April 1982, Volume 32, Issue 4


Barium Examination of Small Intestine

Islam Junaid  ( Surgical Unit I, Civil Hospital, Karachi. )

Radiological investigations of small intestine with contrast medium were started in early part of this century. Since then barium studies have become well established in the diagnosis of diseases of small intestine and various techniques have evolved.
Earlier “Follow Through” examination was described by Cole and colleagues (1934) using thick barium paste (227 ml. of barium and 142 ml. of water) and large films were taken one half hour after the upper G.I.T. exaniination and then at 2, 4 and 6 hours. In 1959 Golden perfected the technique and 113 Gm. of nonfloculating barium suspended in water was used and found better for the demonstration of mucosal detail.
To increase the speed anti reduce the time of examination various suggestions were made. Barium-saline mixture followed by ice cold saline was used by Weintraub and Williams in 1949 and 90% of the examination was cornpleted in one hour. Metocloprarnide 20 mg. I/V given after the examination of oesophagus and stomach (James and Flume, 1968; iJowarth etal., 1969) and Gastrograffin added to barium (Rosenquist, 1975) also reduced the transit time. However the advantage of decreasing the transit time is offset by diminished anatomical detail, particularly in the terminal ileum.
Preliminary cleansing of colon combined with use of 284 ml. of barium suspension and placing the patient in lateral recumbent position also produced rapid uniform filling of small intestine (Nice, 1963, 1974). The only merits of barium follow through are that it is simple to perform and causes no discomfort to the patients.
For “Oral Double Contrast” technique, 60 mg. of Propentheline is given l,M and 40 minutes after a barium meal air is pumped via a flexible tube into the stomach which passes through the duodenum and distends the loops small intestine and gives better mucosal detail (Pajeskwi et al, 1970).
A good technique for demonstration of small intestine is refluxing of barium from the colon into the ileum (Miller, 1965). It is very useful in small intestine obstruction and technique of choice for demonstrating terminal ileurn.
Another good technique for visualisation of ileocaecal region is administering barium orally and introducing air rectally when barium is in the terminal ileum (Kellet et al., 1977) and especially recommended for Crohn’s disease of terminal ileum and carcmoma of caccurn (Kellet et al., 1977).
In indirect technique barium is introduced into the small intestine by doudenal intubation. Gershon-Cohen and Shay in 1939 used a simple barium suspension in water and introduced air to obtain double contrast. The technique was called Bariumenteroclysis. Complete filling of the small intestine is accomplished in 15 minutes. Schatzki in 1943 stated that this method was better than any other available method for the study of morphological changes in the sfnall intestine.
In one of the modifications a tube with a stiff outer sheath for stomach and a flexible inner tube for manipulation at pylorus is used. Barium is followed by water to give double contrast (Scott-Harden, 1969). The outline of the whole of small intestine is usually complete within 10 minutes of injection of water. This technique was further improved by using barium suspension of fixed specific gravity (125-1 .32) antI a low residue diet and aperient are used a day hefi)re (Sellink, 1976). This tcchniquc has proved useful for Crohn’s disease and discreate and fissure ulcers, longitudinal ulceration, sinuses and fi stulae thickening and cobbleston ing, strictures with proximal dilatation asymetrical involvement, skip lesions and pseudopolysis have been clearly demonstrated (Nolan, 1980; Valleuce, 1980; Flippeli and Grehn, 1978; Skjennald and Samset, 1980; Herlinger, 1978). Other small intestinal lesions in which this infusion technique has proved useful are Carcinoid tumours(Sellink, 1976; Schalanger, 1976), Lymphomas (Sellink, 1976), Yerscinia enterocolitis (Wiechen, 1974), Meckle’s diverticulum (Bartram and Amess, 1980; Maglinte et al., 1980), Adhesions after surgery (Bartram, 1980), Jschaemic strictures (Marks et al., 1979) and Coeliac disease (Sellink, 1976; Muller, 1976). The site of small bowel obstruction can be shown and in many cases causes can be identified (Marks and Nolan, 1978).
Various types of intestinal tubes are being used to decompress the intestinal loops in intestinal obstructions. Very useful diagnostic information can be obtained by injecting barium through these tubes when these are not advancing, at the site of obstruction (Herlinger, 1978; Abbot and johnston, 1938; Boon, 1940; Osgood, 1947; Golden et al., 1940).
Now it is known that the conventional Follow-through is not very accurate, it should be replaced by Single contrast dilute barium technique which is very satisfactory in detecting diseases of the small intestine (Sellink, 1976), Per-oral pneumocolon examination should be used for suspected ileocaecal and terminal ileum pathologies.


1. Abbot, W.O. and Johnston, C.G. (1938) Intubation studies of the human small intestine. A non-surgical method of treating, localizing and diagnosing the nature of obstructive lesion. Surg. Gynaecol. Obstet., 66:691.
2. Bartram, C.I. and Amess, J.A. (1980) The diagnosis of Meckel’s diverticulum by small bowel enema in the investigation of obscure intestinal bleeding. Br. j. Surg., 67 :417.
3. Bartram, C.I. (1980) The radiological demonstration of adhesions following surgery for inflamatory bowel disease. Br. J. Radiol., 53:650.
4. Boon, T.FJ. (1940) Intubation of small intestine; demonstration and localization of partially obstructive lesions. Lancet, 1:7.
5. Cole, I.G., Pound, R.E., Cole, W.G., Morse, R.R., Headland, C.I. and Naslund. Radiologic exploration of the mucosa of the gastrointestinal tract. Saint Paul, Bruce, 1934.
6. Gershon-Cohen, J. and Shay, H. (1939) Barium enterolysis; method for direct immediate examination of the small intestine by single and double contrast techniques. AJR., 42:456.
7. Golden, R. (1936) The small intestine and diarrhoea. AJR., 36:892.
8. Golden, R., Leigh, O.C. and Swenson, P.C. (1940) Roentgen-ray examination with the Miller-Abbot tube, Radiology, 35:521.
9. Flippeli, R. and Grehn, S. (1978) Untersuchungen zur intesivdiagnostik dunndernes mit der sondenmethode. Roefo, 129:713-23.
10. Herlinger, H. (1978) A modified technique for the double contrast small bowel enema. Gastrointest. Radiol., 3:201.
11. Howarth, F.1-I., Cockel, R., Roper, B.W. and Hawkins, C.I. (1969) The effect of metoclopramide upon gastric motility and its value in barium progress meal. Clin. Radiol., 20 :294,
12. James, W.B. and Hume, R. (1968) Action of metoclopramide on gastric emptying and small bowel transit time. Gut., 9:203.
13. Kellet, M.J., Zborlsk, F.F. and Marguilis, A.R. (1977) Per oral pneumocolon examination of the ileocaecal region. Gastrointest. Radiol., 1:361.
14. Maglinte, D.D.T., Elmore, M.F., Isenberg, M. and Dolan, P,A. (1980) Meckel diverticulum; radiological demonstration by enteroclysis. AJR., 134:925.
15. Marks, C.G. and Nolan, D.J. (1978) Barium infusion exam­ination in acute small bowel obstruction. Gut., 19 :A987.
16. Marks, C.G., Nolan, flJ., Pins, J. and Webster, C.U. (1979) Small bowel stricture after blunt abdominal trauma. Br. J. Surg., 66 :663.
17. Miller, K.E. (1965) Complete refluxe small bowel examination, Radiology, 84 :457.
18. Muller, W.F.H. (1976) Enteroclysis in Coeliac disease. Radiol. Clin. (Basel), 45:140-54.
19. Nice, C.M. Jr. (1963) Roentgenographic pattern and motility in small bowel studies. RadiOlogy, 80:39,
20. Nice, C.M. (1974) Controlled roentgen examination of the small bowel. Minn. Med., 57:281.
21. Nolan, D.J. Radiology of the Crohn’s disease of the small intestine. National University of Ireland, 1980,
22. Noland, D.J. and Gourtsoyiannis, N.C. (1980) Crohn’s disease of the small intestine; a review of the radiological appearance in 100 consecutive patients examined by a barium infusion technique. Gin. Radiol., 31:597.
23. Osgood, E.C. (1947) The role of radiologist in the management of patients with intestinal obstruction, with special reference to the use of Miller-Abbott tube. Radiology, 49:529.
24. Pajewski, M., Itzchak, Y. and Profis, A. (1970) The double contrast examination of the small intestine. Preliminary communication of a new technique. Clin. Radiol,, 21:83.
25. Rosenquist, C.J. (1975) Methods of acceleration of small intestinal radiographic examination. West J. Med., 122:320.
26. Schatzki, R. (1943) Small intestine enema. AJR., 50:743.
27. Schlanger, J.T. (1976) Radiology of carcinoid tumours of small intestine. Radiol. Clin., 45:105.
28. Scott-Harden, W.G. Examination of the small bowel, in modern trends in diagnostic radiology. Edited by J.W. McLaren London Butterworth, 1960.
29. Sellink, J.L. Radiological atlas of common diseases of the small bowel. Leiden, Stenfert Kroese, 1976.
30. Skjennald, A. and Samset, J.H. (1980) Duodeno-jejunal intubation in examination of small intestine. Clin. Radiol., 31 :221.
31. Vallence, R. (1980) An evaluation of small bowel enema based on an analysis of 350 consecutive examinations. Clin. Radiol., 31:227.
32. Weintraub, S. and Williams, R.G. (1949) Rapid method of roentgenologic examination of small intestine. A preliminary report. AJR., 61:45.
33. Wiechen, P.J. Van. (1974) Radiological changes in the distal part of the ileum in association with Yerscinia enterocolitis infection. Radiol. Clin. (Basel), 43:242.

Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees: