By Author
  By Title
  By Keywords

June 1991, Volume 41, Issue 6

Original Article


Huma Qureshi  ( PMRC Research Centre, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi-35. )
Shahid Kamal  ( Atomic Energy Medical Centre, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi-35. )
R.A. Khan  ( Atomic Energy Medical Centre, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi-35. )
Sarwar J. Zuberi  ( PMRC Research Centre, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi-35. )
Syed Ejaz Alam  ( PMRC Research Centre, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi-35. )


99mTc-Sn colloid scintigraphy was found to be a simple and rapid method of differentiating cirrhosis from IPH. The results of the present study are in accordance with our previous findings8. Being a comparatively less invasive test than liver biopsy, its usefulness would be enhanced in cases where liver biopsy is contraindicated or difficult to perform (Massive ascites, altered coagula­tion profile, small shrunken liver and patient’s reluc­tance to undergo biopsy). 1PM is a very well recognized clinical entity in Japan9 and India11 but is very infrequent in the western countries12. Although the actual frequen­cy of IPH is not known in Pakistan but with the increasing awareness of this disease entity, lot of new patients are being diagnosed. Unlike cirrhosis where liver is diseased, liver in 1PM is almost normal, therefore the disease runs a protracted course with good prognosis13-16 and has a high survival rate (87%)17 following leinorenal shunt and sclerotherapy (100%)15. In view of good prognosis in IPH there is a need to diagnose and treat these cases as early as possible; this further accentuates the need to properly identify these cases, for which scintigraphy technique may be used initially to differentiate cirrhosis from noncirrhotic group and once diagnosed, patients with 1PM may be subjected to further tests to confirm the diagnosis. Of the various pathophysiological parameters evaluated, histology followed by clinical diagnosis showed a good correlation to the ratio of the slope of integral.


Thirty-seven cases of portal hypertension with endoscopically proven oesophageal varices underwent liver biopsy to determine the etiology of portal hypertension Of the total, 19 had cirrhosis and 18 idiopathic portal hypertension (IPH). Later all these patients underwent Tc mSn colloid, static and dynamic scintigraphy of the liver and spleen. Ratios of the area and of the integral and slope of the integral for liver and spleen were calculated to see if any of these ratios can differentiate cirrhotics from IPH. Significant difference (P <0.001) was noted in the ratio of the area (L/S) in both patients and controls, but the ratios of the integral and the slope of the integral were not only significantly different (P < 0.001) in the patients and controls but also in the two groups of patients (cirrhosis and IPH). The sensitivity of this test when compared with the histology was 58% for both cirrhosis and IPH but when compared with clinical diagnosis it was 76% for cirrhosis and 62% for idiopathic group. Therefore by adding the above mentioned test in the routine study of liver scintigraphy in patients with portal hypertension, further differentiation of cirrhotic group can be done from the idiopathic group (JMPA 41:126, 1991).


Radioactive colloids are universally used for the evaluation of reticuloendothelial cell function of the liver and spleen in various hepatobiliary diseases. For the estimation of liver perfusion and function, apart from performing the static imaging, the dynamic imaging has also been used with good results1. Quantitative assess­ment of hepatic and splenic blood flow by indices derived from the time-activity curves has now been well established in normal and patients with various acute and chronic liver diseases2-7 . In our preliminary report on the technique, we were able to differentiate the cirrhotic from the idiopathic portai hypertensive (IPH) group using the above mentioned technique8. IPH is a clinical disorder of unknown etiology characterized by splenomegaly, anaemia and portal hypertension. Its diagnostic criteria include9 normal to near normal liver function test, presence of varices, decrease in one or more formed elements of blood, liver scan not suggestive of cirrhosis, patent portal and extra hepatic portal vein, grossly non-cirrhotic liver, slightly elevated WHVP and portal fibrosis not suggestive of cirrhosis. Though all these criteria are not necessary for the diagnosis of IPH but exclusion of cirrhosis is a must. In view of a higher frequency of idiopathic portal hypertension (IPH) in Pakistan, and with the obvious difficulties in differentiating cirrhotics from the IPH group, the present study was done in a larger sample size to confirm our initial findings and to authenticate the introduction of this test in the routine clinical environment for the workup of portal hypertension.


History and physical findings of clinically suspected cases of portal hypertension were entered in a standard proforma and their blood taken for complete picture, prothrombin time and standard liver function tests. All patients had endoscopically confirmed oesophageal varices, and had ultrasonography and liver biopsy done to determine the etiology of portal hypertension. The diagnosis of idiopathic portal hypertension9 and cir­rhosis10 was made on histology in all except 4 cases, where only clinical, biochemical and ultrasonographic findings were taken into consideration. Patients were later sent to the nuclear medicine department for scin­tigraphy, where the examiner (SK) was not informed about their histological diagnosis.
Patients were placed supine beneath a LFOV gamma camera (Scintronex 480) so that liver spleen and heart were included in an anterior image. An injection of 4mci (150 MBq) 99mTc tin colloid was administered in­travenously as a bolus dose. Using an online computer system (Data General Nova 4x), digital images were recorded in a 64 x 64 matrix at 0.5 sec intervals for 240 seconds after injection. Anterior and posterior images of 1,500k counts each were also recorded at 15 minutes to obtain the static part of the study.
Thirty-seven portal hypertensives and 15 normal controls were studied. Static anterior and posterior im­ages were evaluated as in routine scan. ROIs (Regions of interest) were drawn around the liver and spleen on the static pictures and the number of pixels encompassed noted to derive the ratio of liver to spleen area (AL/S). Time-activity curves for the liver, spleen and repre­sentative portion of heart were generated from the dynamic study by placing suitable ROTs. The total in­tegrated counts of the liver and spleen time-activity curves and the slope of the integral were computed to derive the liver to spleen ratio of integral (IL/S) and ratio of slope of integral (SIL/S). Statistical evaluation was done using student’s ‘t’ test and screening test10 for determining the sensitivity.


Thirty-seven portal hypertensives with endoscopi­cally confirmed oesophageal varices were included in the study. Of the total, there were 16 males and 21 females with a mean age of 55.2 years (range 7-65 years). The cause of portal hypertension on histology was cir­rhosis in 16 and IPH9 in 15 cases. In six cases biopsy was either not done or was inclusive; therefore other parameters like biochemical findings and ultrasonog­raphy were taken into consideration to make a presump­tive diagnosis; of these 3 were thought to have cirrhosis and 3 IPH. With histology taken as the diagnostic test to differentiate cirrhosis from IPH, various parameters like age, sex, history of jaundice, G.I. bleeding, as cites/oedema, splenomegaly, child’s grading for the severity of liver disease, variceal gradings were com­pared in the two groups.

Table I gives the demographic profile of patients with portal hypertension alongwith clinical, histological and scintigraphic ratios. Although a significant dif­ference (P< 0.001 ) was found in the ratio of the area (AL/S) in patients than in controls but no difference was found between the two groups of patients i.a, cirrhotics and IPH. However, the ratio of the integral (I L/S) and the slope of the integral (SI L/S) were not only sig­nificantly different (P <0.001) between patients and con­trols but also between cirrhotics and 1PM (Table II).

Patients having a ratio of slope of the integral of less than or equal to one were mostly cirrhotics and those having a ratio of over one had 1PM. 99mTc-Sn colloid dynamic and static time activity curves were drawn in all these cases. Typical variations were seen in the uptake of the isotope by liver and spleen in cirrhosis and idiopathic portal hypertension making the differentiation rapid and easy. The static and dynamic time activity curves in cirrhosis, IPH and a normal control are shown in Figures 1,2 and 3.

When the diagnostic sensitivity of this method was compared with the histology in differentiating cirrhoucs from 1PM, a sensitivity of 58% was achieved for both cirrhosis and IPH, giving a high diagnostic yield for histology. But in cases in whom biopsy is contraindi­cated or who refuse to get a histology done, the sen­sitivity of this method when compared with clinical diagnosis was 76% for cirrhosis and 62% for 1PM, show­ing a good diagnostic yield.


1. Japan, G.V. Dynamic studies of liver function with rsdioiaotopea, in dynamic atudies with rsdioisotopes in medicine. New York, Uniputa Joe, 1971, p. 373.
2. Kashiwage, T., Koizumi, T. and Kimurs, K. Computer snalysia of the time, aclivity cur­ ves satociated with the liver using non linear regression anslytia. Jpn. 3. Nucl. Med., 1983; 20: 321.
3. Nabeahima, K, 5ugimura, K, Itoh, K et al. Analysis of hepatic flow curve by Tc-99m­ Sn Colloid (Abat). Jpn. 3. NucI. Med., 1983; 20: 561.
4. Matauo, H., Suzuki, S., Kogs, T. et al. Rsdionuclide examination of the hepatoma (abst). )pn. J. Nucl. Med., 1983; 20: 558.
5. Seto, H., Futatsuya, R., Kamer, T. et al. Quantitative assessment of portal venous flow ratio by 1st pass hepatic angiography with Tc-99m-Sn colloid, using height ratio techni­que (abst).pn.J. Nuci. Med., 1983; 20: Sal.
6. Narabayashi, I., Nishiyama, S., Sugimura, K. et aL Quantitative assessment of hepatic and splenic blood flow detected by Tc-99m- Sn colloid liver Scintigraphy. Jpn. J. Nucl. Med., 1983; 20: 625.
7. Ogawa, T., Sugura, K., Nagase, K. et al. Evaluation of infantile liver cirrhosis by RI hepatogram using 99m Tc04. Jpn. 3. NucI, Med., 1985; 22: 895.
8. Kamal, S., Lodi, T., Qureshi, H., Zuberi, S.). and Khan, R.A. Tc-99m-Sn. Colloid dynamic and static scintigraphic evaluation of patients with portal hypertension. Jpn. Soc. Nucl. Med., 1986; 23: 389.
9. Okuda, K. Epidemiology of idiopathic portal hypertension, in idiopathic portal byper­tension. Tokyo, University Tokyo Press, 1983, p. 3.
10.  Morton, R.F. and Hebel, JR. The Study guide to epidemiology and biostatistics, Bal­timore, University Park Press, 1979, p. 60.
11.  Sherlock, S. The portal venous system and portal hypertension in diseases of the liver and biliary system. 6th ed. Oxford, Blackwell, 1981, p. 13.
12. Boyer, J.L., Sengupta, K.P., Biswas, S.K., Pal, N.C., Mallick, K.C.B., Iber, F.L and Basy, A.K. Idiopathic portal hypertension. Comparison with the portal hypertension of cir­ rhosis and extrahepatic portal vein obstruction. Ann. Intern. Med., 1967; 66: 41.
13. Same, S.K., Bhargawa, S., Nath, NO., Talevar, JR., Nouyak, NC., Tandon, B.N. and Wig, K.L., Noncirrhotic portal fibrosis. Am. J. Med., 1971; 51: 160.
14. Sarin, S.K., Sachdeva, G. and Nanda, R. Follow-up of patients after variceal eradica­tion. A comparison of pstienLs with cirrhosis, non cirrhotic portal fibrosis and ex­trahepatic obstruction. Ann. Surg,, 1986; 204: 78.
15. Tandon, B.N., Nundy, S. and Nayak, N.C. Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension in north­ern India. Clinical features and liver function tests, in Tokyo, indiopathic portal hypertension. Edited by, Univ. Tokyo Press, 1983, p. 377.
16. Nundy, S. and Tandon, B.N. The proximal leino-renal shunt in the management of varices in idiopathic portal hypertension. Okuda K, Omata M. Tokyo, Univ. Tokyo Press, 1983, p. 535.

Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees: