January 1989, Volume 39, Issue 1

Original Article

METHICILLIN RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS IN A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF KARACHI - A LABORATORY STUDY

Bushra Ashiq  ( Department of Microbiology, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi. )
Ali Khan Tareen  ( Department of Dermatology, Bolan Medical College, Quetta. )

Abstract

A search was made for Methicillin Resistant Strains of Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) among staph aureus cultures isolated at a teaching hospital in Karachi. Of 100 staphylococcus aureus isolated in 1987-88, 5 were MRSA, four from admitted patients and one from outpatient. These MRSA were resistant to Gentamicin as well as to other anti biotics. The presence of MRSA in the in-patients is a serious problem as it can act as reservoir to cause outbreak of colonisation and infection. No MRSA was isolated from 50 samples studied from Quetta (JPMA 39: 6 , 1989).

INTRODUCTION

Strains of Methicitlin Resistant Staphy­lococcus Aureus (MRSA) have caused outbreaks of colonization and infection in intensive care and other special units in hospitals throughout the world1. Difficulty in controlling cross infection and the alarm in having only one reserve antibio­tic Vancomycin, despite its potential toxicity available for treatment2 have led to the publica­tion of gui4elines for control by a combined working party of the Hospital Infection Society and the British Society for Antimicrobial Chem­otherapy. 3 Because of the ease with which these strains spread, the guideline call them the epidemic resistant staphylococcus aureus. Methicillin resistance was reported in staph aureusin 1959 and increased in early 19604-6. Outbreaks of hospital infection occurred in 1960s7 and then declined8. In 1976 the first outbreak of hospital infection with a strain resistant to both Methicfflin and Gentamicin was described in London6 and a few years later, in Australia there was a nation-wide outbreak of hospital infection with staphylococcus aureus resistant to Penicillin, Methicillin, Gentamicin, Cephalosporins, Erythromycin and Tetracycline. Since then outbreaks have been described in Europe9 and USA10, South Africa and the Middle East. The initiation of many hospital outbreaks has been the introduction of MRSA strain by Infected or colonised patients11-13, or hospital staff14,15. Once within a hospital, resistant staphylococcus aureus spreads like any other staphylococcus aureus predominantly by contact transfer on the hands. In order to identify and control MRSA infection outbreaks, in Karachi and Quetta, a continuous laboratory based surveillance3,16 programme has been set up. The present report describes the frequency of MRSA infection in both the cities.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Material
One hundred clinical isolates of stap­hylococcus aureus were tested from March 1987 to February 1988 in Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi and during March 1988 in Quetta for sensitivity to Methicillin.
Methods
Staphylococcus Aureus Strains: Identification of staphylococcus aureus was based on colonial morphology on blood agar plates incubated at 37° overnight. Gram staining and catalase test (after subculture on nutrient agar media) were done. Gram positive cocci, catalase positive (staphy­lococci) were confirmed as staph aureus by slide and the coagulase (plasma broth) tests. (Coagulase tests is considered sufficient for research purposes for this kind of work). Two separate colonies of each culture were selected for identification and antimicrobial sensitivity. All tests were performed by Standard methods17. Primary plates were reincubated for 48 hours to isolate any further growth of staph aureus.
Antibiotic Susceptibility Tests
Antimicrobial susceptibility screening tests were performed on blood agar by the stoke disk diffusion method18 using Gentamicin 10 ug, Tetracycline 25 ug disks. The ‘Oxford’ strain of S. aureus NCTC 6571 was the control organism18 in antibiotic susceptibility tests. Methidillin sensitivity with 10 ug disk was done on separate 5 percent salt agar medium plate (Nutrient agar with added 5% Nacl), incubated at 37° for 24 hours and results read. Inoculum of staph aureus which gave confluent growth at 37° after 24 hours was employed (considered best for Methicillin Sensitivity). Oxford Strain’ of Staph aureus NCTC 6571 was control organism’ 8 All apparently resistant cultures to Methicillin were again inoculated from Methiciflin sensitivity plate to fresh blood agar plate and organism again identified as Staph Aureus. Disk diffusion sensitivity tests to Methidillin and Gentamicin repeated from single well isolated separate colony. Those isolates that were resistant to Methi­cfflin were then tested for sensitivity to wide range of other antibiotics on diagnostic sensitivity test agar (iso-sensitest agar Oxoid Ltd.) by Stoke Method18 with the following disks: Penicillin 1.5 units, Tetracycline 30 ug, Erythromycin 15 ug, Gentamicin 10 ug, Fusidic acid 5 ug, Chloromy­citin 10 ug, Trimethoprim 1.25 ug, Sulphame­thoxazole 100 ug, Rifampicin 30 ug, Vancomycin 30 ug, Streptomycin 25 ug, Ofloxacin 5 ug, and Narfioxacin 10 ug. Single disks from oxoid were used. Plates were incubated at 37° overnight and results read. Ten Methicfflin sensitive staph aureus strains were saved and disc sensitivity to all above antibiotics was done for comparison purposes.

RESULTS

Isolation of Methicilhin Resistant Staph Aureus (MRSA)
Five Methidillin resistant Staph Aureus strains were isolated from 100 available clinical specimens. All positive samples belonged to males in whom the sample was sent as pus for culture and sensitivity. Four MRSA were isolated in 1987 and one in 1988. All isolates of MRSA were also resistant to gentamicin so called GMRSA (Genta­micin Methicillin Resistant Staph Aureus). Four were isolated from hospital inpatients. The MRSA were isolated from surgical wards, chest ward, outpatients department and an unspecified ward. None of 50 isolates of Staph Aurèus strains from Quetta were Methicillin resistant. Isolation of MRSA (GMRSA) from out-patients One resistant organism was isolated from a patient attending an outpatients department for chronic leg ulcer. Nd information was available regarding past history of any hospital admission. Antimicrobial Sensitivity Tests Results of disk diffusion sensitivity tests with 2 strains of MRSA are shown in Table.

Three specimens were not available, for study by the time all sensitivity disks arrived. MRSA strains were sensitive to Rifampicin, Erythromycin, Chloromycetin, Fusidic acid and Vancomycin and to new quinolones. They were resistant to Penicillin, Tetracycline, Streptomycin, Gentamicin. Sensitivity to Sulphonamide and Trimethoprim was variable. Antimicrobial sensitivity to 10 Methicillin sensitive strains isolated from various specimens were also done.

DISCUSSION

Methicillin is a valuable drug for the treat­ment of serious staphylocal infections, so the appearance of MRSA strains is viewed with utmost concern. JPMC receives patients from throughout Karachi City and neighbouring towns; so patients with MRSA once admitted can act as reservoir for cross infection. The detection of first patient with MRSA in a hospital in-patient population is of extreme importance as this can serve as reservoir to cause outbreak of colonization and infection by these organisms19. The danger of such strains has been illustrated by major outbreaks of staphy­lococcus sepsis - in various hospital units, 10,20. With the identification of the first MRSA positive patient immediate screening programme should be started an other patients and hospital staff. 3,19  Such an screening programme could not be carried out due to limited available facilities. For the control of MRSA, the working party of Hospital Infection Society and the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy3,19 have set up recommendations which include avoidance of entry of an index case into an unaffected hospital, continuous laboratory based surveillance for the detection of MRSA, prompt and complete defini­tion of the outbreak to include staff nasal carriage and an intensive programme for reducing the reservoir by early discharge of known cases, the isolation of positive patients and the use of anti­septies for colonised skin and superficial sites, i.e. 2% mupiracin nasal ointment four times a day for 5 days, mupiracin skin ointment for skin lesions, 4% chlorohexidine gluconate shampoo daily, triclosan bath concentrates daily. Staff carriers (if only nasal carriers) may be allowed back to work after one day’s treatment with mupiracin (3 weekly negative swabs for wide spread carriage).

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I am grateful to Dr. Khawaja Abdul Jalil, Clinical Pathologist/Assistant Professor, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi, for providing laboratory space.

REFERENCES

1. Sanderson, P3. Staying one Jump ahead of resistant staphylococcus aureus (Editorial). Br. Med. J., 1986; 293573.
2. What’s to be déne about resistant staphylococcus (Editorial). Lancet, 1985; 2:189.
3. Ayliffe, G.A.J. Guideline for the control of epidemic Methicillin resistant staphylococcus­aureus. Report of combined working party of the Hospital Infection Society and British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy J. Hosp. Infect., 1986; 7: 193.
4. Jevons, M.P., Coe, A.W. and Parker, M.T. Methicillin resistance in staphylococci. Lancet, 1963; 1:904.
5. Benner, E.J. and Kayser, F.H. Growing clinical significance of methicillin resistant staphylococ­cus aureus. Lancet, 1968; 2 741.
6. Shanson, D.C., Kensit, J.G. and Duke, R. Out break of hospital infection with a strain of staphy lococcus aureus resistant to gentamicin and methicillin. Lancet, 1976; 2:1347.
7. Methicillin-resistant staphylococci (Editorial). Lancet, 1968; 2 : 759.
8. Ayliffe, G.AJ., Lilly, H.A. and Lowbury, E.J.L. Decline of Hospital Staphylococcus? Incidence of multi.resistant staph aureus in three Birmingham Hospitals. Lancet, 1979; 1:538.
9.  Bradley, J.M., Noone, P.,Townsend, D.E. and Grubb, W.B. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a London Hospital. Lancet, 1985; 1:1493.
10. Boyce, J.M. and Causey, W.A. Increasing occurrance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in United States. Infect. Control, 1982;3: 377.
11. Shanson, D.C., Johnstone, D. and Midgley, J. Control of a hospital outbreak of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections; value of an isolation unit. J. Hosp. infect., 1985; 6:285.
12. Saroglou, A., Gromer, M. and Bisno, A.L. Methicillin- resistant Staphylococcus aureus; inter­state spread of nosocomial infection with emer­gence of gent-meth resistant strains. Infect. Control, 1980; 1:81.
13. Schaefler, S., Jones, D., Perry, W, Baradet, T., Mayr, E. and Ramperrad, C. Methicillin resis­tant staphylococcus aureus strains in New York City Hospitals. inter-hospital spread of resistant strains of type 88. Clin.Microbiol.,1984; 20:536.
14. Shanson, D.C. and McSwiggan, DA. Operation Theatre acquired infection with a gent-resistant strain of staphylococcus aureus: Outbreak in two Hospitals attributed to one Surgeon. J. Hosp. Infect., 1980; 171 —172.
15. Cookson, BD., Ferrington, M., Webster, M.and Philip, I. Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus. Lancet, 1985; 2:2 18.
16. Cafferkey, M., Hone, R., Falkiner, F.R., Keane, C.T. and Pomeroy, H. Gentamicin and methi­cillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Doublin hospitals; clinical and laboratory studies. J. Med. Microbiol., 1983; 16:117.
17. Lennette, E.H. et a!. Manual of clinical microbio­logy. 3rd ed. Washington, American Society for Microbiology, 1980; p. 83, 1000.
18. Stoke, EJ. and Ridway, G.L. Clinical bacterio­logy. 5th ed. London, Arnold, 1980, P. 200.
19. Casweel, M.W. Epidemiology and control of the “Modern’s Methicillinresistant staphylococcus aureus. J. Hosp. Infect., 1986; 7 (Supplement A):
20. Hone, R., Cafferkey, M., Keane, C.T., Haste­Barry, M., Moorhouse, E., Carrol, R., Martin, F. and Ruddy, R. Bacteraemia in Doublin due to gentamicin— resistant-staphylococcus aureus. J.Hosp. Infect., 1981;2 :119.

Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees: