July 2022, Volume 72, Issue 7

Student's Corner

Risk factors for intensive care unit admission and mortality among adult meningitis patients

Usama Waqar  ( Year 3 MBBS Student, Medical College, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan. )
Ainan Arshad  ( Department of Medicine, Aga khan University, Karachi, Pakistan )
Ahmed Ayaz  ( Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan; 6 5th Year MBBS Student, Medical College, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan )
Muhammad Sarmad Tahir  ( 3rd Year MBBS Student, Medical College, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan. )
Daniyal Ali Khan  ( 3rd Year MBBS Student, Medical College, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan )
Russell Seth Martins  ( 5th Year MBBS Student, Medical College, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan )
Dureshahwar Kanwar  ( Department of Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan. )
Bushra Jamil  ( Department of Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan. )

Abstract

Objective: To assess the risk factors for intensive care unit admission and inpatient all-cause mortality among adult meningitis patients.

 

Method: The retrospective study was conducted at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, and comprised of patients of either gender aged ≥18 years diagnosed with bacterial, viral, or tuberculous meningitis between July 2010 and June 2019. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to explore independent predictors of inpatient mortality and intensive care unit admission. Data was analysed using SPSS 24.

 

Results: Of the 929 patients with suspected meningitis, 506(54.5%) had confirmatory diagnosis. Of them, 303(59.9%) were males. The overall median age of the sample was 47.0 years (interquartile range: 33.0 years). The most common aetiology was bacterial meningitis 324(64%), followed by viral meningitis 141(27.9%). Incidence of inpatient mortality was 53(10.5%), while 75(14.8%) patients required intensive care unit admission. Tuberculous aetiology, intensive care unit admission, concurrent encephalitis, hydrocephalus, inpatient neurosurgery, and longer length of hospital stay were predictors of mortality (p<0.05). Non-indication of blood culture was found to be associated with reduced risk of mortality (p<0.05). For intensive care unit admission, diabetes mellitus, presentation with seizure, imaging suggestive of meningitis, and inpatient neurosurgery were associated with higher risk of admission, while hypertension, presentation with headache, viral aetiology and non-indication of blood culture reduced the risk (p<0.05).

 

Conclusion: Adult meningitis patients tend to have poor expected outcomes, and their management strategies should be planned accordingly.

 

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.4482

 



Introduction

 

Meningitis is a serious infection that results in inflammation of the meninges covering the brain and the spinal cord. With widespread vaccination against certain causative organisms, there has been a significant change in the epidemiology of meningitis, and the spectrum is shifting from paediatric to adult patients.1-3However, despite these advances, meningitis still accounts for significant mortality, and a high proportion of meningitis patients require intensive care unit (ICU) admission.4

Pakistan ranks 46th in the world in terms of meningitis-related mortality, with an age-adjusted mortality rate of 5.57 per 100,000 population.5 Being a resource-limited country, Pakistan has scarce ICU resources, with only 1.5 critical care beds available to cater to a population of 100,000.6 This situation necessitates efficient and evidence-based utilisation of these limited hospital resources along with an increased focus on national healthcare capacity-building activities.

Owing to limited resources, healthcare and intensive care in Pakistan and other low and middle-income countries (LMICs) are disproportionately impacted by ICU admissions due to meningitis. While several studies have been conducted globally to identify predictors of mortality and ICU admission, these studies are scarce in Pakistan and other LMICs.7-13Evidence-based healthcare delivery warrants setting-specific research. The current study was planned to identify predictors of inpatient mortality and ICU admission among meningitis patients within an LMIC context.

 

Patients and Methods

 

The retrospective study was conducted at the Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH), Karachi, and comprised data between July 2010 and June 2019. The study was exempted by the institutional ethics review committee because only routinely available patient data was collected from the medical records without any direct interaction with patients.

The AKUH is an academic tertiary care centre accredited with the Joint Commission International (JCI).14 It has an overall capacity of 700 hospital beds with13 general care, 5 special care, and 9 intensive care beds dedicated for neurology. Clinical and diagnostic information is archived in an in-house computerised data system in a retrievable form.

The data of adult patients of either gender diagnosed with meningitis was retrieved. The data was classified into bacterial, viral and tuberculous meningitis groups.15,16

In bacterial meningitis, diagnosis was established when patients had positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture or Gram’s stain or alternatively had three of the following findings in their CSF:  white blood cell (WBC) counts ≥1,000 cells/mL; neutrophils >80% of the total WBCs; protein >100mg/dL; and glucose ≤40mg/dL. And at least one of the typical symptoms of meningitis was present, like neck rigidity, fever, altered mental status, or severe headache.15 In viral meningitis, diagnosis was established when patients presented with clinical features of meningitis and had negative CSF culture or Gram’s stains, negative CSF cryptococcal antigen test, and normal CSF findings, like normal glucose, normal or slightly elevated protein and lymphocytic predominance, along with the exclusion of nonviral causes of aseptic meningitis.16

In tuberculous meningitis, diagnosis was established when patients had clinical features of meningitis with negative CSF Gram stain and cultures for bacteria and negative CSF cryptococcal antigen test with either typical CSF findings, like pleocytosis with lymphocytic predominance, elevated protein, and low glucose, or evidence of active tuberculosis (TB) at another body site.16

Data of patients with initial suspicion of meningitis without any confirmatory diagnoses, including those who did not undergo CSF analyses, was excluded.

Data was retrieved from the computerised data system and cross-checked with patient medical records using a pre-designed proforma. Information collected for each patient included age, gender, comorbidities, presenting signs and symptoms, concurrent encephalitis, brain imaging evidence suggesting meningitis, blood culture(s), CSF analyses and culture(s), antimicrobial susceptibility analyses, development of hydrocephalus, requirement of neurosurgical intervention, like ventriculoperitoneal shunt, external ventricular drain, or decompression, antimicrobial treatment, dexamethasone prescription, and length of stay. The primary outcomes were inpatient all-cause mortality and ICU admission.

Comorbidities included hypertension (HTN) (systolic blood pressure [SBP] ≥130mmHg or diastolic blood pressure [DBP] ≥80mmHg),17 diabetes mellitus (DM) (International Classification of Diseases-10 [ICD-10] codes E08 to E13), ischaemic heart disease (IHD) (ICD-10 codes I20 to I25), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] <60mL/min/1.73 m2 for 3 or more months),18 malignancy, chronic liver disease having progressive deterioration of hepatic function for >6 months19 and existence of immunosuppression including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status, use of steroid therapies, chemotherapy, or other immunosuppressive drugs. Imaging techniques included magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed topography (CT) scans.

Data was analysed using SPSS 24. Categorical variables were described using frequencies and percentages, and chi-square test was used to test the differences in their distributions in outcome groups. Fisher’s exact test was used when assumptions for the chi-square test were not met. Shapiro-Wilk test for normality was conducted for continuous variables, which were found to have non-parametric distributions (p<0.001). Hence, median (interquartile range [IQR]) and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to report these variables and compare their differences in the outcome groups.

Multivariable binary logistic regression models were employed to establish the relationship between clinicodemographic covariates and outcomes. Clinically relevant covariates occurring prior to outcomes and with p<0.25 on univariable logistic regression analyses were entered into the multivariable regression models. All statistical analyses were two-sided. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

 

Results

 

Of the 929 patients with suspected meningitis, 506(54.5%) had confirmatory diagnosis. Of them, 303(59.9%) were males. The overall median age of the sample was 47.0 years (IQR: 33.0 years). Comorbidities were found in 263(52%) patients, with the commonest being HTN 194(38.3%) and DM 160(31.6%). Most patients presented to the hospital with fever 326(64.4%) and consciousness disturbance 233(46.0%).

Of the total, 324(64%) patients were diagnosed with bacterial, 141(27.9%) with viral and 41(8.1%) with tuberculous meningitis. Concurrent encephalitis was diagnosed based on clinical findings or imaging in 148(29.2%) patients, while CSF cultures were positive in 62(12.3%) patients. Of the 62 organisms isolated, streptococcus pneumoniae was the most common [32(51.6%)], followed by acinetobacter species and staphylococcus aureus [5(8.1% each)]. Other organisms included escherichia coli [3(4.8%)], streptococcus agalactiae [3(4.8%)], elizabethkingia meningoseptica [2(3.2%)], enterococcus species [2(3.2%)], group d streptococcus [2(3.2%)], klebsiella pneumoniae [2(3.2%)], unclassified streptococci [2(3.2%)], citrobacter freundii [1(1.6%)], haemophilus influenzae [1(1.6%)], listeria monocytogenes [1(1.6%)], and pseudomonas aeruginosa [1(1.6%)].

Incidence of inpatient mortality was 53(10.5%). Older patients had higher inpatient mortality than younger ones (p=0.017) (Table 1). In terms of comorbidities, patients with DM, IHD, CKD and chronic liver disease were more likely to belong to the mortality group compared to those without these comorbidities (p<0.05). Mortality rates were also higher in patients with encephalitis, hydrocephalus, those requiring inpatient neurosurgical intervention, and patients with prolonged length of stay (p<0.05).

 

 

The most common treatment regimen comprised ceftriaxone, vancomycin and acyclovir 340(67.2%). Dexamethasone was given to 415(82%) patients. Compared to non-mortality group, patients with mortality received antimicrobials for shorter durations (p<0.001) and were more commonly treated with meropenem (p<0.001), colistin (p<0.001) and fluoroquinolones (p<0.001). Antimicrobial resistance to ampicillin and ceftriaxone was more common in the mortality group (p<0.05).

Risk factors of inpatient mortality included tuberculous aetiology, ICU admission, concurrent diagnosis of encephalitis, hydrocephalus, inpatient neurosurgery, and longer length of hospital stay, while non-indication of blood culture was associated with reduced risk of mortality (Table 2).

 

 

A total of 75(14.8%) patients required ICU admission. Compared to the non-ICU group, patients with seizures were significantly more in the ICU group (p<0.001), while those of patients presenting with headache and neck stiffness were significantly lower in the ICU group (p<0.05). Hydrocephalus, inpatient neurosurgery, longer length of stay and inpatient mortality were also more common in the ICU group (p<0.05).

The ICU group received antimicrobials for longer durations (p<0.001) and were more commonly treated with vancomycin (p=0.011), meropenem (p<0.001), colistin (p<0.001), rifampin (p=0.003), fluoroquinolones (p<0.001), ampicillin (p=0.020) and fluconazole (p<0.001). Antimicrobial resistance to meropenem was more common in the ICU group (p=0.026).

Risk factors for ICU admission included DM, presentation with seizure, imaging suggestive of meningitis, and inpatient neurosurgery, while HTN, presentation with headache, viral aetiology, and non-indication of blood culture were associated with reduced risk of requiring ICU admission (Table 3).

 

 

Discussion

 

Meningitis in adult patients is associated with significant mortality and morbidity. In this study, the incidence of inpatient mortality was observed to be 10.5% which was lower compared to similar studies conducted

globally.4,8-10,20 However, most of these studies were published in the 1990s and 2000s. The burden of mortality among meningitis patients has been alleviated, considering improvements in management and standards of healthcare delivery in the past years12 Additionally, the current study only assessed mortality during the index admission. Mortality rates among adult meningitis patients could be even higher in Pakistan when accounted for post-discharge mortality.

In this study, most of the patients were prescribed antimicrobials, including patients with viral meningitis. This might be attributed to diagnostic delays and empirical treatment with ceftriaxone and vancomycin until aetiology has been determined. Patients with mortality tended to receive antimicrobials for shorter durations compared to the non-mortality cohort. This was because antimicrobials were stopped at the time of death for the mortality group, but continued for the non-mortality group beyond discharge to complete regular courses. In addition, patients with mortality tended to receive meropenem, colistin and fluoroquinolones more often. At AKUH, meropenem and fluoroquinolones are indicated in patients who have received suboptimal doses of cephalosporins at referring healthcare facilities, considering the high resistance to cephalosporines in Pakistan. Moreover, colistin is only indicated in resistant cases with poor response to primary antimicrobials. Such cases are expected to have poorer prognoses, and that could explain the association observed in the current study.

On multivariable logistic regression, concurrent diagnosis of encephalitis (3.047 [1.074-8.644]), hydrocephalus (5.841 [1.055 -32.350]), and longer length of hospital stay (1.836 [1.494-2.257]) were found to be predictors of inpatient mortality. Several studies have reported the association of longer length of stay and mortality for different diseases,21,22 but the current study is unique when it comes to adult meningitis patients. Hydrocephalus is a dangerous complication that often requires surgical intervention. The current findings in this regard are in accordance with other studies.23-25 Additionally, tuberculous aetiology, ICU admission and inpatient neurosurgery were found to be risk factors of mortality. Other studies have also reported a higher incidence of mortality in cases of tuberculous meningitis compared to non-tuberculous aetiologies. Neurosurgical interventions are sometimes indicated for the management of complications in meningitis patients, such as hydrocephalus. Such interventions can potentially increase the risk of hospital-acquired infections, contributing to mortality and morbidity in such patients.26

Being an LMIC, Pakistan has limited hospital resources. There are only 1.5 critical care beds per 100,000 population. This number is significantly lower than high-income countries (HICs), like Taiwan, Singapore and Japan (28.5, 11.4, and 7.3 respectively), but it is comparable to other LMICs, such as India, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka (2.3, 0.7, and 2.3 respectively).6 In these resource-limited settings, it is imperative to identify predictors of ICU admission to inform the evidence-based allocation of ICU beds and hospital resources.

In this cohort of adult meningitis patients, the incidence of ICU admission was 14.8%. This is significantly lower than existing literature, which places incidence of ICU admission between 34.2% and 79%.9,13,27 This could be attributed to Pakistan being an LMIC with limited healthcare resources, allowing only the most high-risk patients. At AKUH, ICU admission is only indicated for patients with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score <8, hypoxic state, and/or status epilepticus.

On adjusted analyses, risk of ICU admission was independently associated with DM, HTN, presentation with seizure(s) or headache, imaging suggestive of meningitis, viral aetiology, and inpatient neurosurgery. Presentation with seizures has been previously associated with increased mortality and severe neurological deficits.9,11Aronin et al. also recommended that meningitis patients presenting with seizures should be managed and observed in ICUs to improve prognosis.11 Other risk factors of ICU admission identified in the current study have not been reported in literature and necessitate further research.

On adjusted analysis, non-indication of blood culture was found to be associated with reduced mortality and need for ICU admission. Blood cultures are usually indicated in meningitis patients when lumber punctures cannot be performed or when CSF analyses are insignificant. In such cases, blood cultures can assist in identifying causative organisms and provide antimicrobial susceptibility analyses.12 Better prognoses in cases without indication of blood culture could be attributed to early diagnoses via CSF analyses, eliminating the need for blood cultures while allowing timely and evidence-based management of patients.

Physicians managing meningitis patients in Pakistan should anticipate poorer prognoses with the highlighted risk factors. Early anticipation followed by optimisation of care could potentially improve outcomes among meningitis patients nationally.

The current study has some limitations. It was performed retrospectively, and post-discharge outcomes were not evaluated. More evidence is needed to determine prognostic factors in patients with adult meningitis, especially in an LMIC setting.

 

 

Conclusion

 

Healthcare personnel providing care to adult meningitis patients should expect poor outcomes with the highlighted risk factors and plan their management strategies accordingly. With prior anticipation, they can strive for providing early and prompt care to high-risk patients. This can potentially lead to improvements in resource utilisation, especially in resource-limited settings, while also improving outcomes in meningitis patients.

 

Disclaimer: The abstract was presented at the 12th Annual Health Sciences Research Assembly at the Aga Khan University, Karachi.

 

Conflict of interest: None.

 

Source of Funding: None.

 

References

 

1.      McIntyre PB, O'Brien KL, Greenwood B, Van De Beek D. Effect of vaccines on bacterial meningitis worldwide. Lancet 2012; 380: 1703-11.

2.      Van de Beek D, Brouwer MC, Thwaites GE, Tunkel AR. Advances in treatment of bacterial meningitis. Lancet 2012; 380: 1693-702.

3.      Thigpen MC, Whitney CG, Messonnier NE, Zell ER, Lynfield R, Hadler JL, et al. Bacterial meningitis in the United States, 1998–2007. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 2016-25.

4.      Van de Beek D, De Gans J, Spanjaard L, Weisfelt M, Reitsma JB, Vermeulen M. Clinical features and prognostic factors in adults with bacterial meningitis. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1849-59.

5.      World Health Rankings. Pakistan: Meningitis. [Online] [Cited 2020 September 19]. Available from: URL: https://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/pakistan-meningitis.

6.      Phua J, Faruq MO, Kulkarni AP, Redjeki IS, Detleuxay K, Mendsaikhan N, et al. Critical care bed capacity in Asian countries and regions. Crit Care Med 2020; 48: 654-62.

7.      Dzupova O, Rozsypal H, Prochazka B, Benes J. Acute bacterial meningitis in adults: predictors of outcome. Scand J Infect Dis 2009; 41: 348-54.

8.      Durand ML, Calderwood SB, Weber DJ, Miller SI, Southwick FS, Caviness Jr VS, et al. Acute bacterial meningitis in adults--A review of 493 episodes. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 21-8.

9.      Flores-Cordero JM, Amaya-Villar R, Rincón-Ferrari MD, Leal-Noval SR, Garnacho-Montero J, Llanos-Rodríguez AC, et al. Acute community-acquired bacterial meningitis in adults admitted to the intensive care unit: clinical manifestations, management and prognostic factors. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29: 1967-73.

 

10.    Lu CH, Huang CR, Chang WN, Chang CJ, Cheng BC, Lee PY, et al. Community-acquired bacterial meningitis in adults: the epidemiology, timing of appropriate antimicrobial therapy, and prognostic factors. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2002; 104: 352-8.

11.    Aronin SI, Peduzzi P, Quagliarello VJ. Community-acquired bacterial meningitis: risk stratification for adverse clinical outcome and effect of antibiotic timing. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129(11_Part_1): 862-9.

12.    Brouwer MC, Tunkel AR, van de Beek D. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and antimicrobial treatment of acute bacterial meningitis. Clin Microbiol Rev 2010; 23: 467-92.

13.    Dauchy FA, Gruson D, Chene G, Viot J, Bebear C, Maugein J, et al. Prognostic factors in adult community-acquired bacterial meningitis: a 4-year retrospective study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2007; 26: 743-6.

14.    Joint Commission International. Accreditation. [Online] [Cited 2021 December 20]. Available from: URL: https://www.jointcommissioninternational.org/accreditation/.

15.    Sheley J, Willman D, Downen J, Bergman S. Investigation of the selection and timing of pharmacological therapy in community-acquired bacterial meningitis. P T 2016; 41: 437-41.

16.    Thinyane KH, Motsemme KM, Cooper VJL. Clinical presentation, aetiology, and outcomes of meningitis in a setting of high HIV and TB prevalence. J Trop Med 2015; 2015: 423161.

17.    Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE, Collins KJ, Dennison Himmelfarb C, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/ APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension 2018; 71: 1269-324.

18.    Levey AS, Eckardt KU, Tsukamoto Y, Levin A, Coresh J, Rossert J, et al. Definition and classification of chronic kidney disease: a position statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney Int 2005; 67: 2089-100.

19.    Sharma A, Nagalli S. Chronic Liver Disease. [Updated 2021 Nov 25]. In: StatPearls [Online]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan-. Available from: URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ books/NBK554597/

20.    Meyer C, Samuelsson I, Galle M, Bangsborg JM. Adult bacterial meningitis: aetiology, penicillin susceptibility, risk factors, prognostic factors and guidelines for empirical antibiotic treatment. Clin Microbiol Infect 2004; 10: 709-17.

21.    Philbin EF, Roerden JB. Longer hospital length of stay is not related to better clinical outcomes in congestive heart failure. Am J Manag Care 1997; 3: 1285-91.

22.    Reynolds K, Butler MG, Kimes TM, Rosales AG, Chan W, Nichols GA. Relation of acute heart failure hospital length of stay to subsequent readmission and all-cause mortality. Am J Cardiol 2015; 116: 400-5.

23.    Arsura EL, Johnson R, Penrose J, Stewart K, Kilgore W, Reddy CM, et al. Neuroimaging as a guide to predict outcomes for patients with coccidioidal meningitis. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 40: 624-7.

24.    Chan K, Cheung R, Fong C, Tsang K, Mak W, Ho S. Clinical relevance of hydrocephalus as a presenting feature of tuberculous meningitis. QJM: An Int J Med 2003; 96: 643-8.

25.    Wang KW, Chang WN, Chang HW, Wang HC, Lu CH. Clinical relevance of hydrocephalus in bacterial meningitis in adults. Surg Neurol 2005; 64: 61-5.

26.    Bruce AM, Lorber J, Shedden W, Zachary R. Persistent bacteraemia following ventriculo‐caval shunt operations for hydrocephalus in infants. Dev Med Child Neurol 1963; 5: 461-70.

27.    Hsu CL, Chang CH, Wong KN, Chen KY, Yu CJ, Yang PC. Management of severe community-acquired septic meningitis in adults: from emergency department to intensive care unit. J Formos Med Assoc 2009; 108: 112-8.

 

Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees: