A.Samad Khan ( Department of Surgery, Khyber Medical College, Peshawar. )
Rukhsana ( Department of Surgery, Khyber Medical College, Peshawar. )
Shehzad Anjum Rana ( Department of Surgery, Khyber Medical College, Peshawar. )
Typhoid perforation is a common cause of Peritonitis and requires an early diagnosis, correction of electrolyte imbalance and prompt surgical treatment. The overall mortality rate has shown some improvement (i.e. 18. 1%) by local excision of the ulcer site and anastomosis in two layers. The figure though better is still higher than 9.9% reported by Klim (1975) (JPMA 32:46, 1982).
Peritonitis due to typhoid perforation is associated with marked toxicity, dehydration and electrolyte imbalance. This type of perforation forms 50% of total cases of intestinal perforations (Aziz 1978). A conservative approach in these cases has no place and the mortality is as high as 82.8% (Kurnvilla 1978).
The study of 22 cases of typhoid perforations is presented as a part of the trial to find out ways to reduce the mortality rate.
Material and Methods
Twenty patients were admitted with the diagnosis of acute abdomen, during the period from January, 1978 to January, 1980, in the Surgical ‘B’ Unit of Khybcr Hospital, Peshawar. Eighteen were admitted as emergencies through the casualty out-door and 4 were referred from various medical units and were admitted through the regular out-patients departments.
Most of the cases were males, and male to female ratio was 19:3. The common age group involved was between 19-32 yeas followed by the next lower age group of 10-18 years (Table-I).
In all these patients, except three, a preoperative diagnosis of typhoid perforation was made on the history and clinical examination and was confirmed at laparotomy. In 3 cases the preoperative diagnosis was of a perforated appendix because the history was very short and pain was localised. Temperature of over 100.F of more than two weeks duration was recorded in all the patients. Abdominal pain was present in 81%, vomiting in 90%, abdominal distension in 81 and 18.9% patients were in shock.
In six out of 22 cases Salmonella Typhi was grown in cultures and others showed a predominence of E.coli. Widals test was positive in all the cases.
All these cases were trated in our unit and necessary investigations were done before emergency operations. Electrolyte imbalance and dehydration was corrected promptly and blood transfusion was given when considered necessary.
Anaesthesia: General anaesthesia was used in all except in 2 cases where only drainage of the peritoneal cavity was carried out under local anaesthesia. These two patients were 1 male and 1 female. The female patient improved after simple drainage and parentral drug therapy with chloromycetine. The male patient went into septicemic shock and died.
Operation: In all the cases we found more than one perforation, in the terminal 30 cm of ileum. We resected one cm area around the perforation and healthy bleeding edges of the gut were anastomosed together with 2/0 chromic catgut sutures in 2 layers. A thorough lavage of the peritoneal cavity was done to minimise collections at perferation sites. In two cases right hamicolectomy was performed because of multiple perforations and fibrous adhesions with caecum and ascending colon. In 4 cases only a histopathologica 1 report was available showing inflammatory charges consistent with salmonella infection.
Prolonged paralytic ileus was recorded in 4 patients, wound dehiscence in 3, incisional hernia developed in one patient whereas 2 cases had chest infection and 2 cases from the series formed a faecal fistula.
The outcome of treatment is shown in Table II. One female patient who underwent right hemicolectomy did not recover from shock. One male patient who also underwent right Hemicolectomy developed jaundice and went into Hepatorenal shut down and died. One patient operated under local anaesthesia for simple drainage also died. One patient developed faescal fistula and left the hospital against medical advice.
It has been taught and practiced that typhoid perforation may be treated conservatively (Rains and Ritche 1975) which, in our experience is not true. The typhoid perforation gives rise to a generalised peritonitis (Mulligan 1972 and Olurian 1972) therefore surgical intervention should be prompt. Correction of fluid and electrolyte balance and anaemia wili enable an already toxic patient with peritcnitis to with stand surgery better. Limited resection of the diseased gut or excision of the ulcer site is recommended and has been effective in our series. Olurin and Ajayi (1972), recommand that a lccal excision or “wedge resection” should be done in limited number of perforations and not simple closure. Simple closure of the perforation carries a high mortality, and in patients with multiple perfbrations it is 100% while wedge resection has a mortality rate of 20%, (Olurin and Ajayi 1972). More than 100 cases are admitted every year in the surgical units of Lady Reading and Khyber Hospital with symptoms of peritonitis due to typhoid fever and they have an over all mortality of more than 62% with all types of treatment regimen which mostly includes the laparotomy, closure of perforations and peritoneal lavage. These two hospitals are the teaching hospitals of NWFP and have a tremendous turn over. Post operative morbidity though common has not been very disturbing in this series. No other intra-abdominal lesion apart from the intestinal perforation and peritonitis was observed. Whereas some authors have described perforation of the Gall Bladder (Vargas and Pena 1975) and the Vermiform appendix (Stuart 1946) in Typhoid Fever.
I am highly indebted to Prof Qazi Khadim Muhy Uddin for his kind help and guidance. I am also grateful to Mr. Azizur Rehman Awan for typing the manuscript.
1. Aziz A. Preliminary report on intest, perforations. 4th All Pakistan Paediatrics Conference Peshawar March, 1978. Archampong, E.Q.(1976) Typhoid ileal perforations; why such mortalities? Br. J. Surg., 63:317.
2. Bailey H. Short pradice of rurgery. 16th ed., editol by A.J. Harding Rains and David Ritchie. London, Leuois, 1975. Klim, J.P. or S.K. and Jareett, F. (1975) Management of Heal Perforation due to typhoid F. Jounal, Vol. page.Kurnvilla, M.J. (1978) Role of resection in typhoid perforation. Ann. Roy. Coil. Surg., Eng., 60:408. Mulligan, T.0. (1972) The treatment of typhoid perforation of the ileum. J.R. Coil. Surg. (Edin.), 17:364.
3. Olurin, E.O., Ajayi, 0.0. and Bohrer, S.P. (1972) Typhoid perforation. J.R. Coil. Sang. (Edin.), 17:353.
4. Stuart, B.M. and Dullen, R.L. (1946) Typhiod; clinical analysis of three hundred and sixty cases. Arch. intern. Med., 78 :629.
5. Vargas M. and Pena, A. (1975) Perforated viscera in typhoid fever; a better prognosis for children. P. Ped. Surg., 10:531.