By Author
  By Title
  By Keywords

September 1999, Volume 49, Issue 9

Original Article

Pakistan National Diabetes Survey Prevalence of Glucose Intolerance and Associated Factors in North West Frontier Province (NVVFP) of Pakistan

A.S. Shera  ( Diabetic Association of Pakistan and WHO Collaborating Centre for Diabetes, Karachi. )
G. Rafique  ( Diabetic Association of Pakistan and WHO Collaborating Centre for Diabetes, Karachi. )
K.I. Ahmed  ( Diabetic Association of Pakistan and WHO Collaborating Centre for Diabetes, Karachi. )
S. Baqai  ( Diabetic Association of Pakistan and WHO Collaborating Centre for Diabetes, Karachi. )
I.A. Khan  ( Department of Community Medicine, GIMS, Peshawar. )
H. King  ( Division of Non-Communicable Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. )

Abstract

Aim: To estimate the prevalence of non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and their relationship with age and obesity in a population based survey in the rural areas of NWFP, Pakistan.
Setting: Three villages, Pawakai, Reghi and Jhagra in NWFP were the target areas.
Methods: Cluster sampling of 1035 adults aged 25 years and above (207 men, 828 women) was done. Oral glucose tolerance tests were performed and the diagnosis of diabetes and IGT was made according to WHO criteria. Height, weight and waist hip ratio of the study population were recorded. The Chi Square test was used to measure the association among the different variables. Basic demographic information from the subjects was collected by a physician using a standard questionnaire.
Results: The overall prevalence of NIDDM and IGT in both sexes was 11.1 % and 9.4%. The sex specific prevalence of diabetes was 9.2% in men and 11.6% in women. Advanced age, positive family history of diabetes and obesity were associated with higher rates of diabetes. In both sexes high Waist Hip Ratio (WHR) was more closely associated with diabetes than was high Body Mass Index (BMI).
Conclusion: The prevalence of diabetes mellitus in rural areas of NWFP is high and almost similar to that of Sindh and Baluchistan OPMA 49:206, ‘1999).

Introduction

The prevalence of non-insulin dependent diabetes (NIDDM) is increasing worldwide1. Studies on migrant South Asian Indian populations have reported a higher prevalence of NIDDM in comparison to the indigenous population of the Indian subcontinent or the natives of the host country2-7. A number of studies done on the indigenous population in the Indian subcontinent8,9 are, however, not comparable as very few studies used the standardized WHO criteria for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus10. Nevertheless, the indigenous population of Pakistan appears to have high prevalence rate of diabetes as reported in our earlier surveys conducted in the province of Sindh11 (overall NIDDM 13.9%) and Baluchistan12 (overall NIDDM 8.6%) which is comparable to the immigrant Asian population elsewher13,14. Earlier studies have shown that BMI and WHR are independent risk factors for NIDDM and IGT15-19 and the relationship between obesity, hypertension and glucose intolerance is also well documented20,21.
This is the report of the third phase of the nationwide prevalence survey of diabetes that was conducted in the rural areas of Peshawar, NWFP Province.

Subjects and Methods

Study population
The survey was carried out on 1035 adults aged 25 years and above (207 men, 828 women) in three geographically defined villages, Pawakai, Reghi and Jhagra situated near Peshawar, the capital of NWFP Province. Cluster sampling was done in the three villages.
One month before the survey, a team of survey officers and local volunteers noted the names of those aged 25 years and above for each household included in the study. They also provided them with detailed infonnation and printed leaflets emphasizing the significance of the study and encouraged them to participate in it.
Screening Procedure and Blood Sampling
All subjects were asked to attend the survey site on a specified day after an overnight fast of 10-14 hours. After registration, a fasting blood sample was drawn and each individual, excluding previously diagnosed diabetics, was given 82.5g of glucose monohydrate (equivalent to 75g anhydrous glucose) dissolved in 250 ml of water, which was consumed within a period of 5 minutes.
Height, weight and waist-hip ratio were recorded. Standing height and weight were measured with subjects in light clothing and no shoes. Height was taken to the nearest cm and weight to the nearest 0.1 kg. Waist circumference was measured to the nearest cm at the mid-point between the iliac crest and the lower margin of the ribs, with the subjects standing and breathing normally. Hip circumference was measured to the nearest cm at the level of the maximum circumference around the buttocks posteriorly, and at the symphysis pubis anteriorly.
Basic demographic information from the subjects was collected by a physician using a standard questionnaire. Family history of diabetes was regarded as positive if NIDDM was present in a first degree relative. Subjects not known to be diabetic remained at the examination centre until the second sample of blood glucose was taken, exactly 2 hours after commencing the glucose drink. Blood pressure was recorded by a physician with the bell of the stethoscope and the subject seated for atleast 10 min, in the right arm using an adult size cuff and standard mercury column sphygmomanometer. Two readings were taken in every subject. If the two readings differed by 10 mmHg or more, a third reading was recorded by another doctor and the mean of the two closest ones was taken as the final result. The subjects were lastly interviewed by a dietitian who filled up a proforma using 24 hours recall method.
Every day the non-responders for that particular day were contacted by the survey team and given a new appointment.
All blood samples were collected in fluoride tubes, centrifuged immediately and refrigerated. After the sample collection was completed for the day, the plasma was transferred to separate tubes and refrigerated at -20 degrees centigrade for analysis later on the same day. Plasma glucose was determined by the glucose oxidase method using a Hitachi 705 analyzer in a laboratory which takes its quality assurance through CAP (College of American Pathologists) survey programme.
Diagnostic criteria
The 1985 WHO diagnostic criteria for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and IGT were used to classify glucose tolerance status10.
The diagnostic values used were:
1. For diabetes mellitus, fasting venous plasma glucose >140    mg/dl or 2 hour venous plasma glucose >200 mg/dl.
2. For IGT, 2 hour venous plasma glucose 140-199 rng/dl.
3. Diabetes was considered to be already present if the diagnosis of diabetes had been made previously by a physician.
Statistical Methods
Data analysis was conducted with statistical package Epinfo 6.0. BMI was calculated as weight/height2 (kg/m2)
and the WHR as the waist girth in cm/hip girth in cm. Levels for BMI and WHR were defined separately for both sexes as follows: BMI for women: normal 20-25, high >25; BMI for men: normal 20-27, high >27; WHR for women: normal 0.75-0.85; high >0.85; WHR for men: normal 0.85-0.95, high >0.95. The Chi-square test was used to measure the association among the different variables. The results for continuous variables are given in the form of averages, standard deviations and their 95% confidence intervals. The significance between two group means was assessed by Z test. The relative risk was obtained by comparing BMI, WHR and positive family history of diabetes, in both sexes separately.

Results

A total of 1035 subjects were examined in the three villages. The age distribution of men and women is shown in Figure 1.

In the younger age groups (25-44 years) relatively more women attended (42%). A lower response rate seen in men in all three areas was due to inability to attend on working days.
Prevalence of abnormal glucose tolerance
The prevalence of previously diagnosed NIDDM was 3.4% in men and 4.2% in women. Newly diagnosed NIDDM was detected in 5.8% (men) and 7.4% (women). The mean age ±SD of the newly diagnosed diabetics for men was 55±12 and women 53±15 years. IGT was encountered in 9.7% men and 9.3% women.
Overall glucose intolerance, including previously and newly diagnosed NIDDM and IGT was detected in 20.4% of men and women in rural NWFP. Prevalence of glucose intolerance increased with advancing age in both sexes, reaching a peak in the 75+ years age group in both men and women. The age specific rates for IGT prevalence were higher in women at younger ages (25-44 years) and peaked in men at 65-74 years (Table 1).


Distribution of 2-hour blood glucose
The distribution of the 2-hour BG values in the subjects with exclusion of previously known diabetics is shown in Figure 2.

The mean±SD was 122±68.5 mg/dl for women and 114±72.4 mg/dl for men. The distribution, in both sexes was skewed to the right.
Factors associated with glucose tolerance
In all three villages abnormal glucose tolerance (IGT and diabetes) was more prevalent in older subjects in both sexes. Obesity and high waist-hip ratios were present in higher frequency in individuals with IGT and NIDDM than those with normal glucose tolerance. In both men and women high WHR was more closely associated with diabetes than high BMI.
The relative risk for development of diabetes in men with BMI >27 was 1.9 times whereas in men with WHR >0.95   this increased to 2.4 times compared to men with normal BMI and WHR. The relative risk of diabetes in women was twice with BMI >25 (p<0.001) and increased to four times with WHR >0.85 (p<0.001) compared to women with normal BMI and WHR. Men with high WHR were also 1.2 times (p<0.01) more likely to develop IGT. Although the difference in risk of developing IGT in women with high WHR was 1.3 times more, but this was not significant statistically.
A positive family history of diabetes (Table 2), was found more in subjects with NIDDM than in subjects with normal glucose tolerance both in men (27.5% vs 12.5%) and women (29.6% vs 15.3%). The relative risk of developing diabetes in subjects with a positive family history of diabetes increased four times in men (p<0.0l) and 1.76 times (p=0.01) in women. The relative risk of developing IGT in men and women with positive family history was 1.63 and 1.39 times more, respectively.
The prevalence of hypertension was associated with the glucose tolerance status (Table 2).

About 45% of women and 21% of men with diabetes and one-third of women and one-tenth of men with IGT also had hypertension as compared to less than 20% of women and less than 10% of men with normal glucose tolerance. In the study population hypertension was less prevalent in men as compared to women.

Discussion

This is the report of the third phase of Pakistan National Diabetes survey. The studies done on prevalence of diabetes in the migrant South Asian populations elsewhere have consistently shown a much higher prevalence of diabetes than the indigenous population of the Indian subcontinent and the native population of the host country2-7. In South Africa3, the overall prevalence of diabetes and IGT was 11. 1% and 6% respectively in Indians as compared to diabetes in Whites (3.6%) and Africans (4.1%). In Tanzania4, the overall prevalence of diabetes was 7.1% (4.4% known and 2.7% new) and IGT was 21.5% in the Muslim Indians. In Mauritius5, Indian Muslims had a prevalence rate of 13.3% for diabetes and 15.3% for IGT. Mather and Keen have documented a 3.8 times higher prevalence of known diabetes as compared to Europeans in Southall6. In the Coventry diabetes study, Simmons et al. noted diabetes in 11% of Asian men and 8% of Asian women as compared to 3% in white men and 4% in white women7. The overall prevalence rates of glucose intolerance (IGT and NIDDM) in this study was found to be 20.4% in both sexes which is comparable to our earlier studies done in the provinces of Sindh11 (25%) and Baluchistan12 (22%). However, as against our earlier surveys the prevalence of IGT are similar in both men and women. The finding of a higher prevalence of IGT in nien as compared to women in the older age group is also in variation with our previous studies where women at almost all ages have a higher prevalence of IGT11. The high rates of lOT in this population suggest the need of introducing health intervention measures that may be effective in primary prevention of diabetes in this area.
NIDDM in this study presented at a younger age, a finding also recognised in our earlier surveys11,12 as well as in previous studies on Asian migrants6,7,14. In consistence with other studies in migrant South Asian communities5-7 and the recently conducted studies in India22,23 the prevalence rates of NIDDM and IGT increased with age in both men and women. Prevalence of NIDDM in both men and women was highest in the age group 55-64 years. In women of urban area diabetes prevalence reached a peak (25.5%) in the age group 65-74 years.
A positive family history ‘of diabetes, obesity and abdominal fat distribution have been described as related risk factors in a number of studies11,16-19. In our study a positive family history was strongly related to NIDDM. Earlier studies have shown that BMI and WHR are independent risk factors for NIDDM and LOT and also demonstrated that WHR conveys a relatively stronger risk for NIDDM15,17,24. In our study the finding of a stronger association of WHR as compared to BMI with glucose intolerance Is consistent with above studies reporting that central obesity is a greater risk for developing diabetes as compared to peripheral obesity.
The relationship between hypertension and glucose intolerance is well documented20,21. In this study, as well as in our previous two surveys11,12 a marked association between glucose intolerance and hypertension was observed with indication of a gradient from normoglycaemia, through IGT, to diabetes.
As is evident from this and the earlier studies conducted in Shikarpur11 and Baluchistan12, adult diabetes has emerged as a major problem in Pakistan indicating the urgent need for planning preventive programmes for diabetes.

References

1. King H, Rewers M. Global estimates for prevalence of glucose intolerance. Diabetes Care. 1993;16:1-21.
2. Zimmet P, Taylor R, Ram P. et al. Prevalence of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance in the biracial (Malenesian and Indian) population of Fiji. A ntral­urban comparison. Am. J. Epidemiol., 1983;118:673-82.
3. Omar MAK, Seedat MA, Dyer RB, et al. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus in a large group of South African Indians. S. Afr., Medi., 1985;67:924-26.
4. Swai ABM, McLarty DG, Chuwa LM, et al. Diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance in an Asian community in Tanzania, Diabetes Res., Clin. Pract., 1990:8:227-34.
5. Dowse GK, Gareeboo H, Zimmet PZ, et al. High prevalence of NIDDM and impaired glucose tolerance in Indian, Creole and Chinese Mauritians. Diabetes. 1990:39:390-96.
6. Mather HM, Keen H. The Southall Diabetes Survey: Prevalence of diabetes in Asians and Europeans. Br. Med. J., 1985:291:1081-84.
7. Simmons D, Williams DRR. Powell MJ. Prevalence of diabetes in a predotninantly Asian community: preliminary findings of the Coventry diabetes study. Br. Med. J., 1989:298:16-21.
8. Gupta OP, Joshi MH, Dave SK. Prevalence of diabetes in India. In: M. Miller and PH Bennett (eds). Advances in metabolic disorders. New York, Academic Press, 1978, pp. 147-66.
9. Rarnaiya KL. Kodali WR, Alberli KGMM. Epidemiology of diabetes in Asians of the Indian Subcontinent. Diabetes Melab, Rev.. 1990:6:125-46.
10. World Health Organization: l)iabetes Mellitus: Report of a WHO study group. Geneva, WHO., (Tech. Rep. Ser. No. 727). 985.
11. Shera AS, Rafique G, Khawaja IA, ci al, Pakistan National Diabetes Survey: Prevalence of Glucose Intolerance and associated factors in Shikarpur. Sind. DiabeticMcd., 1995:12:1116-21.
12. Shera As, Rafiquc G, Khawaja IA, et al. Pakistan National Diabetes Survey: Prevalence of glucose intolerance and associated factors in Baluchistan province Diab. Res. Clin. Prac., 1999:44:49-58,
13. Samanta A, Burden AC, Fent B. Comparative prevalence of non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus in Asian and White Caucasian adults. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract., l987;4:1-6.
14. McKcigue PM, Shah B, Manuot MG. Relation of central obesity and insulin resistance with high diabetes prevalence and cardiovascular risk in South Asians, Laneet, 1991 ;337. 382-86.
15. Dowse GK. Zimmet PZ, Gareeboo H, et al. Abdominal obesity and physical inactivity as risk factors for NIDDM and impaired glucose tolerance in Indian, Creole and Chinese Mauritians. Diabetes Care, 1991:14:271-81.
16. Mykkanen L, Laakso M, Uusitupa M, et al. Prevalence of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance in elderly subjects and their association with obesity and family history of diabetes. Diabetes Care, 1990; 13-1099-1105.
17. MeKeigue PM, Peripoint T, Ferrie JE, et al. Relationship of glucose intolerance and hyperinsulinaemia to body fat pattern in South Asians and Europeans. Diabetologia, 1992:35:785-91.
18. Schmidt MI, Duncan BB, Canani LH, et al. Association of waist-hip ratio with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care, 1992; 15:912-14.
19. Wang SL, Pars WH, Hwu CM, et at. Incidence of NIDDM and the effects of gender, obesity and hyperinsulinaemia in Taiwan. Diabetologia, 1997;40:1431 -38.
20. ElMugamer IT, Ali Zayat AS, Hossain MM, et at, Diabetes, obesity and hypertension in urban and rural people of bedouin origin in the United Arab Emirates. J. Trop. Med., Hyg., 1995;98:407-15.
21. Gault A, O’Dea K, Rowley KG, et at. Abnormal glucose tolerance and other coronary heart disease risk factors in an isolated community in central Australia. Diabetes Care, 1996; 19:1269-73.
22. Verma NPS, Mehta SP, Madhu SV, et at. Prevalence of known diabetes in an urban Indian environment: The Darya Ganj Diabetes Survey. Br, Med. J., 1986;293:423-24.
23. Ramachandran A, Jali MV, Mohan V, et al. High prevalence of diabetes in an urban population in South india. Br. Med. J., 1988;297:587-90.
24. Shelgikar KM, Hockaday TD, Yajnik CS. Central rather than generatised obesity is related to hyperglycaemia in Asian Indian subjects. Diabetic Med., 1991;8:712-17.

Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees: