July 2022, Volume 72, Issue 7

Research Article

Cognition improvement strategies, study behaviours and stress among medical students of Dow University of Health Sciences: A cross-sectional study

Syed Muhammad Ashraf Jahangeer  ( Department of Community Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences,Karachi, Pakistan )
Muhammad Hamdan  ( 5th Year MBBS Student, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan )
Ushna Sunain Ansari  ( 5th Year MBBS Student, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan )
Huzaif Saeed Khan  ( 5th Year MBBS Student, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan )
Rida Fatima  ( 5th Year MBBS Student, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan. )


Objective: To determine the effects of cognition improvement strategies on academic performance, stress and sleep quality of medical students.

Method: The cross-sectional study was conducted at the Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, from March 2019 to March 2020, and comprised medical students regardless of gender and academic year. Academic performance was assessed through grade point average, while stress and sleep were assessed using the Perceived Stress Scale and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Data was analysed using SPSS 25.


Result: Of the 770 subjects, 748(97%) formed the final sample with mean age 20.32±1.49 years; 619(82.7%) females and 129(17.2%) males. Overall, there were 655(87.6%) consumers of cognitive enhancers and 93(12.4%) non-cunsumers. The mean Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score of consumers was 6.05±3.306, while that of non-consumers was 5.80±3.701. The respective mean Perceived Stress Scale scores were 21.18±6.09 and 20.5±6.8. There was no significant association of consumption of cognitive enhancers with academic performance and stress levels (p>0.05), but it was significant with sleep quality (p<0.05).


Conclusion: Majority of the students were found to be consuming cognitive enhancers, but no significant association of the stimulants was found with either academic performance or stress.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.3801


Cognitive enhancement encompasses all the interventions, either synthetic or natural, that are used for the purpose of boosting alertness, and increasing memory and concentration.1 Cognitive enhancers are said to be any of the drugs used in order to obtain higher levels of alertness and for prolonging this state of alertness and focus.

As per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (DSM-5),2  caffeine, one of the commonly used cognitive stimulants, can cause physical, mental and psychomotor impairments upon its withdrawal. The use of certain smart drugs commonly prescribed, like methylphenidate and modafinil,3  narcotics, like cocaine and amphetamine, and soft enhancers, like phyto drugs, soft drinks, vitamins, tonics,4  tobacco,1  coffee and caffeine pills, is practiced for cognitive enhancement. According to a research conducted in Pakistan, about one-fifth of students admitted to the use of psychoactive substances.5  Caffeine and nicotine, two major substances, are the most common psychostimulant drugs used worldwide.6  A recent study in a public-sector medical university found that caffeine was consumed by 95% students.7  Some studies demonstrated that smoking was the preferred method of nicotine use for (78.9%)8 and (26.3%)9  students. The effects of caffeine are largely dose-related. A study revealed that at low doses, caffeine promotes wakefulness, confidence and vigour, while at high doses an individual portrays the characteristics of an addict, like having increased sense of power, which may lead to a euphoretic state.10

Studies showed that the common reasons behind cognitive stimulant consumption were to feel more alert, to wake up in the morning, to combat headaches, to ameliorate the mood, to concentrate while studying, and to deal with stress and depression.11,12 Evidence suggests that the use of stimulants and high-caffeinated products increases with class seniority and male gender.13  Also, perceived stress was found to be higher in medical students of higher age group.14

As can be imagined, the constituents of cognitive stimulants have a negative effect on sleep in one way or the other. This was supported by a study showing poor sleep had significant relation with smoking and caffeine consumption.15

It has been seen that the cognitive enhancers were being used more by those students who were going through stressful periods or were under any sort of academic pressure or those with psychiatric disorders.4 Another study found that the quality of sleep was inversely related to, while caffeine consumption was directly related to, stressful periods. Nicotine consumption, however, did not vary with any of these factors.16

The high academic load of medical students makes them stressed. A study showed daily caffeine intake had a significant relationship with academic-related stressors.17  The increase in consumption of cognitive enhancers was also noted in the pre-exam period.18  To overcome these high stress levels, students make high use of cognitive enhancers. A study showed that academic stress in university students correlated inversely with the number of days left in the exams, compelling them to consume alcohol, caffeine and nicotine which ultimately compromised their sleep quality.16

As determined by the DSM-5, the potential of caffeine to cause addiction has proved that seemingly harmless caffeinated substances, like tea, coffee and energy drinks, can also be a cause of addiction and, ultimately, lead to withdrawal symptoms.2  Influenced by peers, it has become a trend among the students to consume enhancers for improving their academic skills.

The current study was planned to determine the effects of cognition improvement strategies on academic performance, stress and sleep quality of medical students.


Subjects and Methods


The cross-sectional study was conducted from March 2019 to March 2020 at the Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS), Karachi, which is a large-scale public-sector university. After approval from the institutional ethics review board, the sample size was calculated using OpenEpi calculator www.openepi.com19  while keeping the lowest frequency of substance use at 2%, confidence limits as 1% at 95% confidence interval (CI). The sample was raised using consecutive sampling technique. Those included were medical students regardless of gender and academic year who volunteered to participate. Students who were on anti-depressant therapy or withdrawal rehabilitation therapy at the time of the study were excluded.

The participants were enrolled after they filled out a survey form through online Google Forms and printed questionnaires. The language of the survey form was English over which the subjects had a good command. Both the online and printed questionnaires were identical to standardise the data-collection process and to maintain the authenticity for eradication of potential sources of bias. All data was voluntary and was based on participant’s own perception and assessment of substance usage. The participants were complimentarily given relevant information in the form of a brochure related to substance abuse.

The survey instrument comprised multiple questions regarding the participant’s sociodemographic data, including age, gender, year of study, institute, job/volunteerism. The data was collected anonymously. The participants were asked about their source of cognitive enhancer, frequency and timing of intake, and average daily intake.

To appraise the sleep quality, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) was used.20  The total score ranging from 0 to 21 was calculated by the sum of seven sub-scores ranging 0-3. A sum of 5 or more indicated poor sleep quality, while a total score of 4 or less meant good sleep quality.

For classifying stress, the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) was used.21   It had 10 questions graded 0-4. Total score was categorised into low stress (0-13), moderate stress (14-26) and high stress (27-40). Academic performance was evaluated through self-made ranges of cumulative Grade Point Average (cGPA), which were: 3.6-4.0 (excellent), 3.1-3.5 (good), 2.5-3.0 (fair) and ≤2.5 (poor).

The subjects were asked if they tried to quit any specific substance that they were consuming. They were questioned about the reasons for taking these substances and the adverse effects they encountered upon consumption, which were further categorised into neurological, cardiac and digestive complaints. Lastly, their awareness regarding the constituents of cognition-enhancing items and their potential adverse effects was assessed. A pilot study was conducted for pretesting the questionnaires, and necessary changes were made.

The whole process was carried out in accordance with the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines (Annexure).22 



Data was analysed using SPSS 25. Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages, while quantitative variables were reported as mean±standard deviation. Descriptive analysis was carried out for the assessment of qualitative variables. The methods of cognitive enhancers consumption was compared with GPA ranges by using the chi-square test. For the evaluation of stress and sleep, total PSS and PSQI scores were compared to methods of consumption with the help of one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. Data was found to be normally distributed as assessed by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and Shapiro-Wilk test. Univariate analysis was conducted to explore the relationship involving the consumptions of cognitive enhancers, GPA, stress and sleep. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.


Of the 770 subjects, 748(97%) formed the final sample with mean age 20.32±1.49 years; 619(82.7%) females and 129(17.2%) males. Overall, there were 655(87.6%) consumers of cognitive enhancers and 93(12.4%) non-consumers.

The consumption of cognitive enhancers had no significant association with GPA (p=0.29). There was no significant difference in stress levels between the consumers and non-consumers (p=0.50). Consumption and stress levels also had no significant association (p>0.05). However, there was significant difference in sleep quality between the consumers and the non-consumers (p=0.036) (Table 2). The sleep quality of energy drink consumers was significantly poor compared to tea consumers (p=0.05).



Cigarette, chewing tobacco/naswar and pills for cognitive enhancement were interpreted as control items. Of the total, 206(27.5%) subjects were able to remain symptom-free without the consumption of their substance of interest for approximately 21-24 hours. Among the 655(87.6%) consumers, 165(25.2%) reported an attempt to quit. Overall, 596(80%) subjects were aware that cognitive enhancers can cause addiction, while 417(55.7%) participants were not aware that taurine is a vital ingredient of energy drinks.

The mean PSQI score of the consumers was 6.05±3.306, while that of the non-consumers was 5.80±3.701. The respective mean PSS scores were 21.18±6.09 and 20.5±6.8. The relationship of sleep quality with GPA categories among the consumers was noted (Figure).




Tea is the most widely consumed cognitive enhancer in the Indo-Pak region. Consequently, tea was found to be the most popular stimulant both in male and female students in the current study. Though the majority of students enrolled in the university and in the current study were females, tea was an equally popular stimulant in both the genders. A recent study conducted on the same population reported similar results.7 

It is presumed that increased consumption of cognitive enhancers would have beneficial effects on academic performance. However, in the current study, no significant relation was found between the two, as was reported by studies conducted in Europe23   and the United States.24 

A study conducted on medical students showed higher odds of developing poor sleep quality with coffee and energy drink consumption.25   This finding is consistent with the current findings. The overall sleep quality of the medical students in the current study was poor, as assessed by the PSQI scale.

Majority of the students were found to be in moderate stress, but no significant relationship was found between the consumption of cognitive enhancers and stress levels of medical students, which was in line with an earlier study.23 

The main reasons for consumption of items in the current study were to remain wakeful, to increase alertness, to relieve headache, and to be able to cope with academic stress. An American study showed that almost half of the participants used cognitive enhancers mainly to stay awake.26 

Any substance which messes with the brain chemistry has adverse effects if misused. A study showed physical and psychiatric side effects of nootropics on consumers.27   Students may benefit from these substances in the short term, but in the long run they can lead to adverse consequences. The current study demonstrated that the most common side effects due to excessive consumption of cognitive enhancers were neurological, followed by cardiac and digestive symptoms. Having knowledge of the adverse effects of cognitive enhancers on the body is essential for medical students since it is an important domain of neurosciences and psychiatry. The study found that almost 80% medical students were aware of the terrible consequence of cognitive stimulants i.e., addiction. The results are supported by a study done in Egypt.28 

In the current study, only about one-fourth of the consumers of cognitive enhancers tried to quit. The prevalence of substance abuse, like alcohol, cannabis and other allopathic drugs, is not high among medical students at DUHS. Also, the likelihood of nootropics, like tea or coffee, causing intolerable addiction is highly unlikely. Therefore, there is not enough data to demonstrate that medical students tried to abandon the substances they were consuming.

The primary limitation of the current study was that the number of female participants greatly exceeded the number of male counterparts. Also, the dose-response relationship could not be evaluated. The length of the questionnaire caused exhaustion among the respondents and could have led to memory bias. Most of the data was self-reported, lacking the authenticity of the facts and figures deduced. Many participants might not have reported the use of certain illicit drugs, probably owing to the stigma these substances hold in society.

In terms of strengths, a pilot study was done for pretesting the questionnaires. Consequently, changes were made on the basis of the feedback. Also, the study population was diverse, involving students from multiple departments of the same university. Besides, standardized scales were used to assess the stress and sleep quality of the participants.

The current study has highlighted the need for devising policies along with the promotion of educational campaigns, stress management seminars and expanded nutritional programmes. Proper measures should be enforced in educational institutions to limit the use of these substances on campuses. Also, there is a need for data to be gathered and disseminated among students and public health centres.






Majority of the students were found to be consuming cognitive enhancers, but no significant association of the stimulants was found with either academic performance or stress. The association with sleep quality, however, was significant.


Acknowledgement: We are grateful to all the study participants.


Disclaimer: None.


Conflict of Interest: None.


Source of Funding: None.




1.      McCabe SE, Knight JR, Teter CJ, Wechsler H. Non-medical use of prescription stimulants among US college students: Prevalence and correlates from a national survey. Addiction 2005; 100: 96-106.

2.      American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. [Online] [Cited 2021 Dec 12]. Available from: URL: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596

3.      Nicholson P, Mayho G, Sharp C. Cognitive enhancing drugs and the workplace. London: British Medical Association; 2015.

4.      Maier LJ, Liechti ME, Herzig F, Schaub MP. To dope or not to dope: neuroenhancement with prescription drugs and drugs of abuse among Swiss university students. PloS one 2013; 8: e77967.

5.      Nawaz H, Khan AA, Bukhari S. Use of psychoactive drugs among medical undergraduates in Abbottabad. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2017; 29: 599-603.

6.      Dager SR, Friedman SD. Brain imaging and the effects of caffeine and nicotine. Ann Med 2000; 32: 592-9.

7.      Khan MS, Nisar N, Naqvi SAA, Nawab F. Caffeine Consumption and Academic Performance among Medical Students of Dow University of Health Science (DUHS), Karachi, Pakistan. Ann Abbasi Shaheed Hosp Karachi Med Dent Coll 2017; 22: 3.

8.      Imran N, Haider II, Bhatti MR, So.comhail A, Zafar M. Prevalence of psychoactive drug use among medical students in Lahore. Ann King Edw Med Univ 2011; 17: 338.

9.      Mozafarinia R, Assarian M, Ziaaddini A. Prevalence of Substance Abuse among Students of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Addict Health 2017; 9: 103-9.

10.    Wood S, Sage JR, Shuman T, Anagnostaras SG. Psychostimulants and cognition: a continuum of behavioral and cognitive activation. Pharmacol Rev 2013; 66: 193-221.

11.    Devi SLS, Abilash SC, Basalingappa S. The Rationale of Caffeine Consumption and its Symptoms During Preparatory and Non-Preparatory Days: A Study Among Medical Students. Biomed Pharmacol J 2018; 11: 2.

12.    Aslam HM, Mughal A, Edhi MM, Saleem S, Rao MH, Aftab A et al. Assessment of pattern for consumption and awareness regarding energy drinks among medical students. Arch Public Health 2013; 71: 31.

13.    Kudlow PA, Treurnicht Naylor KT, Xie B, McIntyre RS. Cognitive enhancement in Canadian medical students. J Psychoactive Drugs 2013; 45: 360-5.

14.    Anuradha R, Dutta R, Raja JD, Sivaprakasam P, Patil AB. Stress and stressors among medical undergraduate students: A cross-sectional study in a private medical college in Tamil Nadu. Indian J Community Med 2017; 42: 222-5.

15.    Basu M, Saha SK, Majumder S, Chatterjee S, Misra R. A Study on Sleeping Pattern among Undergraduate Medical Students of a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital of Kolkata. Int J Med. Public Health 2019; 9: 118-24.

16.    Zunhammer M, Eichhammer P, Busch V. Sleep quality during exam stress: The role of alcohol, caffeine and nicotine. PloS one 2014; 9: e109490.

17.    Samaha A, Al Tassi A, Yahfoufi N, Gebbawi M, Rached M, Fawaz MA. Data on the relationship between caffeine addiction and stress among Lebanese medical students in Lebanon. Data Brief 2020; 28: 104845.

18.    Kusturica J, Hajdarević A, Nikšić H, Skopljak A, Tafi Z, Kulo A. Neuroenhancing Substances Use, Exam Anxiety and Academic Performance in Bosnian-Herzegovinian First-Year University Students. Acta Med Acad 2019; 48: 286-93.

19.    Dean AG. OpenEpi: open source epidemiologic statistics for public health, version 2.3. 1. [Online] [Cited 2021 Aug 12]. Available from: URL: http://www. openepi. com.

20.    Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res 1989; 28: 193-213.

21.    Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J  Health Soc Behav 1983; 24: 385-96.

22.    von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ 2007; 335: 806.

23.    Lengvenyte A, Strumila R, Grikiniene J. Use of cognitive enhancers among medical students in Lithuania. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 2016; 33:173-88.

24.    Arria AM, Caldeira KM, Vincent KB, O'Grady KE, Cimini MD, Geisner IM, et al. Do college students improve their grades by using prescription stimulants nonmedically? Addict Behav 2017; 65: 245-9.

25.    Sawah MA, Ruffin N, Rimawi M, Concerto C, Aguglia E, Chusid E, et al. Perceived stress and coffee and energy drink consumption predict poor sleep quality in podiatric medical students: a cross-sectional

study. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2015; 105: 429-34.

26.    Ríos JL, Betancourt J, Pagán I, Fabián C, Cruz SY, González AM, et al. Caffeinated-beverage consumption and its association with sociodemographic characteristics and self-perceived academic stress in first and second year students at the University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus (UPR-MSC). P R Health Sci J 2013; 32: 95-100.

27.    Talih F, Ajaltouni J. Probable Nootropicinduced Psychiatric Adverse Effects: A Series of Four Cases. Innov Clini Neurosci 2015; 12: 21-5.

28. Shalaby SF, Soliman MA. Knowledge, attitude, and practice of medical students regarding smoking and substance abuse, Cairo University, Egypt. J Egypt Public Health Assoc 2019; 94: 11.

Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees: