March 1989, Volume 39, Issue 3

Original Article

BACTERIOLOGICAL STUDY OF GENITAL TRACT INFECTION IN PUERPERIUM

Rakhshanda Baqai  ( Research Centre, Pakistan Medical Research Council, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi. )
Talat J. Hasan  ( Research Centre, Pakistan Medical Research Council, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi. )
Sadiqa Jafarey  ( Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi. )

Abstract

Of 185 vaginal and 13 wound swabs obtained from febrile females after delivery and abortions 140 (75.6%) vaginal and 10 (76.9%) wound swabs were positive for bacteria . Infection caused by a single bacterium was found in 100 (71.4%) and mixed infection in 40 (28.5%). E.coli was mainly isolated followed by Staph. aureus and Kiebsiella. Fosfomycin was the most effective antibiotic againstE. coil and Gentamycin against Staph. aureus (JPMA 39; 70, 1989).

INTRODUCTION

Genital tract infection particularly posto­perative sepsis may arise from the endogenous flora ‘or by bacteria acquired during labor and delivery. Potentially pathogenic bacteria may be found in the vagina throughout pregnancy irrespective of socio-economic status. It is speculated that for obstetrical infection to develop other factors could be present in addition to endogenous pathogens.1 This study was done to determine the infecting organisms among febrile females after delivery and abortions in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and eighty-five high vaginal swabs and 13 swabs from abdominal wounds were collected from mothers developing puerperal pyrexia with clinical diagnosis of genital tract infection. These subjects were delivered abdomi­nally or vaginally or delivered at home or in some other hospital and admitted with fever. Patients with abortions and fever were also included. Most of the patients had been given Ampicillin approximately 12—24 hours before the collection of specimens. Vaginal and wound swabs were collected under aseptic conditions, placed in broth and immediately transported to the laboratory for examination. Direct microscopic examination was done for trichomonas vaginalis. Bacteriological ex­amination was done by inoculating the swabs on MacConkey agar, blood agar, and Sabouraud’s agar. The isolates obtained were identified on the basis of colony morphology, gram staining and biochemical reactions. Antibiotic sensitivity tests for pathogenic organisms were done by disc diffusion method.

RESULT

Seventy-six per cent vaginal swabs and 77% wound swabs were positive for growth. Infection was caused by a single bacterium in 100 (714%) while mixed infection (28.5%) was less frequent. Of 187 isolates E. coil were isolated in 88 (47%), Staph. aureus in 24 (12.8%) and Klebsiella in 21(11.2%) (Table I).

Fosfomycin was the most effective anti­biotic against E. coil and Kanamycin and Gentamy­cin against Staph. aureus (Table II).

None of vaginal swabs were positive for Trichomonas vaginalis.

DISCUSSION

In genital tract infection both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria are frequently involved but the latter could not be isolated due to some limitations. E. colt a gram negative enteric organism has frequently been implicated in obstetrical infections2,3. This was the most common pathogen in this study as well. Pathogenicity of Candida albicans is well documented. 4 It might be present in the vagina as commensal but its presence does not necessarily indicate morbidity. 5 In this study C. albicans was isolated from 7% and in others C. albicans was rarely isolated from healthy lower genital tract6. Among our cases Ampicillin was given routinely to patients admitted to the hospital but majority (90%) of E. colt infection were resistant to Ampicillin while only 18% were resistant to Fosfomycin. Therefore, it is recom­mended that vaginal swab cultures should be done routinely and its sensitivity pattern determined so that appropriate antibiotics may be used in order to reduce genital tract infections.

REFERENCES

1. White, C.A. and Koontz, F.P. Bacterial flora of the cervix during pregnancy. Obstet. GynecoL, 1968; 32 :402.
2. Swenson, R.M., Michaelson, T.C., Daly, M.J., Spaulding, E.H. Anaerobic bacterial infections of the female genital tract. Obstet. GynecoL, 1973;42:538.
3. Hall, W.L., Sobel, A; L, Jones, C.P. and Parker, R.T. Anaerobic post-operative pelvic infections. Obstet. Gynecol., 1967; 30 :1.
4. Gray, L.A.and Barnes, M.L. Vaginitis in women, diagnosis and treatment. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1965;92 :125
5. Carter, B., Jones, C.P., Creadick, R.N., Parker, R.N., Parker, R.T. and Turner, V. The vaginal fungi. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 1959; 83: 265.
6. Goplerud, C.P., Ohm, M.J. and Galask, R.P. Aerobic and anaerobic flora of the cervix during pregnancy and the puerperium. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1976; 126: 858.

Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees: