Vinita Singh ( Research Lab. Department of Biochemistry, L.L.R.M. Medical College, Meerut (250004), India. )
S. Asif Zaidi ( Research Lab. Department of Biochemistry, L.L.R.M. Medical College, Meerut (250004), India. )
VS. Singh ( Research Lab. Department of Biochemistry, L.L.R.M. Medical College, Meerut (250004), India. )
Serum and biliary lipoproteins, total cholesterol (Tc) and triglycerides (TG) were measured in patients with gallstones and in those without gallstones. Serum and biliary LDLc, TG and Tc were significantly higher (P<0.001) in cases having gall stones than those without stones while HDLc were low (P<0.001) in those with stones. No difference was found in very low density lipoproteins (VLDLc) in the two groups. Present data showed that there is a statistically significant correlation of serum and biliary lipoproteins specifically LDLc and HDLC (r=+.67 and r=+.56). This report shows that serum HDLc (67.42%) and LDLc (70.28%) play a more critical role in comparison to total cholesterol (59.43%) and triglyceride (57.15%) levels in the formation of gallstone (JPMA 47:253, 1997).
Gallstones (OS) are formed when there is a characteristic precipitation of excess cholesterol as a result of production of lithogenous bile. Although, the source ofbiliaiy cholesterol has not been established, it has been suggested that scram cholesterol primarily free cholesterol from HDL is the preferential source in man1. A positive correlation between the total biliary acids and serum high density lipoproteins (HDLc) in patients with a rapid nucleation time (P=O.O 128) supports that HDLc is devoted primarily to bile acid synthesis2. While much information is available on total cholesterol, triglyceride, bile acids in serum, little or no information exists on lipoproteins in bile. We, therefore, conducted a study onlipoproteins inbile and serum of patients with gallstones and those without gallstones to establish a correlation between biliary and serum lipoproteins. We aso, investigated the relationship of serum and biliaiy lipoproteins with the production of lithogenous bile (supersaturated with cholesterol) if any.
Materials and Methods
The present study was conducted on a groUp of patients (age range 12-50 years), some of whom had gallbladder disease with stones (n=50) and others (controls) who were admitted for other reasons as given in the table below:
The study was approvedby the Ethical Committee of the S.V.B.P. Hospital, L.L.R.M. Medical College, Meerut. At the time of the investigation, none of the patients were on any medicine or bad any history of diabetes mellitus and hepatic disease or any other disease which may influence lipids metabolism.
In all cases, blood samples were collected by veini puncture, after an overnight fast. Serum was separated by centrifugation and was stored in refrigerator at 4 degree centigrade until analysed.
Collection of Bile
Bile was collectedfromgallbladderby needle aspiration on the operation table at the time of operation. The gallbladder was emptied by needle aspiration so as to exclude unrepresentative sampling due to stratification of bile. In all cases except controls, aspiration was followed by Cholecystectomy.
Analysis of serum and biliary lipids
The lipoproteins were determined by ultracentrifugation and precipitation as described by Wilson and Spige?. Total cholesterol estimation was done by the method described by Zak et al4 and triglycerides were estimated by that of Van Handel and Zilversmit5.
Statistical calculations of data were done using the students t- test for unpaired samples.
Serum and biliary LDLc, TC and TG levels in patients with gallstones showed significant elevation (P<0.00l) when compared to control (Table I).
Serum and biliary HDLc were significantly low (P<0.001) in the patients with gallstones.
VLDLc in serum and bile was not significant (P>0.05). It is apparent from Table II,
that peitentage of gallstone patients with abnormal lipoprotein content was much higher than that of patients with normal lipoprotein contents. In contrast, serum cholesterol which was found to be diagnostic only in 59.43% of the cases, the percentage incidence of abnormal HDLc and LDLC level was as high as 67.42% and 70.28% respectively. The correlation coefficients of serum and biliaiy LDLc and HDLc indicate that there exists a good correlation between HDLc and LDLc (r=+.67 and r=+.56).
The importance of increased serum concentration of cholesterol and triglyceride (TG) with Cholelithiasis has been stressed in various publications6-8. The present data revealed a positive correlation of serum cholesterol and TO levels with the incidence of gallstone. A 59.4% hypercholesterolemia and 57.1% hypertrigly ceridaemia was observed in this study (Table II): Though, serum cholesterol and serum triglyceride may be contributing towards the genesis of cholelithiasis, a few contradictions9-10. report that a considerable percentage of patients have gallstones without these factors. As demonstrated in Fra.mingham11 subjects, the possibility of shared factors as the basis of the cholesterol related gallstone disease and coronaiy heart disease association, it is clear that these two diseases have in common a variety of risk factors -most notably, age, obesity, blood lipids and diet6-12. Therefore, measure of specific lipoprotein blood fractions seem to be more meaningful than total serum cholesterol values as intervening variable in the gallstone disease and its lithogenic index.
The present study indicated increased low density lipoprotein (LDLc) levels in gallstone patients as to controls which, suggests, that as LDLc in serum increases, thensk for the development of stones in gallbladder increases. The fmdings presented herein also reported low (abnonnal) levels of high density lipoproteins (HDLc) in the patients of gall stones as compared to controls. This illustrates that patients having decreased serum HDLc levels are more susceptible to develop cholelithiasis. Reduced concentrations of HDLc with gall bladder stones has been reported by other workers13,14. Similarly, Chen et al, also showed significantly decreased HDL1- Ch and HDL2-Ch values of serum in all his experimental groups of cholelithiasis compared with control group15. He found the disorder of lipoprotein metabolism in the formation of low levels of bile acids as compared with controls.
To be more illustrative and informative about the importance of parameters, serum HDLc and serum LDLc at a criterion level in cholelithiasis, patients were divided into two groups; Group A: Comprising of patients with nonnal serum HDLc (above 50 mg/dl), serum LDLc (below 130 mg/dl), serum cholesterol (below 250 mg/dl) and serum TO (below 150 mg/dl) and Group B: Patients with abnormal serum HDLc levels (above 130 mg/dl), serum TC (above 250 mg/dl) and serum TG (above 150 mg/dl) as shown in Table II. The percentage of patients with abnormal serum LDLc levels and serum HDLc levels was found to be 70.2% and 67.4% whereas, serum cholesterol and serum TO were abnonnal in only about half of the cases. Our results reflected greater degree of percent increase in abnormal serum levels of HDLc and LDLc than cholesterol and triglyceride. Thus, it can be said that patients with decreased serum HDLc and increased serum LDLc levels have greater risk for the development of cholelithiasis by producing supersaturated bile with cholesterol. It is hypothesized that this changed pattern of unfavourable specific lipoprotein profile in the serum and bile of these patients may be a good predictive index for the presence of cholesterol-related gallstones. This fact was further strengthened by the findings of Breyfogle and others who correlated gallstone with MI, diabetes and atherosclerosis11,16,17. and assessed the importance of lipid metabolism in the pathogenesis of cholelithiasis.
HDLc probably delivers cholesterol to the liver for excretion17, it can be reasonably expected that a high concentration of HDLc may overwhelm the ability of liver to excrete cholesterol, shunting more cholesterol away frombile acid pathway and producing bile that is more lithogenic. Hyperlipidaemia is strongly associated with cholelithiasis. Accordingto Ahlbeig18 and Einarson19, GS is associatedwith hyperlipoproternaemia type IV18,19. In our study evidence of familial factors in GS are very few but 62%of the patients were of cholesterol type and had definite evidence of hyperlipidaemia in one of their parents or children which further strengthens the validity of higher frequency of gallstone found in family members and are likely to be due to genetic factors. Familial hyperchoiesterolaernia related to cholesterol gallstones has been reported by Lindenet al20. It is concluded that familial hyperlipidaemiais the causative factor in the development of cholelithiasis where assessment of specific lipoprotein profile may play an important role in the diagnosis of the patients of cholelithiasis.
Authors are grateful to Dr. Dixit of Physiology Department MIMER Medical College, Thlegaon Dabhade, Pune, for his constructive suggestions.
1. Schwartz, CC., Halloran,L.G., Valchcevic,Z.R. eta!. Preferential utilization of free cholesterol from HDL for biliary cholesterol secretion in man. Science, 1978;200:62-64.
2. Janowitz, P. and WechsLcr, JO. The relationship between serum lipids, nucleation time and biliary lipids in patients with gallstones. Clin. Invest, 1992;5:430-436.
3, Wilson, D.E. and Spiger, MJ. A dual precipitation method for quantitative plasma lipoproteinmeasurementwithoutultracentrifugation. 3. Lab. Chit Med., 1973;82:473-482.
4. Zak, B., Dickenman, R.C., White, E.G. eta!. Rapid estimation of free and tots! cholesterol. Am. 3. Clin. Pathol., 1954,24:1307- 1315.
5. Van-Handel, E. and Zilveramit, DB. Micromethod for the direct determination ofserunitriglycerides. 3. Lab. CIin.Med., 1957,50:152-157.
6. La-Morte, WE., O’Leary, D.P., Booker, ML. et al. Increased dietary fatcontent accelerates cholesterol gallstone formation in the cholesterol fed prairie dog. Hepato!ogy, 1993;6:1498-503.
7. Rubin,M.Z. and Lichtenberg,D. Effect of lipid infusion on bile composition and lithogenicity in patients without cholesterol gallstones. Gut, 1992;33:1400-1403.
8. Tandon,R.K., Srivastava,A.K.,Bhaskar, AK. eta!. Lithogenicity of bile in lndian patients with cholesterol gallstones. Indian 3. Med. Res., 1980;6:907-91 3.
9. Friedman,G.D., Kannel,W.B. and Dawber, T.R. The epidemiology of gallbladder disease: Observations in the Framingham study. 3. Chronic Dis., 1966,19:273-274.
10, Friedman, G.D. The relationship between coronary heart disease and gallbladder disease. Ann. Intern. Med., 1968;68:222-23.
11. Bortnichak, E.A., Freeman, D.H., Ostfeld, AM. eta!. The association between cholesterol cholelithiasis andcoronaty heartdisease in Framingham, Massachusetts. Am. 3. Epidemiol., 1985;121 :19-30.
12. Hayesk, K.C. and Liverstone, A. Dietary impact on biliary lipids and gallstones. Annu. Rev. Nutr., 1992;12:299-326.
13. Petitti, D.B., Friedman, GD. and Klatsky, AL. Association of a history of gallbladder disease with a reduced concentration of high density !ipoprotein choiesterol.N. EngI. J. Med., 1981;304:1396-1398.
14. Thornton, JR., Heaton,K.W. and Mac Farlane, D.G.R. A relation between high density lipoprotein cholesterol and bile cholesterol saturation. Br. Med. J., 1981;283:1352-4.
15. Chen, N., Fu, L. and Xion. L. Changes in serum lipoprotein cholesterol in rabbit model of a Ca bilirubinate cholangio!ithiasis. Hua. Hsi. I. Ko. Ta. Hsueh. Hsuch. Pao., 1994,3:301-304.
16. Breyfogle, H.S. The frequency of co-existing gallbladder and coronary artery disease: A statistical analysis and biometeric evaluation of 1,493 necropsies. JAMA, 1940;114:1434.
17. Miller, G J. and Miller, N.E. Plasma-high-density lipoprotein concentration and development ofischaemic heart disease. Lancet, 1975;1: 16-17,
18. Alberg, 3. Serum lipids levels and hyperlipoproteinaemia in gallstone patients. Acts. Chir. Scand., 1979;145:373-74.
19. Einarsson, K.,Hellstrom, K. and Kallner, M. Gallbladder disease in hyperlipo. proteinaemia. Lancet, 1975;1 :434.
20. Linder Hoogerbrugge-Vd. N., De.Rooy, F.W., Jansen, N. et al. Effect of pravastatin on biliary lipid composition and bile acid synthesis in familial hyper cholestcro!aemia. Gut, 1990;31:348- 350.