A major aim of clinical microbiologists over the last century has been to demonstrate the presence of pathogenic microorganisms in clinical or pathological specimens associated with infectious diseases. With the development of molecular genetics over the last 20 years, new technologies have become available that allow morn sensitive and specific determinations to be made in a short period of time. The latest development in this area is a technique of gene amplification known as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) which enabled clinicians to diagnose difficult pathogens. PCR is an in vitro technique of producing copies of a given gene sequence so that within few hours 106 copies of a single gene can be produced. The pioneenng work in this field was done by the members of Cetus Corpomtion who described a rapid prenatal test for sickle-cell anaemia1. The test was based on the ability to identify a single base mutation within the entire foetal genome. Soon the PCR was used widely because of its simplicity and potential range of applications including the study of infectious diseases. To perform PCR, a target DNA sequence tobe amplified must first be chosen, typically several hundred to thousands base pairs (bp) in length. For example, to detect H. pylori in a clinical sample, a region of H. pylori urease A gene might be amplified2. A pair of synthetic oligc nucleotide primers (single stranded DNA oligonucleotide pri; :r of 10-20 bp in length) are required, one complementary to each of the targeted DNA strands and flanking the target sequence. At the start of the PCR all reagents (e.g., oligonucleotide primers, deoxyribonucleotides, PCR buffer and DNA polymerase) are added to the incubation mixture. A specimen to be amplified (human, bacterial, fi.ingal, plant and/or viral DNAs) was added in the last to incubation mixture. As expected PCR-based diagnostic test developments focussed initially towards the organism for which existing methods are eiher very time consuming, produce ambiguous results, or inadequate or simply not available. For example, Mycobacterium tuberculosis testing needs weeks of culture; serological testing of lyme disease produce ambiguous results and sensitive direct testing for the human retroviruses is not possible by other means. As with most diagnostic techniques, PCR is appropriate for detection of some infectious diseases, but may not be for others. In some cases, it will not be of practical diagnostic use, but will provide valuable epidemiological information. The criteria which might indicate that PCR would be useful are: i) that available methods are not ideal in terms of cost, time, specificity, sensitivity or have technical difficulties and ii) that it is possible to obtain genetic material (DNA or RNA) inaclinical sample. Although there are unlimited uses for the PCR, its application to study viral infections can be divided into following categories: 1) diagnosis of viral infections in the failure of conventional tests; 2)to understand viral pathogenesis; 3) to elucidate viral causes of nomniectious diseases and 4) diagnosis of simultaneous infections with closely related viral pathogens. So far the greatest impact has been made in diagnosing viral infections, e.g., hepatitis A3, B4 and C virus5, cytomegalovirus6, Epstein Barr virus7, Herpes Simplex virus8, human papilloma virus8, Pavovirus10, Rotavirus11, HIV-l12, HIV-213, HTLV-I14, HTLV-ii15, Enterovirus16, Influenza virus17, Mumps virus18. The extension of PCR to other infectious diseases has been slower. Many of the species for which PCR was developed were difficult or impossible to grow, or other available methods are inadequate. Amongbactenal pathogens diagnostic PCR was reported for M. tuberculosis19, M. leprac20, Botrelia burgdorgeri21, Treponema pallidum22, Legionella pneumophila23, Shigella24, H. pylori2 Bordetella pertusis25, Clostridium difficile26, Enterotoxigenic Eschenchia coil27, Mycoplasma pneumoniae28, Chiamydia trachomatis29 and Rickettsia rickettsii30. PCR was also developed for some of the parasitic 2pathogens, e.g., Toxoplasma gondii31 and Trypnosoma cruzi32. Despite the development of diagnostic PCR for many microorganisms, PCR is still a research test and limited to large hospital and specialized laboratories. Although the promises and expectations of PCR-based diagnostic tests are great, they will not be totally useful without significant advances in instruments and automation. On the other hand, a cost effective and clinically useful system needs to be designed which can amplify and discriminate multiple organisms and gene system simultaneously. For example, a liver panel might consist of tests for hepatitis A, B, C, D and E viruses, cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus. This can be done by the development of panel of primer pairs that support discrete amplification of above mentioned organisms simultaneously. If molecular diagnosticians want to revolutionize diagnostic microbiology, they must offer a product which is not only specific, but must be clinically useful for primary care provider.
1. Saiki, R.K., Scharf. S., Faloona, F., et a!. Enzymatic amplication of beta-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia. Science, 1985;230: 1350-1354.
2. Clayton, CL., Kleanthouse, P.J., Morgan, D.D., et a!. Sensitive delection of Helicobacter pylon byusing polymerase chain reaction. J. Clin. Microbiol., 1992;30:192-200.
3. Jansen, R.W., Siegl, G. and Lemon, S M. Molecular epidemiology of human hepatitis A virus defined by an antigen-capture polymerase chain reaction method. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.U.S.A., 1990;87:2867-2871.
4. Lazrul, D., Guige, F, Sninsky, J.J., etat Detectionofhepatitis B virus sequences macrum by usinginvitro enzymatic amplification.). Vitrol, Methods. I 988;20:227-237.
5. Weiner. A. J., Kuo, CL, Bradley, D.W,et al. Detection ofhepatitia C viral sequence in non-A, non-Bhepatitis. Lancet, 1990;335:1-3.
6. Demmler, G.J., Buffone, GJ., Schimbor, C.M., eta!. Detection ofcytomega!ovirusin wine from newborns by using polymerase chain reaction DNA amplification. J. Infect Dis., 1988;158:1177-1184.
7. Sailo, I., Serveniw, B., Cexnpton, t eta!. Detection of Epstein-Ban vines by polymerase chain reaction in blood and tissue biopsies from patients with Sjogren\\\'s syndrome. J. Dip.Med.,1989;169:2191-2198.
8. Brice, S.L., Krzenien, D., Weston, W.L., eta!. Detection of herpes simplex virus DNA in cutaneouslesions of erythema multiform.). Invest Dennatol., 1993:183-187.
9. Sahihata, D., Pu, YE., Gupta, LW, eta!. Detection of human papillomavirus in norma! and dysplastic tissue by polymerase chain reaction. Lab., Invest 1988;59:555-559.
10. Sa!imans, M.M., Holsappel, S., Van de Rijke, F.M., at a!. Rapid detection of human parvovirus B19 DNA by dot-hybridization and the polymerase chain reaction. J.Virol Methods, 1989;23: 19-28.
11. Xu, L., Harbour, D. and McRae, M. A. The application of polymerase chain ceaction to the detection of rotaviruses in faeces.). Wol Methods, 1990;27:29-37.
12. Ou, C.Y, Kwolç S., Mitchell, SW. eta!. DNA amplification for direct detection of HIV-J ub DBAofperiphera! blood mononuclear cells. Science. 1988;239:295-297.
13. Rayfield, M., DeCock, K., Heywsrd, W. eta!. Mixedhureanitnenunodeficiencyvirus (lIly) infection in an individual:demonstration of both HIV type 2 proviral sequences by using polymecasechain reaction.J. Infect. Dis., 1988;158: 1170- 1176.
14. Abbott, M.A., Poiesz, B.)., Byrne, B.C. eta!. Enzymatic gene amplification: qualitative and quantitative methods’ for detecting proviral DNA amplified in vitro. 3. Infect Dis., 1988;158:1158- 1169.
15. Ehelich, GD., Glaser, J.B., LaVigne, IC, eta!. Preva!ence of human T-cell leukemia/lymphoma virus (HTLV) type 11 infection among high eisk individuals:type-specific identifiestionHTLVsbypolymerase chain reaction. Blood, 1989;74: 1658-1664:
16. Rotbart HA. Enzymatic RNA amplification of the enterovtruses. J. Clin. Microbiol.,1990;167:425-430.
17. Beesaound, A., Wttconsb, 3., Pourzand, C. et at Rapid detection of influenza virus HI by the polyineeasechsinreaction. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Contmun., 1990;71:987-990.
18. Foraey, T., Mawan, J.A., Yates, P.). et a!.Differentistion of vaccine seal wildmumpa viruses using the polymerase chain reaotionsnd dideoxynucleotide sequencing. J. Get Virol., 1990;71 :987-990.
19. Beisson-Noel, A., Gicquel, B., Lecossier, D. et a!. Rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis by amplification of mycobacterial DNAin clinical samples. Lancet, 1989;ii:1069-1071.
20. Hartskeerl, R. A., de Wit, M. Y. and Master, P. R. Polymerase chain reaction for the detection of mycobacterium leprae. 3. Gen. Microbiol., 1989;135:2357-2364.
21. Rosa, P. A. and Schwan, T. 0. A specific and sensitive sassy for the Lyme disease spirochete Borrelis burgdorferi using the polymerase chain reaction. J. Infect. Dis., 1989;160:1018-1029.
22. Noocdhoek, 0.1. , Wades, B., van det Sluis, J.J. et al. Polymerase chain reaction sod synthetic DNA probes: a means of distinguishing the causative agents of syphilis and yaws? Infect Immun., 1990;58:2011-2013.
23. Strenbach, M.N., Fa!kow, S., Tompkins, L. S. et a!. Species- specific detection of Legionella pneumophils in water by DNA amplification and hybridization.J.Clin. Microbiol., 1989;27:1257-1261.
24. Frankel, 0., Girton, J. A., Valmassoi, J. et a!. Multi-gene amplification: simultaneous detection of three virulence-genes in diarrhoea! stool. Mol Microbiol., 1989;3:1729-1734.
25. Housrd, S., Hackel, C., Heezog, A. eta!. Specific identification of Bordetella pertusis by the polymerese chain reaction. Res. Microbiol., 1989;140:447-487.
26. Wren, B., Clayton, C. sndTabaqchali, S. Rapid identification of toxigenic Closteidium diffacilebypolymerase chsinreaction. Lancet, 1990;335:423.
27. Olive, D. M. Detection of enterotoxigeneic Escherichia coli after polymersse chain reaction amplification with a thermostable DNA polymerase. J. Clin. Microbiol., 1989;27:261-265.
28. Bernet, C., Qarret, M., de Barbeyrac, B. eta!. Detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae by using the polymerase chain reaction. J. Clin. Microbiol., 1989:27:2492-2496.
29. Dean, D. Pant, CR. and O\\\'Hanley, P. Improved sensitivity of s modified polymerase chainreaction amplifiedDNA probein 6comparison with seriial tissue culture passage for detection of 2Chlsmydia tcschomstis in conjuctiva! specimens from NepaL Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., 1990:12:133-137.
30. Tzianabot, T., Andereon, BE. and McDade, J.E. Detection of Rickettsia aickettsi DNA in clinica! specimens byusing polymerase chain reactiontechnology. I. dIm. Microbiol., 1989;27:2866-2866.
31. Ssvva, D., Morris, J.C., Johnson, J.D. et sI. Polymerase chain reaction for detection of Toxoplasma gondii. 3. Med. Microbiol., 1990:32:25-31.
32. Moser, D. R., ICirchhoff, L. V., Doneelson, J.E. et al , Detection of Trypnosoms cruzi by DNA amplification using the polymerase chain reaction. 3. Clin. Microbiol., 1989;27: 1477-1482.