Objective: To investigate the efficacy and impact of Protection Against Harassment of Women at Workplace Act 2010 in the public health sector in its socio-legal perspective.
Method: This cross-sectional study was conducted from July to December 2014 in Abbottabad, Pakistan, and comprised subjects selected from 53 basic health units managed by the government. SPSS 20 was used for statistical analysis.
Results: Of the 450 questionnaires, 430(96.6%) were returned duly filled. Overall, 40% male (120 respondents) and 26% female (34 respondents) knew about the Act. Besides, 39% males (117 respondents) and 63% females (82 respondents) appeared unsatisfied with the complaint mechanism prescribed in the Act; all the respondents established that no case had been registered after the introduction of the Act. Overall, 31% males (93 respondents) and 57% females (74 respondents) thought that without the health governance commitment and social support structure the Act could not work.
Conclusion: The Protection Against Harassment of Women at Workplace Act 2010 was considered ineffective by the respondents who were concerned about the lack of social support system for the Act.
Keywords: Harassment, Efficacy, Impact, Health sector, Abbottabad. (JPMA 67: 37; 2017)
Workplace harassment is any unwanted and annoying act of a party or a group including threats or demands by a supervisor or employee towards any other employee. The purpose of such act may vary from personal malice to an attempt to force someone to quit a job or grant sexual favours or merely gain sadistic pleasure for making someone fearful.1 As the participation of women in workforce has increased, the social and economic development of women is halted by a few stakeholders who harass them at work.2 The United Nations (UN) defines harassment as any kind of behaviour that hinders work and creates offensive/hostile work environment for women.3
The International Labour Organisation (ILO) emphasises the need to empower women and to help them continue their jobs by eliminating discrimination and harassment from workplaces to increase women\\\'s participation in the workforce. The Convention on Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) articulates actions to avoid discrimination on the basis of gender and conditions, which lead to sexual harassment.4
Many of the Asian countries have formulated anti-sexual harassment acts. The Philippines passed an anti-sexual harassment act in 1995 but the number of sexual harassment cases has increased since the promulgation of the law. Thailand included penalties for sexual harassment at workplace in its labour code in 1998, but sexual harassment has continued as before.5 Malaysia passed many bills to prevent sexual harassment at workplace and the number of cases of sexual harassment has come down. The Indian government passed the sexual harassment of women at workplace bill on February 26, 20136 but it has been unhelpful in eliminating harassment.
In Pakistan, Alliance Against Sexual Harassment (AASHA) drafted a code of conduct to curb harassment at workplace,7 which turned into Protection against Harassment of Women at the Workplace (PAHWAW) Act 2010. A survey in 2007 depicted that 78% of working women face harassment, and that to build a positive image of workplace for women in Pakistani society had triggered the process of developing such laws.8 Sexual harassment is more common in situations where there are unequal gender ratio and large power differentials,9 and it is observed that there is highly unequal gender ratio and large power differentials in the health sector of Pakistan. According to a report by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Pakistan/ Abbottabad, women are at a large disadvantage in terms of employment in this district as they are at lower ranks in jobs.10 The current study was therefore planned to assess the extent of awareness of male and female employees regarding PAHWAW Act as well as to analyse the efficacy and impact of PAHWAWA in the health sector of Abbottabad.
Subjects and Methods
This cross-sectional study was conducted from July to December 2014 in Abbottabad, Pakistan, and comprised subjects selected from basic health units managed by the government. The questionnaire used to collect data was based on Contemporary Feminist Theory11 (Table-1)
The questionnaire had three sections: extent of awareness; efficacy and impact of the Act; and extensive reasons for ineffectiveness of the Act. Each section of the questionnaire included a set of statements to which the respondents were asked to reflect. Section 1 of the questionnaire measured the extent of awareness regarding PAHWAWA availability, literacy and display; section 2 measured its efficacy and impact regarding the complaint mechanism and penalties; and section 3 measured extensive reasons for ineffectiveness of the Act regarding framework for implementation of the act and socio-cultural dynamics. The questionnaire was validated by seven health district officers.
Using purposive sampling, the study sample was raised from 53 basic health units (BHUs) of Abbottabad, each having 9 members: medical officer, male technician, female technician, lady health visitor, male/female expanded programme on immunisation (EPI) staff, male/female supervisor on malaria, midwife, watchman and peon. The respondents were contacted and given an explanation of the purpose of the study, and their verbal consent was obtained. The questionnaires were hand-delivered by the data collection team.
Data were computed and analysed using SPSS 20 and descriptive analysis was conducted. The results of each item in the questionnaire were reported as frequencies and percentages.
In 53 basic health units, 7(13%) medical officers were female and 46(87%) were males. Overall, 33% staff was female. The questionnaire was distributed among 450 subjects; 300(66.6%) male and 150(33.3%) female. Out of the distributed questionnaires, 430(96.6%) were returned duly filled (all the 300 males responded while 130 females responded out of 150 sample population), and suggested that the males had more knowledge about the Act (Table-2)
The employees knew that the Act existed but most of them had not read the content of the Act and they did not know how to use the Act. The mean extent of awareness regarding the Act was 40% males (120 respondents) and 26% females (34 respondents).
Data reflecting the complaint mechanism showed that 39% males (117 respondents) and 63% females (82 respondents) were unsatisfied with the mechanism (Table-3)
All of the respondents expressed that none of the case has been registered after the PAHWAWA.
When the respondents were asked to contextualise the Act in the prevailing mindset (men take women as objects of pleasure only, men consider themselves as dominant in workplaces) problems in framework for implantation (lack of commitment and capacity of employers, absence of security by the government) and socio-cultural dynamics (men have learnt from their family systems that they are dominant and they will not accept any pro-women law/act, women learnt to be inferior and to keep their prestige while not reporting any such kind of case/mishap, the society accepts such laws as useless, 31% males (93 respondents) opined that the law had proved ineffective because of extensive reasons, while 57% females (74 respondents) formulated the extensive reasons responsible for the ineffectiveness of the Act (Table-4)
Women protection law mechanisms in developing countries vary significantly from one country to another. In Pakistan it was a milestone to transform a bill into a law but unfortunately, the law has served as a piece of paper only. The ministries all over Pakistan have adopted code of conduct but awareness-raising seminars are only held in 7 ministries out of 17.12 Sexual harassment watch organisation reports that in Pakistan out of 1074 organisation in the database, only 362 have adopted the code of conduct.13 The research in Karachi and Lahore regarding the efficacy and impact shows that most of the females are not aware of the Act; and those who are aware of the Act are afraid of registering a case against the harassers as they think it is like losing the job. The impeding factor is a lack of political will and the prevalence of patriarchal mindset. Deep-rooted attitudes and cultural practices cannot be changed through enactment of laws. More efforts are required to bring mind-gender sensitivity and consciousness in society.14
The analysis suggests that the term \\\'sexual\\\' is not clearly defined in PAHWAWA. The sense of harassment is also not restricted; that to where a complainant has felt offended, threatened, demeaned, or intimidated, these three manifestations cannot be anticipated in the workplaces.15
It is imprecise about which acts of harassment merit major versus minor penalties. These penalties are mentioned in the Act without direction as to what penalty should be imposed to what type of offences which will result in dissimilar decisions and penalties being imposed in different organisations which will cause lack of credibility and standards.16 Setting up an inquiry committee may not be helpful in every organisation. If the complainant and the accused file against the ombudsperson he/she will go to the governor of the province or the president of the country; and that does not seem practical. The situation may lead to abuse of authority by the employer to pressurise the complainant not to launch the complaint formally.17
During the survey, awareness about the Act surprisingly was found more in male respondents than the females; it was 40% in males (120 respondents) and 26% in females (34 respondents). This finding is consistent with a qualitative study18 which showed that females do not try to gather the information which may imply indignity to their being. It indicates that the females view the law as mere symbolic initiative.
When asked how many cases have been registered after the PAHWAWA; none of the respondents had registered a case before or after the Act. This agrees with an earlier finding which reported that women do not opt for legal mechanisms because of its tedious nature.19 A vast majority of the respondents appeared uncomfortable when asked about the minor and major penalties as the implementation seems very much questionable, a finding which supports a previous study that showed that females are reluctant to opt for the new role for change. 20
The responses were largely the same about the prevailing mindset, framework for the implementation of the Act, socio-cultural dynamics as disablers for the effectiveness of PAHWAWA. Again, this is in line with an observation discussed at large in Working with Sharks.21 Respondents agreed that the Act can be a source of change if it is supported by society. Our study showed that females have genuine expectations of the employers as knowledgeable implementers, but at the moment, the Act seems ineffective in Pakistan. Factors that contribute to this lack of confidence may include deficiency in the commitment of the employer and inadequate support system. These have been identified in countries where legal practice for women protection is in the early stage of gender care development.22
Our study has some limitations. The study was conducted only in the health sector of district Abbottabad, so the data cannot be applied to the whole of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province. Besides, the study only involved health workforce in public BHUs so the findings are not applicable to the private health sector.
PAHWAWA 2010 was seen as having technical flaws in its content. The males were found more aware about the act, males were found more satisfied with the complaint mechanism, and males were less inclined to link the ineffectiveness of the act to extensive reasons. We recommend the elimination of all technical flaws. Awareness should be raised through specific training programmes which can prepare workers to recognise workplace harassment. Proper feedback and scrutiny by the government is also required to monitor proper implementation of the Act.
Conflict of Interest: None.
Funding Disclosure: None.
1.Delphi survey conducted by the study; opinion of the 16 experts from academia, civil society and law validated to define workplace harassment, 2013.
2.Moosa M.). Sexual Harassment at Workplace in Pakistan: Issues and Remedies about the Global Issue at Managerial Sector. J Managerial Sci. 2013;VII:113-25.
3.UN-IANWGE. United nations, Inter-Agency Network on Women and Gender Equality.[Online] 2013 [cited 2013 May 14]. Available from: URL: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/osagi/pdf/IMFpolicysh3.pdf
4.Adrienne Cruz, Sabine Klinger. "Gender-based violence in the world of work: Overview and selected annotated bibliography". [Online] [cited 2014 June 11]. Available from: URL:www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public
5.Thanenthiran. S. Reclaiming and redefining rights, thematic studies series 1: sexuality and rights in Asia. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Asian-Pacific Resource & Research Centre for Women (ARROW), 2009.
6.Gosh R. Sexual harassment of women not down despite laws to protect them. Zee research group. [Online] 2013 [cited 2013 May 13]http://zeenews.india.com/tags/Zee_Research_Group.html
7.Mahmood Q, Ahmad I. Perception of Sexual Harassment at Workplace, Knowledge and Attitude of Working Women towards Workplace Harassment Act 2010. Social Sci Rev Pakistan. 2010;Volume 1-Issue 1.
8.Weiss, A. Moving forward with the legal empowerment of women in Pakistan. Special report, United States Institute of Peace,2012.
9.Gruber J. The Impact of Male Work Environments and Organizational Policies on Women\\\'s Experiences of Sexual Harassment. Gender and Society. 1998;12-No. 3.
10.IUCN Report: Abbottabad state of environment and development. Government of the North-West Frontier Province (NWFP), 2004.
11.Sociological Theory. In: Contemporary Feminist Theory. 6th edition. McGraw-Hill, 2004.
12.Kazi G.Report: A study conducted on gender discrimination in job opportunities, and impact on gender awareness in a public sector organization. Planning and development division/ commission, Govt. Of Pakistan, 2011.
13.Sexual Harassment [Online] [cited 2014 May 2].Available from: URL:www.sexualharassmentwatch.org
14.A long drawn struggle, excerpts from the interview of Mahnaz Rahman (resident director of Aurat foundation). DAWN magazine. 2012 February 12.
15.Farkhanda A. Consultant Women Legislation in Pakistan: Aurat Foundation Islamabad (Personal Interview), 2013.
16.Kapoor A ed. 1999. Women Workers\\\' Rights: A Reference Guide. New Delhi: International Labour Organization.
17.Fauzia S. Working with Sharks. 2nd Edition. Oxford,2011.
18.Derogatis LR. SCL-90-R: Administration, scoring & procedures manual MD: Clinical Psychometric Research, 1983.
19.Kumar MP. No End to Harrassment, May 18, by arrangement with Women Feature Service.[Online] 2014 [cited 2014 February 13]. Available from: URL: www.boloji.com.
20.Culbertson AL, Roseenfeld P, Booth-Kewley S, & Magnusson P. Assessment of sexual harassment in the Navy: Results of the 1989 Navy-wide survey: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center,1992.
21.Saeed F. Working with sharks: countering sexual harrasment in our lives. Sanj Publishers, Pakistan, 2011.
22.National Commission for Women . Study to Access the Harrassment of Women at Work in Organized and Unorganized Sectors. New Delhi, 2003.