By Author
  By Title
  By Keywords

November 1991, Volume 41, Issue 11

Case Reports


Naim-Ur-Rahman  ( Division of Neurosurgesy, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. )

The author sustained an injury to his right recurrent laryngeal nerves during an operation (Smith Robinson procedure) for cervical disc disease. This painful reality became apparent immediately after operation in an unmistakable and dramatic way by a simple maneuver. Subsequently this maneuver was shown to be a useful and dependable clinical test in similar situations.


The patient suspected of having a recent vocal cord palsy is asked to perform Valsalva’s Maneuver. This maneuver consists of opening the eustachian tube by raising air pressure in the nasopharynx. With the lips closed and the nostrils pinched closed with finger and thumb, the patient is asked to blow out. Simultaneous closure of the vocal cords and cricopharyngeal sphincter leads to rise of air pressure in the nasopharynx causing opening of the eustachian tubes and thereby allowing the entry of air to the middle ear (Figure 1).

Characteristic sound (click) is appreciated by the patient when air inflates the middle ear. When the same maneuver is performed in a patient with recent recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis the vocal cords fail to approximate in the midline. The air then follows the path of least resistance and hence gushes down the trachea through the incompetent laryngeal inlet, producing characteristic hoarse croaking sound (Figure 2).

This sound is audible to the patient as well as to the examiner with stethoscope placed over the trachea. Simultaneously there is palpable distension of the trachea. Because of the air leak down the larynx, sufficient positive nasopharyngeal pressure cannot be built to inflate the middle ear. Failure to open the eustachian tube and aerate the middle ear and presence of audible gush of air down the trachea during this maneuver indicates a positive test. When positive, this test is almost pathognominic of vocal cord paralysis.


The etiology of vocal cord palsy is usually traumatic due to surgical damage to the recurrent laryngeal nerve during operations on the neck and adjacent areas; thyroid surgery being the commonest cause1,2. Poor surgical technique, oedema, hematoma, stretching, over-close dissection, monopolar forceps coagulation in the area of the nerve and inopportune suction are the known reasons for such trauma3. Diagnosis of vocal cord paralysis is difficult and usually missed during immediate and early postoperative period due to the following reasons:
1. Unilateral paralysis may cause little trouble with the voice and laryngoscopy is not practised as a matter of course3. In fact, laryngoscopy may be inadvisable imme­diately after operations on cervical spine, e.g., anterior fusion.
2. Immediately after operation and during first few days, there may be oedema of the vocal folds due to the manipulations during surgery and from intubation. This may confuse the picture and make it difficult to determine the exact cause of dysphonia and hoarseness.
For these reasons vocal cord paralysis may go unnoticed for some time. In one series4, fewer than one-fourth of the cases had their paralyses diagnosed in the immediate postoperative period. Early recognition of vocal cord paralysis may be important as it may prompt the surgeon to re-explore the wound. If a recurrent laryngeal nerve is found to be included in a suture ligature and released, there is a possibility that normal function may return. Immediate postoperative decompression of the recurrent laryngeal nerve has had some success in the past. A transected nerve may be repaired by end-to-end anastomosis or interpositional nerve graft, with occasional satisfactory results. In this setting, a simple clinical test like the one described, may help in an early diagnosis and will differentiate the dysphonia caused by vocal cord paralysis from the hoarseness due to vocal cord oedema. It is suggested that this should be the first examination in a case of post-thyroidectomy/post-cervical surgery dys­phonia. It may provide a useful screening test in the immediate postoperative period to be followed by a more eleborate diagnostic work up consisting of laryngoscopy with stroboscopy, qualitative and quantitative phonatory measurements, electromyography and orthophonic ex­amination3. As the time goes by the opposite vocal cord starts compensating and this test becomes negative. The voice comes back - a voice that is never qualitatively as strong or effortless or pleasurable as before but sufficient, I guest, to carry on. In the long term unilateral paralysis is not so benign3. A certain compensation (afforded by the mobiisation of the opposite cord) and improved therapy may lessen the disability but as yet, man is powerless against the difficulties of phonation that can prevent the exercise of certain professions. Sometimes surgery, not only aggravates previous symptoms, but also adds new problems of its own, perhaps even more resistant to treatment His surgery is still a matter of regret for the author, who must view the passing of his hard-earned skills somewhat wistfully, as he shifts his gaze to the barren prospect of the future.


1. Tucker, H.M. Vocal cord paralysis 1979: eliology and management Laryngoscope, 1980;90:585.
2. Tucker, H.M. Reinnervation of the paralyzed larynx; a review, in head and neck surgery. St Louis, Mosby, 1979; Vol. 1, p. 235.
3. Remade, M. and Millet, B. Recurrentnerve paralysis after thyroidectomy. Therapeutic approach. Acta Otorhinolaryngol. Beig., 1987;41:910.
4. Newman, M.H. and Work, W.P. Arytenoidectomy revisited. Laryngoscope, 1976; 86:840.

Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees: