May 2002, Volume 52, Issue 5

Short Reports

HCV Serotypes in Karachi: a Liaquat National Hospital Experience

N. Ansari  ( Liaquat National Hospital, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi. )
A. Ahmed  ( Liaquat National Hospital, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi. )
J. Esmail  ( Liaquat National Hospital, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi. )
S. A. Mujeeb  ( Liaquat National Hospital, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi. )


The identification of hepatitis C virus and development of serological assays provide an important opportunity to diagnose HCV infection and prevent its transmission through transfusion of blood1. Further studies on HCV typing may help clinicians and public health authorities to develop appropriate protocols for management and control of the disease.
This study reports the prevalence of HCV serotypes among HCV positive patients at Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, during the year 2000-2001.

Material, Methods and Results

A total of 306 clinically suspected hepatitis C patients who were repeatedly reactive for anti-HCV antibodies on Axsym (Abbott Laboratories, Chicago), were tested for HCV serotypes (Murex Diagnostic, Dartford, UK). Of these 173 (56.5%) were males and 133 (43.4%) females. A total of 255 (83.3%) were typeable and 5 1(16.6%) were untypeable. Among 255 typeable sera 198 (77.6%) were of type 3 , followed by type 1, thirty one (12%), type 6, seven (2.7%), type 2, six (2.3%), type 4, six (2.3%), and type 5 one (0.4%). Six patients (2.3%) had mixed infections. Among six mixed sera three were of type 3 and type 1, two were of type 3 and type 2 and one sera was of type 3 and type 6.


HCV type 3 appears to be the most common serotype of HCV infection in the country aa reported in other studies2,3. Sixteen percent cases were untypable.
There can be several reasons to explain high untypablity in the studied population. It may be because of false reactivity on initial screening tests, as few HCV reactive sera are confirmed on confirmatory assay-MBA in the country. Besides, it has been reported that antibodies to NS4 epitope, an epitope that is used for subtype classification, develops following development of antibodies to core and NS3 epitopes of HCV. Therefore a person may remain untypeable in earlier stages of infection. Since HCV RNA is usually detectable very soon after infection, genotyping analysis is the only method available during this window period1. On the other hand that antibodies to NS4 epitopes do not persist for a long time after clearance of the virus. therefore, a person exposed to the virus but becomes negative for the infection can also have untypeable sera4. Two percent had mixed infection. These patients might have exposures to more than one type of virus in the recent past. A cross reactivity may also give mixed infection type results1. HCV subtypes may have different clinical implications5. Firstly, the efficacy of serological screening assays may be different1. Secondly, the epidemiology of e.g., type 3 appears to be detected more often in relation to intravenous drug abuse in some countries of the world6. Whether the levels of viremia are really type dependent remains obscure7. Furthermore, the severity as well as the progression rate of the liver disease may differ8. Finally there are indications that the efficacy of interferon treatment may also depend on the viral subtypes9.


1.Doom LJV, Kleter B, Pike 1, et al. Analysis of hepatitis C virus isolats by serotyping and genotyping. J. Clin. Microbiol., 1996;34: 1784-7.
2.1994,19:1088-94 z.Shan HA, Jam w, Malik I, et at, Hepatius L virus (HCV) genotypes and chronic liver disease in Pakistan. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., 1997;12:758-61.
3.Arif A, Zuben SJ. Serotyping of chronic hepatitis C in Pakistani patients.
4.Yuki NN, Komado T. Quantitative analysis of antibodies to hepatitis C virus during interferon-alpha therapy. Hepatology, 1993; 17:960-65.
5.Dusheiko GH, Schnilovitz-weiss DBF, Mc0mish PL, et al. Hepatitis C virus genotypes: a investigation of type specific differences in geographic origin and disease. Hepatology,1994;19:13.
6.Pawlotsky JM, Tsakiris F, Roudot-Thoraval C, et al. Relationship between nepatitis C virus genotypes and source of intection in patients with chronic hepatitis C. J. Infect. Dis., 1995;171:1607-10.
7.Lau JYN, Simmonds P, Urden M. Implications of variations of “conserved” regions of hepatitis C virus genome. Lancet, 1995;346:425-6.
8.Feray C, M. Gigou D, Samuet V. et al. Influence of the genotypes of hepatitis C virus on the severity of recurrent liver disease after liver transplantation. Gastroenterology, 1995;1 08:1088-96.
9.Pontisso PM, Gerotto I, Chemello C, et al. Hepatitis C virus genotypes HCV­ Ia and HCV Ib: the clinical point of view. J. Infect. Dis., 1995;171:760.

Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees: