May 1986, Volume 36, Issue 5

Case Reports

DEMONSTRATION OF A RENOPERITONEAL FISTULA BY RADIONUCLIDE RENAL SCANNING: A CASE REPORT

Durr-e-Sabih  ( Pakistan Atomic Energy Medical Centre, Nishtar Medical College and Hospital, Multan. )
Sher Mohammad Khan  ( Pakistan Atomic Energy Medical Centre, Nishtar Medical College and Hospital, Multan. )
Zahida Sabth  ( Pakistan Atomic Energy Medical Centre, Nishtar Medical College and Hospital, Multan. )

Abstract

Radionuclide renal studies are minimally invasive, easy to perform and give information about both renal structure and function. These studies may be safely used to detect urinary ex­ travasations from the upper urinary tract.
A case of renoperitoneal fistula imaged by nuclear medicine technique is described. (JPMA36: 118, 1986).

The diagnosis of urinary extravasation using nuclear medicine procedures after trauma and renal transplants is well documented1-4 but radionuclide scanning for urinary extravasa­tion in conditions other than these has rarely been reported5,6 Surgically related extravasations are common but they are usually small and retroperi. toneal. We describe here an iatrogenic renoperi­toneal fistula which presented with tense ascites.

Case Report

A 30 years old female was admitted to a surgical unit of Nishtar Hospital with rapidly accumulating ascites. She gave history of renal pain. She had undergone pyelolithotomy for this at a district headquarter hospital about two weeks prior to her admission in Nishtar Hospital. Abdominal distension was noted on the third post. operative day which had rapidly progressed.
On examination, she was weak, emaciated, had a rapid low volume pulse and slow laboured respiration. There was no jaundice. She had tense ascites and a recently healed Morrison’s incision on the left side. The liver and spleen were palpable.
On investigations, the blood picture was normal. Liver scan was done which showed a medially and caudally displaced liver and spleen with a normal radiocolloid distribution in the liver (Figure I).

The scan findings were not typical of cirrhosis. A diagnostic ascitic fluid tap was done and the results were: pH 9, Sugar---, Occult blood---, Protein---. Urea was 22mg/di, Creatinine 1 .Omg/di and Proteins 820mg/ dl. Microscopy showed 15-20 pus cells/HPF, TLC
100/mm3, Polymorphs 90%, Lymphocytes 10%, Total cells including RBCs were 1400/mm3.
The pathologists impression was that of urine in the peritoneal cavity with peritoneal reaction. A radionuclide renal scan was done using 10 mCi of technetium labelled glucoheptonate (Figure 2).

The scan showed good renal function on both sides, there was activity retention in the left upper pole indicating intrarenal obstruction. An abnormal drainage channel was seen arising from the lateral part of the left kidney. A lateral view showed the channel to course posteriorly and upwards and then curve slightly anteriorly.
The patient was advised surgery but she refused and left the hospital on the next day against medical advice.

DISCUSSION

The use of radionuclides in the investigation of the kidneys has the advantages of minimal invasiveness, no patient discomfort and the fact that a single injection gives information about renal perfusion, functional integrity of the renal cortices and the state of the urinary drainage system. There is almost no chance of allergic reaction to the injected radiopharmaceutical. The use of radionuclides in the detection of upper urinary tract abnormalities associated with trauma are reported to have a better sensitivity than IVP2,5 and in atleast one major centre radio­nuclide renal studies were done as the primary screening procedure in cases of renal trauma1.
In this patient there was difference of opinion initially about the origin of the ascitic fluid; as the liver and spleen were palpable a hepatic pathology was first suspected, however, liver scanning and the ascitic fluid report excluded this possibility. A second diagnosis of renoperitoneal fistula was made and a radio­nuclide study done. An abnormal urinary drainage tract was seen which confirmed the diagnosis.
The ease with which this investigation was performed in this patient reiterates the advantages of nuclear medicine investigations in critical patients, especially as a part of the workup of those who have sustained trauma, iatrogenic or otherwise.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors acknowledge the help of Dr. Abdur Rauf Khan, MD, FCAP., of the Department of Nuclear Medicine, Buffalo Uni­versity, U.S.A. in the preparation of this paper.

REFERENCES

1. Berg, B.C. Jr. Nuclear medicine and comple­mentary modalities in renal trauma. Semin. Nuci. Med., 1982; 12: 280.
2. Kristiansen, J.H., Andersen, K.E. H., Frederiksen, P.B., et aL The diagnosis of urinary extravasation using gamma camera scintigraphy. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., 1977; 11: 69.
3. Spigos, D.G., Tan, W., Pavel, D.G., Mozes, M., Jonasson, 0. and Capek, V. Diagnosis of urine extravasation after renal transplantation. Am. J. Roentgenol., 1977; 129: 409.
4. Bushnell, D.L., Polcyn, R.E., Uehling, D.T., et al. Scintigraphic evaluation of the urinary system in a case of severe renal trauma. J. Nuci. Med., 25, 9 : 1053-1054.\\
5. Yeh, E.L., Chiang, L.C., Meade, R.C.,et al. Radio­nuclide demonstration of urinary extravasation with ureteral obstruction. 3. Nuci. Med., 1979; 20: 236.
6. Dhawan, V., Sziklas, J.L, Spencer, R.P., et al. Surgically related extravasation of urine on bone scan. Clin. Nuci. Med., 1977;2:411.

Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees: