Abdul Jamil Choudhry ( Department of Community Medicine, Allama lqbal Medical College. )
Mahmuda Mubasher ( Institute of Public Health, Lahore. )
Two hundred sixty4wo randomly sampled general physicians of Lahore were interviewed to study the current practices and factors affecting the management of acute watery diarrhoea (AWD) in children below 5 years of age. Among the physicians, 19% prescribed ORS alone, 61% ORS with some drug, 15% drugs alone and 5% increased fluid intake only. Physicians in govemment sector, recent graduates and those trained in a paediatrics unit prescribed more on the wHO guidelines (p<0.05). Attending a diarrhoea training unit (OTU) course, reading WHO guidelines for management of diarrhoea and total number of patients seen daily had no significant effect on prescribing practices. Two hundred fifty-five (97%) physicians thought that majority of other physicians prescribed drugs for the management of acute watery diarrhoea to satisfy the mothers of the children, their belief in the effectiveness of drugs and competition in practice (JPMA 47:32, 1997).
In Pakistan, there are estimated 54 millions episodes of diarrhoea yearly, causing some 300,000 deaths of children below 5 years of age1 . Management of diarrhoea was previously based on intravenous (IV) fluids, initial bowel rest, gradual reintroduction of foods and use of antibiotics and antidiarrhoeal dregs. Mortality and morbidity associated with diarrhoea cases can be effectively reduced by oral rehydration solution (ORSL continued feeding. avoidance of dregs for acute watery diarrhoea (AWD) and effective instmction of the child’s mother or other caretaker in management and danger signs2.
It can be difficult to incorporate new information and to modify the physician’s choice of therapy3-6. The main sources of information on drugs for doctors are either physicians or advertisements by pharmaceutical companies. Thus ORT has to compete with the multimillion-dollar propaganda campaign of pharmaceutical companies forhigh-cost drugs. A numberof studies in developing countries describe the current management of diarrhoea in children and the effect of different strategies used to change their practice. The use of ORS has increased without affecting the use of antibiotics and antidiarrhoeal drugs7-9. Special guidelines for the management of diarrhoea were prepared in 1988 and disseminated to physicians for information and implementation in Pakistan1. Since March 1989, a special one week training course for management of diarrhoea has been offered on a regular basis by the Government of Pakistan in diarrhoea training units (DTUs). During 1989-1991, approximately 10,000 physicians, mainly from the government sector, participated in this training. General physicians in the private sector have not been extensively trained through this mechanism although they might have participated in a workshop on diarrhoea management or obtained information from DTU-trnined physicians or throughjournals and newsletters. This study was conducted to determine physicians reported practices in childhood diarrhoea and to identify factors affecting this behaviour.
Study area and study Population
A list of all private general physicians and medical officers/house physicians of Lahore who treat children but are not qualified paediatricians was prepared. Lists of medical officers in government sector and house physicians were compiled with the help of Provincial and Municipal Health Departments of house physicians and Heads of departments of pacdiatrics in teaching hospitals respectively. For private sector listing help was provided by Wellcome Pharmaceuticals and Pakistan Medical Association. Lahore branch. Thus a total of 1257 physicians were listed in the private (1067) and Government (190) sectors.
Epi Info 5 was used to calculate the sample size. In the absence of comparable data expected frequency was presumed to be 50%, to give the highest sample size required. To detect a 5% difference at a confidence interval of 95%, sample size was estimated to be 220. To give an approximate 20% margin for non-response. a total of 262 physicians (223 private and 39 government) were drawn from the list with the help of a random number table.
All 262 physicians included in the study were interviewed at their place of work by a team of three physicians using a pretested, semi-structured questionnaire, The interviewing physicians were trained by the principal investigator.
Physicians were asked whether they would prescribe ORS and/or drugs for a child under 5 years with acute watery diarrhoea (AWD) without dehydration and no histoty of blood or mucous in stool.
The physician factors recorded included internal predictors such as year of medical graduation, experience in child care, training at a diarrhoea training unit (DTU) or other workshop, reading WHO guidelines on management of diarrhoea and external predictors such as place of work, perceived satisfaction of mothers with prescription of drugs or with ORS alone, children’s response to ORS and number of patients seen daily.
The results were analyzed to study the relationship between the factors studied and the current reported practices of the physicians regarding the prescription of ORS and drugs.
Statistical significance was tested by chi-square without continuity correction. Forthe purpose of reporting p<0.05 was used a cut off point for statistical significance.
The prescription of ORS for the management of AWD has increased in developing countries but the use of drugs still remains high3,4. In this study, only 19% physicians prescribed ORS alone but the majority (80%) used drugs with ORS.
Physicians who graduated recently and those who worked in - paediatric units were exposed to the new concepts of management of AWD, therefore, they prescribed more on WHO guidelines. A short one-week special training course at the DTU and reading WHO guidelines did not have a significant impact on the reported practices of physicians. This suggests that medical school and postgraduate training in paediatrics are the cntical determinants of prescribing practices.
Physicians in the government sector prescribe more in accordance with the WHO recommendations than those in the private sector. This has also been reported from Indonesia, suggesting that physicians in government sector are affected less by their perception of mother’s expectations about prescribing drugs for AWD8. This may be because, their income is not directly affected by the number of patients seen.This practice is further reinforced by their belief that the majority of mothers can be satisfied with ORS alone. Perception of ehildrens preference had no effect on reported use of ORS. This suggests that education of mothers about the value of ORS alone for AWD can influence physicians practice. Two other issues appear to adversely affect reported practice, first is the belief in the efficacy of drugs and the second that other physicians give drugs and that it is necessaty to do for the “competition”. These represent another target concept for education prOgrammes. The failure of DTU training to influence reported practice suggest that the second may be a more “potent” message.
It is concluded that although the information to use ORS and no drugs in the management of AWD in children has reached the majority of physicians, but it has no effect on reported practice as expected. The answer of the problem therefore, lies in well planned teaching and training programmes for the profession and the community and the organization of private practice in such a way, through the insurance system, that physicians are not directly dependent on the will of patients for their income.
We would like to thank Dr. Humaira Mubasher, Dr. Sahibzada Azhar Mujib and Dr. Tajammal Hussain Mir for their help in conducting the study. We would also like to acknowledge the help provided by ADDR staff including Dr. Richard Cash, Dr. Jim Trostle, Dr. Karen Peterson and Dr. Fitzroy Henzy. We specially acknowledge the support and help provided by Mr. Jonathon Simon throughout the study, without which this study would not have materialized. We also want to acknowledge the support provided by the Principal and administrative staff of Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore.
Financial support for this research was provided in part by Harvard University by means of a co-operative agreement with the U.S. Agency for International Development.
1. Lambert, 3. Child mortality and morbidity in Pakistan with specific emphasis on diarrhoeal disease. In: Water assessment, Vol. 1, tslamabad, UNICEF, 1986, pp.22-27.
2. PRITECH/WHO Mcdical education project. Readings on diarrhoca. Geneva, WHO, 1986.
3. Wallsten, I S. Physician and medical student bias in evaluating diagnostic information. Med. Decia. Making, 1981; 1:145-64.
4. Dubeau, CE., Voytovich, A E. and Rippey, R. M Premature concluaiona in the diagnosis of iron-deficiency anaemia. Mcd. Decis. Making, 1986;6: 169-73.
5. Friedlander, M.L, and Stockman, S.J. Anchoring and puhlicity .effects in clinical judgement. J. Clin. Psycho!., 1983;39:637-43.
6. McNeil,B.J., Panker, S.C., Sox,H.C. etal. On the elicitation ofpreferencea for alternative therapies. N. EngI. 5. Med., 1982;306:1259-62.
7. Aquilla. RD. Physician’s practices related to the treatment of childhood diarrhoea in two areas of Peru, with special emphasis on nutritional aspects of therapy. ADDR Annual Report 1990, pp. 5 8-59.
8. Cam, L. Physicians prescribing practice for treatment of acutewatety diarrhoea inyoung children in Jakarta, J. Diarrhoea! Dis Res., 1991;9:194-199.
9. Ngandu, N.H. and Nkowsne, EM. The management of diarrhoea in young children in a rural community in zambia. 5. Trop. Med. Hyg.. 1988;91:199-201.