October 2021, Volume 71, Issue 10

Short Reports

Levels of physical activity and its association with antigravity muscles

Rizwana Butt  ( Department of Physiotherapy, Institute of Medical Rehabilitation (IMR), Islamabad, Pakistan. )
Wardah Hussain Malick  ( Department of Physiotherapy, Institute of Medical Rehabilitation (IMR), Islamabad, Pakistan. )
Sidra Kouser  ( Department of Psychology, Schellhammer Business School, Estepona, Spain. )
Danish Raouf  ( Department of Physiotherapy, Institute of Medical Rehabilitation (IMR), Islamabad, Pakistan. )

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the association of physical activity levels with the strength of antigravity muscles in medical students of Isra University, Islamabad. An analytical cross sectional survey was conducted on 200 medical students of Isra University, Islamabad, aged between 17-25 years. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire- Short Form 7 (IPAQ-SF-7) was used to determine the physical activity levels, while Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) was used for evaluating the strength of antigravity muscles. The mean age of the study participants was 21.27±1.784. Of the 200 participants, 155 (77.5%) were females and 45 (22.5%) were males. A significant association was found between physical activity levels and the antigravity muscles’ strength (p<0.001). This study concluded that physical activity levels were significantly associated with the strength of the antigravity muscles in medical students.

Keywords: Muscles, Muscle strength, Physical activity, Students.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.04-592

 

Introduction

 

Regular exercise is an essential part of a healthy lifestyle. In order to remain healthy and look credible to the patients, the medical professionals should maintain the recommended physical activity (PA) level.1 Physical activity is defined as any bodily movement produced by skeletal muscles that results in energy expenditure2 and can be classified into light, moderate, and vigorous PA based on its intensity.3 According to WHO, worldwide 23% of adults aged 18 years and above and 81% of adolescents aged 11–17 years are insufficiently active. Insufficient PA contributes to 3.2 million deaths each year.4

By consistently engaging in activities ranging from low intensity walk to increasingly vigorous games and resistance PA, the dangers of major cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and metabolic ailments, obesity, falls, intellectual decline, osteoporosis, and muscular weakness are diminished.5

Some previous studies have shown that medical students are physically more active than the general population,4 whereas other studies suggest that medical students have low PA levels because of high workload and less free time.1 The attitude of the medical students towards health maintenance, illness prevention, and exercise is one of the predicting factors of their health condition.4

Physical inactivity is often associated with a decrease in the strength of antigravity muscles which badly affects the joints and increases the risk of injury.6 Antigravity muscles help in maintaining posture, initiating movement, and keep the body upright against gravity, whether in sitting kneeling (tall kneeling or knee standing), quadruped or standing erect.7 The body is stabilised by postural mechanism against forces which shift the centre of mass, including limb movement, thus the action of antigravity muscles is responsible for maintaining posture. Postural adjustments, needed for anticipated movements, occur because of feedforward motor commands from motor cortex and cerebellum.8

In normal mature movement, extensor muscles are the main antigravity muscles, including the back muscle, proximal hamstrings, and quadriceps muscles.7 Trapezius, pectorals, latissimus dorsi, erector spinae, gluteus maximus, rectus femoris, gastrocnemius, tibialis, and soleus are also considered as antigravity muscles9 and are more susceptible to loss of muscle mass with immobility.6

Though studies have been conducted in the past on antigravity muscles and PA, no study has been conducted so far to determine the association of PA levels with the strength of antigravity muscles on the medical students of Pakistan. It is essential to determine this association because PA helps in preventing decline in antigravity muscle strength, power, and endurance, and thus prevents musculoskeletal disorders. Also, weakness in antigravity muscles has been seen to not only affect mobility, but also to cause such harmful effects as falling and fractures.10 Therefore, in order to prevent such episodes, it is imperative to determine this association. Furthermore, this study will help medical students in promoting healthy habits and in encouraging individuals to engage in regular PA by first being the role model themselves.

 

Patients/Methods and Results

 

An analytical cross sectional survey was conducted at the Isra University, Islamabad, among the medical students from November 2018 to February 2019. After approval from the ethical committee, informed consent from the participants, and assurance concerning the confidentiality of their data, a total of 200 medical students fulfilling the eligibility criteria were recruited through non-probability convenient sampling. The sample size was calculated through Rao Soft online software,11 with confidence interval of 95 per cent and margin of error 5 percent. The population size was 1,50012 and resultantly the sample size calculated was 306 students, who were approached to obtain the data. However, out of these 306 students only 200 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and showed willingness to participate in the study, and thus were recruited for participation.

The medical students included were in the age range 17-25 years and belonged to Isra University, Islamabad. However, students having a previous history of diagnosed musculoskeletal disorder, fracture less than six months old, history of systemic or metabolic diseases, amputations, carcinoma or those who had any diagnosed neurological or psychiatric disorder, were excluded from the study.

The International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form 7(IPAQ–SF–7) was used to determine the level of PA.3 The strength of the antigravity muscles was assessed through Manual Muscle Testing (MMT), a valid and reliable method for examining the muscle strength.13

A self-structured questionnaire was used to obtain the basic demographical data.

The data was analysed by using SPSS version 22. The association of PA levels with antigravity muscles’ strength was analysed by Spearman’s correlation test.

In the current study, 155 (77.5%) out of 200 participants were females, while 45 (22.5%) were males. The mean age of the students was 21.27±1.784 years. The mean BMI was 20.645±2.264 kg/m2. The mean height of the participants was 5.404±0.296 feet, and the mean weight was 57.12±8.236 Kg. An inverse relation was also observed between PA and BMI as shown in Figure.

Also, 22 (11%) out of the total 200 participants, were engaged in low level of PA, 73 (36.50%) participants were involved in moderate PA, and 105 (52.50%) participants were engaged in high level of PA since one week prior to reporting their data for this research.

It was also determined that the strength of left trapezius, pectoralis major, erector spinae, biceps brachii, L.D, gluteus maximus, quadriceps, hamstrings, tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius, and soleus was significantly associated with the levels of PA (p<0.001). This is in accordance with the findings of some previous studies which concluded that the levels of PA and muscle strength are significantly related to one another, and that a lack of muscle use can lead to a decrease in the muscle strength.14 The correlation between the PA levels and the strength of antigravity muscles is shown in Table.

Jeong UC et al. concluded in their study that low back pain, secondary lumbar segment damage, and physical disability is aggravated by disuse of or decrease in the activity of antigravity muscles for a prolonged time.15

 

Conclusion

 

The level of PA was significantly associated with the strength of antigravity muscles in the medical students of Isra University, Islamabad. It is suggested that the medical students should attempt to maintain adequate levels of PA as they advance towards graduation. This would be beneficial not only for their own health but it would also help them gain credibility with their patients..

The study’s limitation is that the sample size was not large enough and it was conducted at a single centre; both of these limit its generalisability. Future studies should be conducted on larger sample sizes with the inclusion of participants belonging to wider geographic locations for a better understanding of the process, and for making stronger inferences about its use by medical professionals and the general public.

 

Disclaimer: The manuscript was a part of our research project of Doctor of Physiotherapy programme at Isra University, Islamabad.

Conflict of interest: None.

Funding disclosure: None.

 

References

 

1.      Dabrowska-Galas M, Plinta R, Dabrowska J, Skrzypulec-Plinta V. Physical activity in students of the Medical University of Silesia in Poland. Phys Ther 2013; 93: 384-92.

2.      Butte NF, Ekelund U, Westerterp KR. Assessing physical activity using wearable monitors: measures of physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012; 44: S5-12.

3.      Meeus M, Van Eupen I, Willems J, Kos D, Nijs J. Is the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-short form (IPAQ-SF) valid for assessing physical activity in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome? Disabil Rehabil 2011; 33: 9-16.

4.      Wattanapisit A, Fungthongcharoen K, Saengow U, Vijitpongjinda S. Physical activity among medical students in Southern Thailand: a mixed methods study. BMJ Open 2016; 6: e013479.

5.      McPhee JS, French DP, Jackson D, Nazroo J, Pendleton N, Degens H. Physical activity in older age: perspectives for healthy ageing and frailty. Biogerontology 2016; 17: 567-80.

6.      Millis D, Levine D. Canine rehabilitation and physical therapy. USA: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2013, pp. 159

7.      Potter PA, Perry AG, Stockert P, Hall A, Peterson V. Clinical Companion for Fundamentals of Nursing-E-Book: Just the Facts. USA: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2016, pp. 790

8.      Longstaff A. BIOS Instant notes in neuroscience. Garland Science. New York: 2011; pp. 238

9.      Wright DB. Human physiology and health. 2nd ed. UAS: Heinemann, 2000; pp. 71

10.    Bowden Davies KA, Pickles S, Sprung VS, Kemp GJ, Alam U, Moore DR, Tahrani AA, Cuthbertson DJ. Reduced physical activity in young and older adults: metabolic and musculoskeletal implications. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab 2019; 10: 2042018819888824.

11.    RaoSoft Sample size Calculator. [Onlin] 2004 [Cited 2020 May 20]. Available from: URL: http://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html.

12.    Isra University, Islamabad Campus. [Onlin] 2009 [Cited 2020 May 20]. Available from: URL: https://isra.edu.pk/islamabad-campusintroduction/.

13.    Cuthbert SC, Goodheart GJ. On the reliability and validity of manual muscle testing: a literature review. Chiropr Osteopat 2007; 15: 4.

14.    Sandler H. Inactivity: physiological effects. 1st ed. USA: Elsevier, 2012; pp. 86-7

15.    Jeong UC, Sim JH, Kim CY, Hwang-Bo G, Nam CW. The effects of gluteus muscle strengthening exercise and lumbar stabilisation exercise on lumbar muscle strength and balance in chronic low back pain patients. J Phys Ther Sci 2015; 27: 3813-6.

 

Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees: