February 1986, Volume 36, Issue 2

Original Article

MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH INGUINAL HERNIA

Amir Qureshi  ( Surgical Unit, 1, Dow Medical College and Civil Hospital, Karachi. )
Hilaria Desa  ( Present Address: Dept. of Community Medicine, Aga Khan University of Health Sciences, Karachi. )

Abstract

Management of 1 00 patients with inguinal hernia is presented. Lack of an effective filter clinic resulted in admission of patients above the handling capacity of the unit, some of whom were unfit for surgery. As a result pre­operative stay was unduly prolonged (mean:5.5 days; range: 1.37 days). Consultants performed 3%, Senior registrars 6.3%, House surgeons 18% and Junior registrars 73% of operations. There was considerable variation in the operative tech­niques and anaesthesia employed. The efficacy of repair could not be monitored as there was no organised system of follow up.
The mean post operative stay was 7.5 days (range: 1-32 days), patients being kept in hospital until sutures were removed. Shorter stays cannot be enforced until expanded health care system is introduced. (JPMA36- 29, 1986).

INTRODUCTION

Inguinal hernia, a common surgical problem, accounted for 18% of the 560 routine admissions to Surgical Unit I of the Civil Hospital, Karachi during 1983. This paper reviews the management of the patients with inguinal hernia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of case records of the 100 patients hospitalised with inguinal hernia in Surgical Unit I of Civil Hospital, Karachi during the year 1983 was done. All but four patients underwent surgery.
Admissions policy, length of pre.operative stay, skill of the surgeon, technique of repair, type of anaesthesia used, and post.operative comp. lications were among the parameters considered in the analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 100 patients seen in this series, 83 were admitted through the Out through the Casualty Department. information regarding referrals by cians in either of these groups.
The maximum number of cases, routine as well as emergency, were seen between May and August.
The ages ranged from 3 to 82 years, 15% of the patients being over 60 years of age. There were no females in this series.
The mean duration between the appear­ance of the swelling and reporting was 4 years and 4 months (range: 1 day- 35 years); in the case of bilateral hernias (12 cases) the corresponding interval was 5 years and 2 months (range: 2 months-F4 years).
Thirty percent of the non obstructed cases complained of pain, which was of less than 6 months duration in 67% of cases.
The mean duration of hospital stay was 13 days. Pre-operative stay averaged 5.5 days (range: 1-37    days) while post operative stay averaged -7.5 days (range: 1-32 days). The majority of the patients were operated on the third day after admission. The reasons for prolonged preoperative stay are given in Table I.

Of 96 operations, 70 (73%) were performed by Junior Registrars, 17 (18%) by House Surgeons, 6 (6.3%) by Senior Registrars, ahd only three (3.1%) by the Con­sultants.
Anaesthesia employed is shown in Table II;

Majority of the patients were operated under spinal anaesthesia.
Of the 14 emergency procedures, evidence of bowel strangulation was found in seven cases. However in only one case was ileal resection performed. Simultaneous bilateral repair was done in two cases. Two orchidectomies were done, the indication in one case being injury to the vas deferens.
A Bassini repair was employed for the posterior inguinal wall in 65 cases. In two cases the upper leaf of the external oblique was sutured behind the coril. The posterior inguinal wall was repaired in 52 cases with non absorbable material (silk or nylon) while catgut was employed in 44 cases. Hernioplasty with synthetic woven polyester mesh was carried out in one case in which the hernia had recurred twice.
Post-operative complications are shown in Table III.

There was one post.operative death. The cause of sudden death in this case is not known. No information was available concerning the number of patients who developed urinary retention requiring catheterisation. No data per­taining to long term follow up was available.

DISCUSSION

The present series confirms the lack of a link between the general physician and the hos­pital, with regard to patient referral. The motiva­ting factor for seeking admission was in most patients pain rather than the presence of a sweiling alone. It is difficult to interpret the fact that emergency admissions showed the same seasonal pattern as did routine cases.
A common reason for prolonged preo­perative stay was the detection, on admission, of associated disorders that contraindicated imme­diate surgery. A complete patient profile and basic investigations obtained at a filter clinic could help to eliminate this factor. Other common reasons were:
i. the patient being passed over in favour of another while preparing the operation list, and
ii. postponement of scheduled surgery as a result of lack of operating time (the list was too long). A waiting list system could prevent admis­sions beyond the handling capacity of the unit.
It is established that the skill of the opera­ting surgeon has a direct bearing on hernia re­currence. In order to minimise recurrence it has been recommended that only senior registrars and above should be allowed to operate.1
However in the present set up, the con­siderable workload on the senior surgeons and staff may have made this an impracticable policy.
There was great diversity in terms of the type of anaesthesia and the operative technique as well as the type of suture material used- for repair
We feel that some sort of standardisation should be achieved in order to improve the effici­ency of the operating team. Increasing emphasis is being placed on Out-patient herniorrhaphy” under local anaesthesia.2
Prolonged post-operative stay was the result of a tendency to keep the patient in the ward until the stitches were removed (usually on the 7th or 8th post-operative day). This was necessary because the existing health care system does not permit patient referrals to family physi­cians, nor is there a concept of domiciliary visits. In one Swedish centre the duration of hospital stay for uncomplicated hernial repair was 5.9 day3.
Hospital beds should be thought of as dynamic rather than static entities especially
where limited beds are available. Many authors3,4  have emphasised the importance of “out patient herniorrhaphy” or short stay admission to increase turnover. Such a policy would not only result in considerable economic advantage but would also reduce the incidence of complication (obstruction) and reduce nosocomial infections.2
No data pertaining to follow ups was avail­able for this series. A Follow up is an essential part of management as it provides excellent feed back regarding the efficacy of a given technique.
Recently the Surgical Unit One of Civil Hospital Karachi has adopted a policy where by hernias are being repaired under a fixed technique using local anaesthesia. This is the first, step towards ultimate short stay surgery for hernia patients in the unit.

REFERENCES

1. Kingsnorth, A.N., Britton, B.J. and Morris, P.J. Recurrence inguinal hernia after local anaesthetic repair. Br. J. Surg., 1981; 68: 273.
2. Abdu, R. A. Ambulatory herniorrhaphy under local anaesthesia in a community hospital. Am. J. Surg., 1983; 145: 353.
3. Kornhall, S. and Olsson, A.M. Ambulatory inguinal hernia repair compared with short-stay surgery. Am. J. Surg., 1976; 132:32.
4. Ruckley, CV., Cuthbertson, C., Fenwick, N., Prescott, R.J. and Garraway, W.M. Day care after operations for hernia or varicose veins; a controlled trial. Br. J. Surg., 1978; 65:456

Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees: