June 2000, Volume 50, Issue 6


Breast Cancer: Determination, Investigation and Control

Mohammad Shahid Siddiqui  ( Department of Pathology, Ziauddin Medical University, Karachi. )

Breast cancer research is going on at an unprecedented pace. A number of studies have been done throughout the world regarding breast cancer statistics1,2 Now it is a well-established fact that cancer of the breast is the most common malignant tumour and is a leading cause of death in females3. Its incidence is high in North America and Northern Europe, intermediate in Southern Europe and Latin America and low in most Asian and African countries4.
In Pakistan the epidemiology of breast cancer is not precisely explainable because of the lack of tumour registry system. However efforts have been made to explore the magnitude of the problem at a single or multi institutional basis. These studes5,6 have been done in different hospital settings of Northern and Southern Pakistan. This data is limited in information on the basis of geographical and time constraints. Nevertheless some information is available regarding the status of breast cancer statistics in our country. By utilizing, this information it is possible to investigate the natural history and to search for the environmental or genetic factors in the development of breast cancer.
By comparing the results of studies done in Pakistan with those of the western world6,7 differences have been found in the age of the patient, size of tumour. grading of tumours and lymph node status. The mean age with breast cancer is lower in studies from Pakistan as compared to the United States, which is probably due to the fact that overall, the Pakistani population is younger and their life expectancy is less than that of the United States7.
The epidemiological data has shown several risk factors associated with breast cancer 1. Indicators of endogenous hormonal alterations are among them: early age at menarche and late age at menopause, nulliparitv, late age at first full term pregnancy and obesity in postmenopausal women. Other established risk factors are family history of breast cancer. histologic characteristics of benign tissue, mammography patterns, exogenous hormones and alcohol consumption 8. In high risk families’ genetic predisposition has also been established and BRCA-1 gene has been identified as primarily responsible for early onset breast cancer 9.
In breast cancer patients long-term survival depends not only on the early detection but also on various prognostic markers. Early detection is done by means of screening programs, which include self-assessment, mammography and fine needle aspiration biopsy10. This program has been implemented as a national screening programme in the United Kingdom, the United States and also in other developed countries. Mammography has been widely used for the assessment of impalpable breast lesions as well as for extremely small tumours of 1 to 2 mm size11 This modality primarily relies on the presence of calcification for categorizing whether the lesion is benign or malignant. A recent study has classified breast carcinoma on the basis of the mammography finding12. According to this study, tumours of 10-14 mm size with casting type of calcification behaved aggressively as if they were larger lesions since the rate of death was similar to that of advanced high grade tumours. The long-terni survival of I -9 mm-size tumours with no casting type calcification was about 95%.
The prognostic significance of h istopathological typing, grading and staging of tumours is of proven value in the clinical management of breast cancer patients. but sometimes the histopathological assessment correlates poorly with the clinical outcome. Recently these conventional methods are augmented by new techniques for assess ing the type of the tumour, grade and stage, in order to improve the accuracy and reproducibility of prognostication. These prognostic indicators include receptors for hormones, growth factors and oncogenes. Breast cancers that express estrogen and progesterone receptors are associated with longer survival as compared to the negative ones 13. A number of oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes are expressed according to the behavior of tumours. These include c-myc, ras, p53 and c-erb B­2/HER2/neu oncogenes14. The expression of c-erb B2 has been identified as an independent prognostic marker15. DNA ploidy, S-phase fraction and immunohistochemical detection of Ki-67 have been used as markers of cellular proliferation16. Tumours with high proliferation rates have a worse prognosis. The adoption of these markers in routine practice is slow and many laboratories may not have sufficient resources to implement them and the results do not necessarily influence the clinical management of individual patients.
In Pakistan there should be public awareness regarding breast cancer problem. This requires through communication media and imposition of mass education program. There is a need for establishment and implementation of breast cancer screening program, so that early lesions can be detected with a better survival.
Continued research on the cause of the disease, prevention and improved methods of detection and treatment are essential if we are to make inroads into this, the leading cancer in the world.


1. Yonemoto R. Breast cancer in Japan and United Stases. Epidemiologv, hormone eceptors, pathology, and survival. Arch. Surg.,1980;1 15:1056-62.
2. Chaudary MA. Hayward JL, Bnlhrook RU, et al. A comparison of epidem iological characteristics in breast cancer patients and normal females in Great Britain and Japan: results of prospective study. Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 1991:1 8(suppll):S I 9-S22.
3. Harris JR, Morrow NI, Bonadonlna G. cancer of the breast. In: Cancer principles and practice of oncology. 4th ed.: Devita VT, Hellman 5, Roserberg SA. Philadelphia, JP Lippincott Co, 1996, p. 1260.
4. Juan R. Ackeman’s Surgical Pathology, Eighth editioti. Vol.2, 1996, p. 1590.
5. Rana F, Yonnus J, Muzammil A, et al. Breast cancer epidetniologv in Pakistani women. JCPSP, 1999;8:20-23.
6. Malik IA, Mushtaq 5, Khan Aft, et al. A morphological study of 280 mastectomy spectmens of Breast carcinoma. vats. J. Pathol., 1992;S:5-8.
7. Ahmed N. Breast earcinottia itt Pakistani women: I tow it differs frotti tlsc west. J. Surg., 1991:2:56-58.
8. Kelsey JL, Horn-Ross PL. I3reast cancer: magnitude of the problem atid descriptive epidetniology. Epidemiot. Rev., 1993:15:1 7-26.
9. Futreal PA, PL. Shattuck—Eidena PL et.al. BRCA—1 inutations in prituarv breast and ovarian earcinotuas. 5cience, 1994;266:120-22.
10. Peter PA, Roderick N, Mac5ween NI. Breast cancer sercentng, Principles and practicalitics for hissopathologists. Recent Aclv. Histopattiot., 1989;14:43-61.
11. Bassett LW, Gantbhir 5. Breast imaging for the l990s. Semin. Oncol., 199 1;18:80-86.
12. Laszio T, llsiu-His C, Stephen W, et al. A novel tstethod for prediction of long tenn outcome of women with TI a, T1b and 10—14 mm invasive breast cancers: a prospective study. Latteet, 2000:355:429-33,
13. Battifora H, Mehta P. AIm C, et al. Estrogen receptor imtnunohiasoehetnistry assay in paraffin embedded tissue. A better gold standard? AppI. lmtttmmtttsohi stochetn., 1993;1:39-45.
14. Barnes DM, Dublin EA, Fisher CJ, et al. Immunohistochemical detection of p53 protein in mamtnary earcinoma. An important new independent itidicator of progmmosis? Hum. Pathol., 1993:24:469-76.
15. Heintz NH, Lesilie KO, Rogers LA, et al. Amplificatiott of the C-erb B-2 oncogetme and progmtosis of breast adenocarcinoma. Arch. Pathol., lab. Med 1990: 114: l60-63.
16. Weinberg DS. Proliferation imsdices in solid tumoors. Adv. Pathol. Lab. Mccl., 1992:5:163.

Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees: