February 2022, Volume 72, Issue 2

Case Series

Clinical parameters and treatment outcome in patients of acromegaly: A retrospective analysis of 51 patients

Shahid Ahmed  ( Department of Endocrinology, Hearts International Hospital, Rawalpindi )
Ahmed Tashfeen Ashraf  ( Department of Neurosurgery, Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi )
Muhammad Junaid Mushtaq  ( Department of Neurosurgery, Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi )
Zujaja Hina Haroon  ( Department of Chemical Pathology and Endocrinology, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Rawalpindi, Pakistan. )

Abstract

The aim of the study was to analyze the pattern of clinical presentation and management outcome in patients of acromegaly. It is a cross-sectional study based on the clinical records of 51 patients of Acromegaly. All the recorded clinical data was analyzed to see the pattern of clinical presentation and management outcome. IBM SPSS statistics version 22 was used for statistical analysis. The median age was 32 years. Twenty-seven patients underwent surgery and 6 (22.2%) achieved remission. With pharmacological management, 35.8% patients achieved control of the disease with Octreotide LAR and 7.1% with cabergoline. Eighteen patients were treated with External Beam Radiation (EBR) and Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS). Remission rate has been 88.9% with SRS and 33.3% with EBR. The study shows higher prevalence of Growth Hormone (GH) secreting tumour in younger people and men. Remission rate was highest in patients treated with radiotherapy after partial response to TSS.

 

Keywords: Acromegaly, Trans-sphenoidal surgery, Radiotherapy, Octreotide.

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.2104

 

Introduction

 

Acromegaly is caused by the excess GH production by a pituitary tumour. Main manifestations are musculoskeletal features, cardiovascular disorder, hyperglycaemia, sleep apnoea, entrapment neuropathies, osteoarthritic changes etc. When this excessive GH production occurs before the closure of epiphysis, there is abnormal linear growth and gigantism results.1

Acromegaly is a rare disorder with an incidence of about 3 cases per million per year and the prevalence is about 60 per million. It is a slowly progressing disorder and the clinical features may go unnoticed for many years, often resulting in a delay of 7-10 years after the onset of symptoms.2 The morbidity and mortality associated with acromegaly is directly related to the degree of hypersecretion of GH by the tumour. Morbidity and mortality can be greatly reduced with early diagnosis and successful management.3 Treatment options for acromegaly include surgery, medical therapy, and radiotherapy, with an aim to reduce or normalize GH burden, improve clinical features and reduce or remove the tumour mass.

We are presenting an analysis of clinical data of 51 patients of Acromegaly and gigantism, with a discussion on management decisions in a resource limited environment and clinical outcome.

 

Case Series

 

This is a cross-sectional study based on the clinical records of 51 patients of Acromegaly and Gigantism who presented in the Endocrine Clinics of Military hospital Rawalpindi from Jan 2015 to Dec 2017 and Hearts International Hospital Rawalpindi from Jan 2018 to Jan 2020.  All the recorded clinical data was collected in June/July 2020 and analyzed to see the pattern of clinical presentation and management outcome. Obstructive sleep apnoea was diagnosed on the basis of clinical history suggesting excessive snoring and daytime lethargy and sleepiness. Biochemical diagnosis was made on the basis of raised basal serum GH levels, serum IGF-1 level and failure of GH to suppress below 1.0 mU/l with 75 g oral glucose load. Trans-sphenoidal surgery was the first line of treatment. Patients showing partial response to the surgery and those in which surgery was not done due to personal preference or some other reason, radiotherapy or medical treatment was offered. Radiotherapy was done either by fractionated External Beam Radiation (EBR) or Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) by gamma knife or cyber knife. Medical treatments employed were Octreotide LAR, Cabergoline and bromocriptine. The patient was considered to achieve remission when serum IGF-1 was within normal range and serum GH level was below 1.0 µg/l (2.5 mU/l)3,8 and partially cured when the levels of GH and IGF-1 had decreased but still above the normal range. Disease was considered controlled, when serum IGF-1 was within normal range with regular pharmacological management. Statistical analysis had been done using IBM SPSS statistics software version 22. The descriptive analysis of various variables had been presented for continuous variables as Mean (standard deviation) or median (inter-quartile range) and for categorical variables as numbers (percentages). The statistical tests used were independent sample T test and Chi square.

Out of 51, thirty-one were male and twenty were female patients. The median age was 32 years and average duration of symptoms was 3.5 ± 2.6 years. Descriptive analysis of important clinical variables and their differences in both genders is shown in Table-1.

 

 

Forty-seven (92%) patients received treatment with Trans-sphenoidal surgery, radiotherapy, pharmacotherapy or multiple modalities. Four patients did not opt for any treatment so they not being followed up. Twenty (42.6%) patients achieved remission and 27 (57.4%) patients have shown partial response to single or multiple modalities of treatment until now. Table-2 shows outcome of various modalities of treatment in both sexes.

 

 

GH burden was significantly less in patients with microadenoma. Out of 17 patients with microadenoma, 2 patients opted for TSS and both achieved remission after surgery. Two patients opted for radiotherapy and one of them have achieved remission.

Eight (15.7%) patients had Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism (HH) prior to treatment and 7(20.6%) developed HH after treatment. Five out of 47 (10.6%) patients developed anterior hypopituitarism after treatment, 4 after radiotherapy (1 after EBR and 3 after SRS) and one after TSS. Four out of 27 (14.8%) patients developed diabetes insipidus after surgery. Surveillance colonoscopy was done in 5 patients, 3 were found to have colonic polyps.

 

Discussion

 

Generally, Acromegaly affects both genders equally and the average age at diagnosis ranges from 40 to 50 years. Gigantism accounts for upto 5% of cases.4 Our cohort has male preponderance. Average age at presentation was 36.3 ± 14.8 years and average duration of symptoms was 3.47 ± 2.6 years, with no significant difference between two sexes. Liege Acromegaly Survey (LAS) database suggested the median age of diagnosis was 45.2 years and the median delay in diagnosis, in this database was 10 years for females and 8 years for males.5 More recent data suggests that this delay of acromegaly diagnosis can be now reduced to 3-6 years6 as we have seen in our study.

OSA in 27.5 % cases, was more common with advanced age and longer duration of symptoms. LAS database5 found sleep apnoea syndrome in 25.5% patients which they considered an underestimate. With strict polysomnography, Attal and Chanson found the rate of OSA to be 70%.7 Hypertension and plasma glucose abnormality were also positively correlated with age and duration of symptoms.

Seven patients had co-secretion of Prolactin but none of them had galactorrhoea. Two patients had co-secretion of thyrotropin with clinical thyrotoxicosis. Both were young men 15 and 23 years of age and had macroadenomas. A fifteen-year-old boy with gigantism had co-secretion of GH, thyrotropin and prolactin. He seemed to have an aggressive suprasellar tumour touching the optic chiasma, a behaviour that can be expected from a thyrotropinoma.8

Remission rate after surgery was not very good in our patients because most of the patients who opted for surgery had macroadenomas with suprasellar extension. TSS has better results in patients of acromegaly, with microadenoma or intrasellar macroadenoma.9 With pharmacological management, 45.4% patients on Octreotide LAR and 5.8% on cabergoline achieved normalization of serum IGF-1 levels. Poor compliance was a major problem, due to very high cost of octreotide LAR and availability issues with cabergoline. So, for achieving remission, after partial response to surgery, we relied on radiotherapy. With SRS, 8 out of 9 patients had achieved remission with a median follow up of about 2.5 years. In a recent analysis of 352 patients from the German Acromegaly Registry, who received Fractionated Radiotherapy (FRT) or Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS), 75% of patients are in remission or controlled after 10 years.10

 

Conclusion

 

In our cohort, the age at presentation was younger and duration of symptoms was short as compared to previous studies. After partial response to trans-sphenoidal surgery, we found radiotherapy especially SRS to be more effective in achieving normalization of GH/IGF-1 than pharmacotherapy, mainly because of inadequate use of somatostatin analogues due to their high cost, highlighting the importance of radiotherapy in achieving cure in acromegaly patients, in a resource limited environment.

 

Disclaimer: None to declare.

Conflict of Interest: None to declare.

Funding Sources: None to declare.

 

References

 

1.       Lugo G, Pena L, Cordido F. Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of acromegaly. Int J Endocrinol 2012; 2012: 540398.

2.       Rajasoorya C, Holdaway IM, Wrightson P, Scott DJ, Ibbertson HK. Determinants of clinical outcome and survival in acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1994; 41: 95-102.

3.       Dekkers OM, Biermasz NR, Pereira AM, Romijn JA, Vandenbroucke JP. Mortality in acromegaly: a meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008; 93: 61-7.

4.       Vilar L, Vilar CF, Lyra R, Lyra R, Naves LA. Acromegaly: clinical features at diagnosis. Pituitary 2017; 20: 22-32.

5.       Petrossians P, Daly AF, Natchev E, Maione L, Blijdorp K, Sahnoun-Fathallah M, et al.  Acromegaly at diagnosis in 3173 patients from the Liège Acromegaly Survey (LAS) Database. Endocr Relat Cancer 2017; 24: 505-18.

6.       Kreitschmann-Andermahr I, Siegel S, Kleist B, Kohlmann J, Starz D, Buslei R, et al. Diagnosis and management of acromegaly: the patient's perspective. Pituitary 2016; 19: 268-76.

7.       Attal P, Chanson P. Endocrine aspects of obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95:483-495.

8.       Ng HY, Namboodiri D, Learoyd D, Davidson A, Champion B, Preda V. Clinical challenges of a co-secreting TSH/GH pituitary adenoma. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep 2019; 2019: EDM190068.

9.       Melmed S, Bronstein MD, Chanson P, Klibanski A, Casanueva FF, Wass JAH, et al. A Consensus Statement on acromegaly therapeutic outcomes. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2018; 14: 552-61.

10.    Knappe UJ, Petroff D, Quinkler M, Schmid SM, Schöfl C, Schopohl J, et al. Fractionated radiotherapy and radiosurgery in acromegaly: analysis of 352 patients from the German Acromegaly Registry. Eur J Endocrinol 2020; 182: 275-84.

Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees: