Syed Faiz-ul-Hassan Rizvi ( Department of Cardiology, Sheikh Zayed Medical College/Hospital, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan. )
Saeed-ur-Rehman Bajwa ( Department of Cardiology, Sheikh Zayed Medical College/Hospital, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan. )
Ghulam Mustafa ( Department of Community Medicine, Sheikh Zayed Medical College/Hospital, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan. )
Daniyeh Khurram ( Private Patient Block, Sheikh Zayed Medical College/Hospital, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan. )
Ahsan Niaz ( Department of Cardiology, Sheikh Zayed Medical College/Hospital, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan. )
Shakeel Akhtar ( Department of Cardiology, Sheikh Zayed Medical College/Hospital, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan. )
Aamir Javaid ( Department of Cardiology, Sheikh Zayed Medical College/Hospital, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan. )
Shahid Mahmood ( Department of Cardiology, Sheikh Zayed Medical College/Hospital, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan. )
Hina Masood ( Department of Cardiology, Sheikh Zayed Medical College/Hospital, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan. )
Komal Asghar ( Department of Cardiology, Sheikh Zayed Medical College/Hospital, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan. )
Reperfusion therapy in ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) is the major therapeutic goal.1 Rapid initiation of reperfusion therapy for STEMI is achieved with either fibrinolytic therapy or primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI).2,3 In a country like Pakistan, where primary PCI is virtually not available to vast majority of our population, fibrinolysis remains the mainstay of reperfusion strategy. Fibrinolytic therapy instituted during the first hour has remarkable outcome4,5 and even within 3 hours after symptom onset, can result in mortality reduction of up to 50%.2,3
In Pakistan, having few cardiac centres catering to major cities offering limited number of primary PCI, the majority of STEMI patients from rural and urban population are treated in emergency departments and coronary care unit (CCU) of general hospitals wherein timely delivery of thrombolytic treatment is hampered due to a number of reasons. Lack of awareness of symptom recognition by patients and their relatives, accurate appraisal by general practitioners (GPs), distance to facility and mode of transportation6 are among the most important factors leading to delay in presentation, thus prolonging total time (TT) to treatment, and resulting in worse outcome in a large number of the patients. The Punjab government has established emergency medical services (EMS) Rescue 1122 in all the major districts of the province.7 This is the first trained Emergency Rescue Medical Service established in Pakistan according to international training standards. The service is providing efficient and effective rescue and transportation to the helpless victims of accidents, emergencies and disasters.8
Furthermore, emergency departments (EDs) of general care hospitals in Pakistan, like most of the developing countries, are not providing prompt fibrinolysis and, hence, door-to-needle time (DNT) is higher than recommended.10 The first chest pain unit (CPU) was developed in 1981,10 to evaluate patients with chest pain and it has been shown that CPU care can reduce admissions, re-attendances and outpatient followup, and improve the quality of life for selected low-risk patients who are suitable for CPU care. However, CPUs are rarely used for thrombolytic treatment.11
The objective of the current study was to develop a protocol for speedy delivery of thrombolytic treatment in a general hospital within limited resources in order to achieve the recommended timing goal by international guidelines.12 To achieve this goal we planned to utilise EMS services to cut short TT; established CPU to reduce DNT; and observed the outcome of these two interventions in STEMI patients.
A total of 291 patients with STEMI fulfilled the criteria for thrombolytic treatment. Only 15 (5.15%) patients were brought by Rescue 1122, while the rest of the patients presented on their own or were referred by GP/cardiologist. The age ranged between 22-90 years with a mean of 51±11.5 years. Males were 245 (84%); 106 (43%) were illiterate; and 136 (55.3%) belonged to urban areas. Only 2 (1%) were graduates and above. Regarding TT, there was statistically significant difference by mode of presentation. The minimum TT was in Rescue 1122 patients, and the minimum DNT was among the referred patients (Table-1).
TT was reduced by 3:05hr in patients brought by Rescue 1122. Thirty (10.30%) patients were thrombolysed at CPU, 216 (74.22%) in CCU and 45 (15.46%) at ED. Total Time was 3:52 hour (CPU), 5:29 hour (CCU), 4:55hour (ED) (P = 0.003). Low level of education, rural residence and female gender had a negative effect on TT. Patients with TT <3hr had significant effect on ST segment resolution (STR) and complications.
The average DNT was 28 minutes in CPU, 1.17 hour (CCU), 1.26 hour (ED). The DNT was significantly dropped in CPU compared to ED and CCU (P = <0.0001), reaching the recommended time of <30 minutes (Table-2).
There was reduction of 63 minutes in DNT at CPU versus CCU. The STR greater than 70% was maximum in CPU compared to ED and CCU (P = <0.0001). The STR and complications were significantly reduced by venue of thrombolysis (Figure-1).
All consecutive STEMI patients presenting to the ED of Sheikh Zayed Hospital, Rahimyar Khan from January to October 2009 were included in the study. There were two phases of the study: in the first phase, EMS of Rescue 1122 were utilised to reduce TT by removing transportation delay and ensuring speedy communication between cardiology services and Rescue 1122 ambulance staff. Injection Streptokinase (SK) was instituted either in the general emergency department or CCU.
In the second phase, a CPU was established within the existing ED in a separate room fully equipped with monitoring system and resuscitation trolley, in addition to rescue 1122 services, to reduce DNT. A trained medical officer from the cardiology department and a cardiac nurse were deputed. All patients with STEMI were thrombolysed in CPU and shifted to the CCU after stabilisation.
TT was defined as time from the onset of symptoms to the start of treatment, and the DNT as the time from arrival at the facility to the start of the treatment. A proforma describing patients\\\' characteristics, demographics, TT, DNT, reperfusion criteria, immediate and delayed complications were filled in by the attending doctor. The data was entered and analysis was done using SPSS 16.0. Comparative groups were analysed using Chi-Square and Kruskal-Wallis tests and p <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
The patients who were brought in by EMS had a marked reduction in TT, which was reduced to almost half of the other modes of presentation. Since there wasn\\\'t a major difference in DNT, decrease in TT portrayed a lower transportation time than other modes. This can be attributed to the fact that Rescue 1122 is an ever available emergency facility which ensures quick response to emergency calls and speedy delivery to hospitals.88 Both these advantages are not present when patients rely on home transportation alone. In developed countries, emergency services are equipped with the devices that transmit patient information, and even electrocardiographs, to the nearest hospital.12 Hence, valuable time is not wasted in petty formalities, triage and initial assessments. Pre requisite arrangements can be made by the hospital and the patient can get immediate treatment. Pre-hospital administration of thrombolytics has even been well advocated in EMS13,14 with favourable results. Low level of education, distance, lack of awareness regarding recognition of symptoms of MI are among the many factors which affect delayed presentation, hence increasing TT.15-17 In our study, the female gender, lack of education and rural residence had significant impact on prolonging TT.
The other important segment of our study is the establishment of CPUs in the ED of non-cardiac general hospitals. CPUs were first developed in the US with the intention to improve diagnostic accuracy, shorten hospital stay and save money.18 In UK a significant number of hospitals are running CPUs.19 However, the concept of CPU is still a novel idea in our country. In our study, the utilisation of CPU reduced the DNT to 28 minutes, hence affecting TT as a whole. This is the one factor that played the most significant role and achieved the goal of 30-minute DNT laid down by global guidelines. The time taken to transfer the patient to the CCU for thrombolysis may result in delayed treatment20 and a patient with chest pain may not receive the required attention in the overcrowded ED with other equally serious patients fighting for the attention of limited number of doctors and staffs attention. In this situation, a CPU may be the most appropriate place, especially since increased DNT has been directly linked with increased mortality.21 We introduced the concept of utilizing CPUs as a venue for thrombolysis, wherein previously the major role of CPUs had mainly been in assessment and monitoring of chest pain patients.
Patients with TT <3 hours also had a significant effect on STR and reduction in complications and a DNT <30min had a more favourable result. Hence, concerning mode of presentation and venue of treatment, it is understandable that presentation via Rescue 1122 and treatment in CPU had the most positive and encouraging results.
By combining Rescue 1122 and CPU, a total of 4hour and 8minutes were reduced in our study, having a remarkable improvement in managing STEMI patients. Therefore, we want to emphasise on two important aspects in the management of STEMI patients. First, is the use of EMS, and the second is the establishment of CPU within the existing emergency setup. Our Rescue 1122 services may not be as advanced yet as those of the developed countries. We suggest that our rescue teams be trained in symptom recognition, performing and interpretation of ECGs. A system should be created for prior warning to hospitals and ECG sent to CPU by telemetry. Furthermore, general awareness should be created in the public regarding the benefit of using Rescue 1122 over other modes of transportation. Secondly, our study proves the drastic improvement in timely delivery of thrombolytics with the use of CPU. It is the only situation in which global guidelines of DNT <30 minutes could be accomplished. This is a major achievement for us. Incorporation of CPUs in at least the major hospitals across the country may prevent a great deal of morbidity and mortality. We propose that in every ED, one room be allocated for this purpose, which should be fully equipped and staffed with trained personnel. It is not an insurmountable task, but it is an undertaking that can have a beneficial effect on the management of STEMI nationwide. We included all the 291 consecutive patients with STEMI presenting to the hospital within a certain period of time. However, the sample size was not estimated earlier, and this is a limitation of our study.
To continue, in the third phase we plan to intervene at the community level by creating awareness regarding recognition of chest pain symptoms in population at large, train GPs and rescue personnel for proper diagnosis of STEMI, pre-hospital ECG by Rescue personnel and their ability to read and interpret limited ECG tracings and ensure fast communication between CPU and Rescue 1122, in order to get prompt thrombolytic treatment.
Based on the findings of our study, we propose a model for the speedy delivery of thrombolytic treatment in Pakistan. Emergency medical services should be contacted at the onset of chest pain and the patients sent directly to CPU for evaluation (Figure-2).
Integrating these two not-so-difficult strategies, a great deal of time may be saved, and when fighting a battle where \\\'time is muscle,\\\' \\\'time\\\' could mean the difference between life and death.
By utilizing EMS, remarkable improvement in the timing of fibrinolytic treatment was noticed. It is strongly recommended that CPUs be developed in EDs of all districts and tertiary care hospitals nationwide as a cost-effective facility with a great impact on morbidity and mortality related to STEMI. Besides, awareness must be created among population at large regarding the recognition of chest pain symptoms, and the benefits of utilising EMS.
1. Gharacholou SM, Alexander KP, Chen AY, Wang TY, Melloni C, Gibler WB, et al. Implications and reasons for the lack of use of reperfusion therapy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: findings from the CRUSADE initiative. Am Heart J 2010; 159: 757-63.
2. Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Hand MM, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction). (Online) (Cited 2007 June 27). Available from URL: http://www.acc.org/qualityandscience/clinical/guidelines/ stemi/Guideline1/ index.htm.
3. Boerema E, Maas AC, Deckers JW, Simoons ML. Early thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: reappraisal of golden hour. Lancet 1996; 348: 771-5.
4. No author listed. An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. The GUSTO investigators. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 673-82.
5. Holmes DR Jr, Califf RM, Topol EJ. Lessons we have learned from the GUSTO trial. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25: 10S-7S.
6. Malhotra S, Gupta M, Chandra KK, Grover A, Pandhi P. Prehospital delay in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction in the emergency unit of a North Indian tertiary care hospital. Indian Heart J 2003; 55: 349-53.
7. Punjab Emergency Services [home page on the Internet]. Rescue 1122, 2006. (Online) Updated August 2010. (Cited 2011 May). Available from URL: http://www.rescue.gov.pk/.
8. The News. 29,156 victims rescued last month. (Online) Updated 2011 May 9. (Cited 2011 May). Available from URL: http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=45862& Cat=6&dt=5/9/2011).
9. Pope JH, Aufderheide TP, Ruthazer R, Woolard RH, Feldman JA, Beshansky JR, et al. Missed diagnosis of acute cardiac ischaemia in the emergency department. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1163-70.
10. Hoekstra JW, Gibler WB. Chest pain evaluation units - an idea whose time has come. JAMA 1997; 278: 1701-2.
11. Goodacre S, Nichol J, Dixon S, Cross E, Angelini K, Axnold J, et al. Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a chest pain observation unit compared with routine care. BMJ 2004; 328: 254-7.
12. Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, Bates ER,Green LA, Hand M, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction - executive summary: a report of the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines on the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction). Circulation 2004; 110: 588-636.
13. Samantha L. Does EMS Activation of Heart Catheterization Labs Have an Impact on D2B Times? (Online) (Cited 2010 Feb 24) Available from URL: http://www.emsresponder.com/web/online/Education/Does-EMS-Activation-of-Heart-Catheterization-Labs-Have-an-Impact-on-D2B-Times/5$12230.
14. Steg PG, Bonnefoy E, Chaubaud S, Lapostolle F, Dubien Y, Cristofini P, et al. Impact of time to treatment on morbidity after prehospital fibrinolysis or primary angioplasty: data from the CAP TIM randomized clinical trial. Circulation 2003; 108: 2851-6.
15. Goldberg RJ, Gurwitz JH, Gore JM. Duration of, and temporal trends (1994-1997) in, prehospital delay in patients with acute myocardial infarction: the second National Registry of Myocardial Infarction. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159: 2141-7.
16. Khan MS, Jafary FH, Faruqui AM, Rasool SI, Hatcher J, Chaturvedi N, et al. High prevalence of lack of knowledge of symptoms of acute myocardial infarction in Pakistan and its contribution to delayed presentation to the hospital. BMC Public Health 2007; 7: 284.
17. McGinn AP, Rosamond WD, Goff DC Jr, Taylor HA, Miles JS, Chambless L. Trends in prehospital delay time and use of emergency medical services for acute myocardial infarction: experience in 4 US communities from 1987-2000. Am Heart J 2005; 150: 392-400.
18. Storrow AB, Gibller WB. Chest pain centres; diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome. Ann Emerg Med 2000; 35: 449-61.
19. Goodacre SW. Should we establish chest pain units within UK. A systematic review and critical appraisal of literature. J Accid Emerg Med 2000; 17: 1-6.
20. Masurkar VA, Kapadia FN, Shirwadkar CG, Shukla U, Sood P. Evaluation of the door-to-needle time for fibrinolytic administration for acute myocardial infarction: Indian J Critical Care Med 2005; 9: 137-40.
21. McNamara RL, Herrin J, Wang Y, Curtis JP, Bradley EH, Magid DJ, et al. Impact of delay in door-to-needle time on mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Am J Cardiol 2007; 100: 1227-32.