Sanjay Kalra ( Department of Endocrinology, Bharti Hospital, Karnal, India. )
Bharti Kalra ( Department of Obstetrics, Bharti Hospital, Karnal, India. )
The psychosocial domain of diabetes is an important as the biomedical aspects of the syndrome. This perspective traces the evolution of diabetes care model, describes the psychological morbidity of diabetes, enumerates management strategies, and supports readers in improving their communication skills.
Concept of Diabetes Care
Once upon a time, perhaps, medical practice was physician centric and eminence based. The physician decided treatment based upon his education and experience, and could not be challenged. This unipolar construct of health care gradually gave way to a patient-centered model, in which the patient\\\'s attitudes, wishes and needs were taken as the guiding principle of management.1
This concept has been integrated into modern diabetes care, which now proposes the practice of "responsible patient centered care". This model, which enumerates ten R\\\'s (Table-1),
balances the biomedical and psychosocial needs of the patient, and the rights and responsibilities of both patient and physician. 2
The health care dyad has also undergone a transformation in diabetology-Instead of two individuals, diabetes care is considered an interaction between patient, family and community on one hand, and the health care team and health care system on the other. 3 This concept has been presented as the 3x3 P rubric (Box-1).
4 These aspects of diabetes care are important not only because they are linked with communication, but also as they all influence health-related attitudes and outcomes. 5
While this discussion may seem \\\'before its time\\\' to readers in many countries, the concepts that we describe are age old and timeless. Thousands of years ago, the Indian physician Atreya described his quadruple. Atreya\\\'s quadruple stated that four constituents needed to be empowered and strengthened, in order to ensure optimal management. These are the patient, physician, drug and attendant. Each of these is further described as having four ideal characteristics. These form the four quadruplets of Atreya.6Thus, patient-centered care, team work and community/family involvement in medicine is ancient wisdom and practice.
Diabetes is marked by various psychological and psychiatric responses, some of which may be dysfunctional. Such morbidity is acknowledged by the bio psychosocial model of health, 7 and covered in modern management guidelines. 8,9
The most common emotional response to diabetes, perhaps, is diabetes distress. Diabetes distress is defined as "an emotional response characterized by extreme apprehension, discomfort, or dejection, due to perceived inability in coping with the challenges and demands of living with diabetes".10 Diabetes distress symptomatology is similar to that of depression but lacks the severity to be classified as major depressive disorder (MDD) according to DSM-5 criteria. The treatment of diabetes distress is based upon communication, and is purely non-pharmacological in nature. As it does not meet the criteria for depression, anti-depressants or anxiolytics should not be prescribed. The diabetes distress management strategy is highly individualized, and varies according to patient needs, health care provider ability, and health care system policy. If not addressed in a timely manner, diabetes distress may impact overall health, and prevent attainment of therapeutic goals.
We suggest a few treatment strategies which are helpful in managing diabetes distress. The cornerstone of managing diabetes distress is \\\'Diabetes therapy by the ear\\\'. 11 This construct includes the triptych of active listening (diagnosis), empathic expression (treatment), and filtering of irrational or inaccurate facts and misinformation. A mnemonic which paraphrases this is the 5 I strategy, which enjoins us to discuss potential sources of diabetes distress and explain management skills to patients (Table-2). 10
Coping skills training is an important part of preventing and managing diabetes distress. This intervention is important for both patient and physician. The AEIOU framework provides a construct which facilitates coping skills training in the diabetes clinic (Table-3). 12
This can be used in conjunction with the Gluco Coper tool, which assesses coping skills, to help the patient live a confident life with diabetes. 10
Polishing Physician Skills
The astute diabetes care provider needs to achieve, and maintain, proficiency in both biomedical and psychosocial spheres of medicine. It is relatively more challenging to learn "psychosocial" or communication and motivation skills. This section presents a few pedagogic tools that we have found helpful in explaining this concept.
The basic foundations of a physician patient relationship is communication. This can be strengthened by careful and diligent practice.
Tables-4, 5 and 6 highlight three mnemonics which list the attributes as to how a good diabetologist should manage a conversation, and how he/she should proceed whenever he/ she wishes to facilitate a major behavioural change. 13-15 Behavioural change is best achieved if it is broken into smaller steps. This helps reduce the discomfort of change as well (Table-7). 16
This perspective does not seek to provide an overview of nonpharmacological management of diabetes and its psychological morbidity. Rather, it offers a framework which helps the diabetes care professional to link all possible interventions under a single umbrella. This single, and seemingly simple, concept that we suggest, is Communication.
1. Picker Principles of Patient Centered Care; Principles of patient-centered care. (Cited 2017 Apr 22). Available form URL: http://cgp.pickerinstitute.org/?page_id=1319.
2. Kalra S, Baruah MP, Unnikrishnan A G. Responsible patient-centered care. Indian J Endocr Metab 2017; 21: 365-6.
3. Baptista DR, Wiens A, Pontarolo R, Regis L, Reis WC, Correr CJ. The chronic care model for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2016; 8: 7.
4. Kalra S. Evolution of diabetes care. 3x3 P rubric.
5. Kalra S, Unnikrishnan AG, Baruah MP. Interaction, information, involvement (the 3I strategy): Rebuilding trust in the medical profession. Indian J Endocr Metab 2017; 21: 268.
6. Kalra S, Kalra B, Agrawal N. Therapeutic patient education: Lessons from Ayurveda: The quadruple of Atreya. Internet J Geriatr Gerontol 2010; 5: 10.
7. Engel GL. The clinical application of the bio psychosocial model. Am J Psychiatry. 1980; 137: 535-44.
8. Kalra S, Sridhar GR, Balhara YP, Sahay RK, Bantwal G, Baruah MP, et al. National recommendations: Psychosocial management of diabetes in India. Indian J Endocr Metab. 2013; 17: 376.
9. Young-Hyman D, de Groot M, Hill-Briggs F, Gonzalez JS, Hood K, Peyrot M. Psychosocial care for people with diabetes: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2016; 39: 2126-40.
10. Kalra S, Verma K, Balhara YPS. Diabetes Distress. J Pak Med Assoc. 2017; 67: 1625-7.
11. Kalra S, Baruah MP, Das AK. Diabetes therapy by the ear: A bi-directional process. Indian J Endocr Metab. 2015; 19 (Suppl 1): S4.
12. Kalra S, Kalra B, Sharma A, Sirka M. Coping skills training: The AEIOU approach. Endocrine Journal 2010; 57: S391-S391.
13. Kalra S, Kalra B. A good diabetes counselor \\\'Cares\\\': Soft skills in diabetes counseling. Internet J Health. 2010; 11: 1-3.
14. Kalra S, Kalra B, Sharma A, Sirka M. Motivational interviewing: The WATER approach. Endocrine Journal 2010; 57: S391
15. Kalra S, Gupta Y. Social pharmacology and diabetes. Indian J Pharmacol. 2014; 46: 564.
16. Kalra S, Kumar S, Kalra B, Unnikrishnan A, Agrawal N, Sahay R. Patient-provider interaction in diabetes: Minimizing the discomfort of change. Internet J Fam Pract. 2010; 8: 1.