fertility treatments, congenital malformations, fetal loss, and childhood acute leukaemia: the ESCALE study (SFCE). Pediatr Blood Cancer 2013;60:301-8.

15. Amitay EL, Keinan-Boker L. Breastfeeding and Childhood Leukaemia Incidence: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review. JAMA Pediatr 2015;169:e151025.

16. Greenop KR, Bailey HD, Miller M, Scott RJ, Attia J, Ashton LJ, et al. Breast feeding and nutrition to 2 years of age and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and brain tumors. Nutr Cancer 2015;67:431-41.

17. Diamantaras AA, Dessypris N, Sergentanis TN, Ntouvelis E, Athanasiadou-Piperopoulou F, Baka M, et al. Nutrition in early life and risk of childhood leukaemia: a case-control study in Greece. Cancer Causes Control 2013;24:117-24.

18. Badar F, Mahmood S. Epidemiology of cancers in Lahore, Pakistan, among children, adolescents and adults, 2010-2012: a crosss e c t i o n a l s t u d y p a r t 2 . BMJ Op e n 20 1 7 ; 7 : e 0 1 6 5 5 9.

19. Fadoo Z, Nisar I, Yousuf F, Lakhani LS, Ashraf S, Imam U, et al. Clinical features and induction outcome of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in a lower/middle income population: A multi-institutional report from Pakistan. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2015;62:1700-8.

20. Mushtaq N, Fadoo Z, Naqvi A. Childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: experience from a single tertiary care facility of Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc 2013;63:1399-404.

21. Lwanga SK, Lemeshow S. Sample size determination in health studies, a practical manual. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO's Press, 1991.

22. Massoud MNZ, Hassab HMA, Ali AMM, Mohamed DN. The impact of breastfeeding on the childhood acute leukaemia risk among children attending Alexandria University Children's Hospital. Blood 2015;126:3733.

23. Mosby TT, Cosgrove M, Sarkardei S, Platt KL, Kaina B. Nutrition in adult and childhood cancer: role of carcinogens and anticarcinogens. Anticancer Res 2012;32:4171-92.

24. Gibson A, Edgar JD, Neville CE, Gilchrist SE, McKinley MC, Patterson CC, et al. Effect of fruit and vegetable consumption on immune function in older people: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2012;96:1429-36.

25. Stefanska B, Karlic H, Varga F, Fabianowska-Majewska K, Haslberger A. Epigenetic mechanisms in anti-cancer actions of bioactive food components--the implications in cancer prevention. Br J Pharmacol 2012;167:279-97.

26. Li R, Ogden C, Ballew C, Gillespie C, Grummer-Strawn L. Prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding among US infants: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (phase II, 1991-1994). Am J Public Health 2002;92:1107-10.

27. SchrawJM, DongYQ, OkcuMF, ScheurerME, FormanMR. Do longer formula feeding and later introduction of solids increase risk for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia? Cancer Causes Control 2014;25:73-80.

28. Ross JA, Kasum CM, Davies SM, Jacobs DR, Folsom AR, Potter JD. Diet and risk of leukaemia in the Iowa Women's Health Study. C a n c e r E p i d emi o l B i om a r k e r s Pr e v 2 0 0 2 ; 1 1 : 7 7 7 - 8 1 .

29. Padayatty SJ, Katz A, Wang Y, Eck P, Kwon O, Lee JH, et al. Vitamin C as an antioxidant: evaluation of its role in disease prevention. J Am Coll Nutr 2003;22:18-35.

30. Thomopoulos TP, Ntouvelis E, Diamantaras AA, Tzanoudaki M, Baka M, Hatzipantelis E, et al. Maternal and childhood consumption of coffee, tea and cola beverages in association with childhood leukaemia: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol 2015;39:1047-59.

 

Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees: