November 2021, Volume 71, Issue 11

Short Communication

Ventricular-arterial coupling as a potential therapeutic target in diabetes

Sahrai Saeed  ( Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway. )
Hannes Holm  ( Department of Cardiology, Skane University Hospital, Malmo, Sweden. )
Peter Nilsson  ( Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Malmo, Sweden. )

Abstract

Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are at high risk of cardiovascular complications. Novel anti-diabetic medications such as sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) and Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) have been shown to possess cardiac and renal protective effects beyond their ability to lower plasma glucose. Use of SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA in patients with T2D and heart failure reduce cardiovascular risk and heart failure-related hospitalisations. SGLT-2i treatment has been shown to improve the long-term prognosis of patients with heart failure. Both drugs also have the potential to normalise ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC). VAC is the crosstalk between the left ventricular function and arterial system, and is an indicator of the global cardiovascular performance. In this overview, we will describe the concept of VAC and the features of diabetic cardiomyopathy, as well as VAC as a potential therapeutic target in diabetes by the use of novel anti-diabetic drugs, primarily SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA.

Keywords: Diabetes; sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors; Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists; Ventricular-arterial coupling.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.01279

 

Introduction

 

In patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), cardiovascular (CV) complications, particularly heart failure (HF), coronary events, and diabetic nephropathy are the major causes of mortality.1,2 For the management of these patients, a holistic approach is recommended. This involves strict control of plasma glucose, serum lipids as well as blood pressure. Weight loss and smoking cessation are advised, but not always achievable. CV outcome trials have shown that in patients with T2D and established CVD, or with multiple risk factors, treatment with new anti-diabetic drugs such as sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) and Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) reduce the risk of CVD and prevent HF-related hospitalisations.2 Therefore, the new 2019 joint European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) guidelines consider the use of GLP-1RA and SGLT-2i as class IA recommendation for patients with T2D and HF, or high CV risk.1 The CV protection is probably mediated to a large extent by improving the haemodynamic parameters and vascular structure and function, and reducing plasma volume, as well their direct beneficial effects on cardiac metabolism and function.1-4 SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA also have the potential to normalise ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC) and thereby improve central haemodynamics. Here, we will briefly describe the concept of VAC, arterial load and the features of diabetic cardiomyopathy, as well as VAC as a potential therapeutic target in patients with T2D by the use of novel anti-diabetic drugs, primarily SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA.

 

Ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC)

Traditionally, VAC is measured by echocardiography dividing effective arterial elastance (Ea) by end-systolic elastance (Ees) (Ea/Ees ratio).5 Ea is the arterial load imposed on the left ventricular (LV) and Ees reflects LV contractility. This concept is based upon the classical LV pressure-volume curve (Figure).

Ea is calculated as the ratio of end-systolic pressure (ESP) divided by stroke volume (SV) (ESP/SV), where end-systolic pressure is derived from brachial systolic blood pressure x 0.9. Ees is measured from ESP divided by end-systolic volume (ESV): ESP/ESV. Thus, VAC can be further simplified as ESV/SV. Recently, a European consensus document on the role of VAC in cardiac disease was published.5 A normal value for Ea was proposed as 2.2 (±0.8) mmHg∕mL and for Ees 2.3 (±1.0) mmHg∕mL. Accordingly, an Ea/Ees ratio close to 1.0 (between 0.7 and 1.0) indicates that LV and arterial system are optimally coupled and produce efficient stroke work. A ratio of >1.0 indicates sub-optimal VAC. Furthermore, novel methods, such as the ratio of pulse wave velocity (PWV) to global longitudinal strain (GLS) (Figure), have been proposed and seem to correlate better with subclinical target organ damage.5,6

 

Arterial load

Age is an important determinant of arterial load and ventricular stiffness. Age-related increase in central arterial stiffness (arteriosclerosis), unlike intimal calcification (atherosclerosis), is inevitable but slow and gradual. However, both arteriosclerosis and atherosclerosis can be accelerated by the presence of hypertension, obesity, T2D, and metabolic syndrome, leading to an early vascular aging7 and increased LV load, and affects LV function and morphology, independent of their shared effect on arterial load and subsequent LV remodelling. Although it is known that T2D is an important risk factor for increased arterial stiffness, the association, however, may be bidirectional. Recent studies have shown that increased arterial stiffness can lead to T2D and hypertension, and the risk remains significantly high even after adjustment for established CV risk factors.8

The individual components of CV risk factors such as elevated blood pressure and the circulating biomarkers, like plasma glucose and serum lipid levels may fluctuate over time, and the recorded values at the time of risk assessment may not accurately reflect the true CV risk burden in individual patients. However, arterial stiffness is considered a cumulative measure of previous exposure to CV risk factors, and represents an intermediate stage between exposure of CV risk factors and clinically overt CV event.7,9,10 Currently, the carotid-femoral PWV measured by an applanation tonometry is the gold standard for assessing arterial stiffness, and is an independent predictor of CVD and CV mortality, both in healthy and high-risk populations.9,10

 

The impact of diabetes on left ventricular function and structure

Diabetes, in addition to its strong association with arterial stiffening can also directly affect the heart. Diabetic cardiomyopathy refers to an increased cardiac chamber stiffness and increased LV filling pressure, diastolic dysfunction, LV hypertrophy and lower GLS and strain rate.11 Diabetic cardiomyopathy can be assessed by both echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance (MR). Cardiac MR-T1 mapping can, however, reveal early myocardial changes such as interstitial inflammation and fibrosis. It is to be noted that interstitial inflammation and fibrosis often precede reduced GLS (subclinical systolic LV dysfunction) and diastolic dysfunction.11 Furthermore, the presence of insulin resistance, increased fatty acid oxidation and reduced glucose uptake also affect cardiac metabolism adversely as a result of reduction in the energetic efficiency of LV myocardium.12

 

Ventricular-arterial coupling as a therapeutic target in diabetes

Novel antidiabetic drugs, such as SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA, in addition to their plasma glucose lowering effects, have also been documented to have cardio-protective effects, and seem to be promising therapeutic options in established CVD or in high-risk individuals. Both the drugs can also reduce glucose variability1 and have the ability to induce a small but significant blood pressure reduction.1 Particularly, SGLT-2i (gliflozins) promote glucosuria, reduce glucose toxicity and body weight, and increase natriuresis, as well as decrease blood pressure and arterial stiffness.3 However, how the interaction of GLP1-RA and SGLT-2i works with other antihypertensive drugs and affects CV prognosis is unknown.1

In patients with diabetes, these new drug classes reduce the risk of CV complications as a composite CV endpoint, including myocardial infarction, stroke, and CV mortality, but sometimes also total mortality.13,14 Of special relevance is the protective effect of the SGLT-2i on the risk of heart failure. The available evidence suggests that SGLT-2i reduce both preload (plasma volume contraction due to natriuresis) and afterload (blood pressure and arterial stiffness), and, hence, may improve subendocardial blood flow in patients with HF.3,15 Recently, Ikonomidis et al showed that in high-risk patients with T2D the use of GLP-1RA, SGLT-2i or a combination of both resulted in greater improvement of systolic LV function, as reflected by GLS, circumferential strain and myocardial work index derived from pressure-strain analysis, and a greater reduction in arterial stiffness derived from PWV.16 Interestingly, the combination of GLP-1RA and SGLT-2i showed the greatest improvement in VAC as assessed by PWV/GLS ratio. However, in a previous small randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study, GLP-1RA, liraglutide, had no effect on systolic LV function (EF, strain and strain rate) and on exercise capacity as reflected by metabolic equivalents in patients with newly diagnosed T2D and stable coronary artery disease (CAD).17 Notably, the authors did not assess VAC, and the small and selective sample (30 patients available for final analyses) with a shorter follow-up (12 weeks) might explain this apparent discrepancy with other studies. Furthermore, in a recent study of 44 individuals with T2D and preserved renal function, the SGLT2i Dapagliflozin showed protective effects on systemic and renal haemodynamics, by reducing stroke volume, vascular stiffness, and mean arterial pressure, without increasing the heart rate.18 It should be noted that this effect was independent of reducing plasma glucose. Hence, given the fact that there exists a bidirectional association between increased arterial stiffness and T2D and hypertension8 and that there is also a close relationship between CVD and renal disease,18 GLP-1RA and SGLT2i may be attractive therapeutic options in T2D with concomitant chronic kidney disease and diabetic cardiomyopathy due to their cardiorenal benefits, as well as their ability to restore VAC. Furthermore, most recently, it was shown that SGLT-2i treatment improved the long-term prognosis of patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction regardless of the presence or absence of diabetes.19

Finally, TD2 is present in approximately one-third of patients with stable angina, and in some patients CAD may even appear as a complication of T2D.20 Ranolazine and Trimetazidine, are effective anti-anginal drugs with ion- and metabolism-modulating properties, and have minimal or no effect on heart rate and blood pressure.21 Both agents have been studied in patients with T2D and stable angina, and reduce HbA1c, beyond their effect on angina. However, their effect on VAC should be explored in future studies.

 

Conclusions

 

There is growing evidence that novel anti-diabetic drugs, such as SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA, have cardio-protective effects, and seem to be promising therapeutic options in established CVD or in high-risk individuals. Besides their role in better glycaemic control and reduction of CV endpoints, they have additional favourable effects on HF and most likely on VAC. VAC reflects global CV performance and incorporates both arterial stiffness and subclinical myocardial function in its definition. SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA have the potential to slow or reverse diabetic cardiomyopathy and diabetic kidney disease, which are major causes of CVD and CV mortality.

 

Disclaimer: None.

Conflict of Interest: None.

Funding Disclosure: None.

 

References

 

1.      Cosentino F, Grant PJ, Aboyans V, Bailey CJ, Ceriello A, Delgado V, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD. Eur Heart J. 2020; 41:255-323.

2.      Seferović PM, Coats AJS, Ponikowski P, Filippatos G, Huelsmann M, Jhund PS, et al. European Society of Cardiology/Heart Failure Association position paper on the role and safety of new glucose-lowering drugs in patients with heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2020; 22:196-213.

3.      Scheen AJ. Cardiovascular Effects of New Oral Glucose-Lowering Agents: DPP-4 and SGLT-2 Inhibitors. Circ Res. 2018; 122:1439-59.

4.      Verma S, McMurray JJV. SGLT2 inhibitors and mechanisms of cardiovascular benefit: a state-of-the-art review. Diabetologia. 2018; 61:2108-17.

5.      Ikonomidis I, Aboyans V, Blacher J, Brodmann M, Brutsaert DL, Chirinos JA, et al. The role of ventricular-arterial coupling in cardiac disease and heart failure: assessment, clinical implications and therapeutic interventions: a consensus document of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Aorta & Peripheral Vascular Diseases, European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, and Heart Failure Association. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019; 21:402-24.

6.      Ikonomidis I, Katsanos S, Triantafyllidi H, Parissis J, Tzortzis S, Pavlidis G, et al. Pulse wave velocity to global longitudinal strain ratio in hypertension. Eur J Clin Invest. 2019; 49:e13049.

7.      Nilsson PM, Boutouyrie P, Cunha P, Kotsis V, Narkiewicz K, Parati G, et al. Early vascular ageing in translation: from laboratory investigations to clinical applications in cardiovascular prevention. J Hypertens. 2013; 31:1517-26.

8.      Muhammad IF, Borné Y, Östling G, Kennbäck C, Gottsäter M, Persson M, et al. Arterial Stiffness and Incidence of Diabetes: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Diabetes Care. 2017; 40:1739-45.

9.      Laurent S, Cockcroft J, Van Bortel L, Boutouyrie P, Giannattasio C, Hayoz D, et al. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J. 2006; 27:2588-605.

10.    Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, AgabitiRosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension. J Hypertens. 2018; 36:1953-2041.

11.    Tadic M, Cuspidi C, Calicchio F, Grassi G, Mancia G. Diabetic cardiomyopathy: How can cardiac magnetic resonance help? Acta Diabetol. 2020; 57:1027-34.

12.    Mancusi C, Losi MA, Izzo R, Canciello G, Manzi MV, Sforza A, et al. Effect of diabetes and metabolic syndrome on myocardial mechano-energetic efficiency in hypertensive patients. The Campania Salute Network. J Hum Hypertens. 2017; 31:395-9.

13.    Zelniker TA, Wiviott SD, Raz I, Im K, Goodrich EL, Furtado RHM, et al. Comparison of the effects of glucagon-like peptide receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors for prevention of major adverse cardiovascular and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2019; 139:2022-31.

14.    Elharram M, Moura CS, Abrahamowicz M, Bernatsky S, Behlouli H, Raparelli V, et al. Novel glucose lowering agents are associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular and adverse events in type2diabetes: A population based analysis. Int J Cardiol.2020; 310:147-54.

15.    Lytvyn Y, Bjornstad P, Udell JA, Lovshin JA, Cherney DZI. Sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibition in heart failure: potential mechanisms, clinical applications, and summary of clinical trials. Circulation. 2017; 136:1643-58.

16.    Ikonomidis I, Pavlidis G, Thymis J, Birba D, Kalogeris A, Kouasthana F, et al. Effects of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors, and Their Combination on Endothelial Glycocalyx, Arterial Function, and Myocardial Work Index in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus After 12-Month Treatment. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020; 9:e015716.

17.    Kumarathurai P, Anholm C, Nielsen OW, Kristiansen OP, Mølvig J, Madsbad S, et al. Effects of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist liraglutide on systolic function in patients with coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016; 15:105.

18.    Van Bommel EJM, Smits MM, Ruiter D, Muskiet MHA, Kramer MHH, Nieuwdorp M, et al. Effects of Dapagliflozin and Gliclazide on the cardiorenal axis in people with type 2 diabetes. J Hypertens. 2020; 38:1811-9.

19.    McMurray JJV, Solomon SD, Inzucchi SE, Køber L, Kosiborod MN, Martinez FA, et al. Dapagliflozin in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction. N Engl J Med. 2019; 381:1995-2008.

20.    Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S, Andreotti F, Arden C, Budaj A, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2013; 34:2949-3003.

21.    Ambrosio G, Tamargo J, Grant PJ. Non-haemodynamic Anti-Anginal Agents in the Management of Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Diabetes: A Review of the Evidence. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2016; 13:98-112.

 

Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees: