By Author
  By Title
  By Keywords

August 2021, Volume 71, Issue 8

Review Articles

The composition and stability of the vaginal microbiome of healthy women

Samar Megbal Alhabardi  ( Department of Biological Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. )
Sherif Edris  ( Department of Biological Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. )
Ahmed Bahieldin  ( Department of Biological Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. )
Rashad Rizk Al-Hindi  ( Department of Biological Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. )


Our knowledge of the composition of the vaginal environment in healthy women stands greatly improved. An imbalance in microbial communities is associated with a number of different diseases, disorders and other adverse health outcomes. Cultivation-independent studies have been published indicating that each woman has unique vaginal microbiota. The vaginal microbiome in pregnant women is more stable and associated with high level of Lactobacillus, particularly, Lactobacillus crispatus and low bacterial diversity. The current review was planned to provide a more complete picture of the abundance of various bacteria species in the vagina and how they impact women’s reproductive health and pregnancy outcomes. This should provide a better understanding of what is considered a “healthy” or “unhealthy” vaginal microbiome and how the dysibiosis of the vagina affects the women. Additionally, it was planned to identify factors that influence the structure and / or composition of the microbial community.

Keywords: Vaginal microbiome, VMB, Bacterial vaginosis, Community state types, CST, Lactobacillus, Preterm birth, Pregnancy.





Understanding the Human Microbiome

The definition of the human microbiome has been complicated by confusion related to the terminology. ‘Microbiome’ refers to the genetic material of the microbiota that lives in close association with humans and all of their genes.1 The term ‘microbiota’ refers to site-specific human bacteria that are associated with an environment and are revealed by 16s ribonucleic acid (RNA) sequencing.1 This microbiome has many benefits for the human body which is responsible for 40% of the host's energy intake as well as is important for the development of the host's immune system.2 However, any distribution in microbiome can result in disease.

Over the past decade, there has been an explosion of culture-independent technologies that have allowed for the classification of millions of bacterial species through the analysis of the sequence of marker genes.

Many studies have investigated the human microbiome in different biological states via 16s ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequencing. For example, Ley et al. discovered gut microbiome that revealed a significant diversity in the microbiota of obese3 individuals. Additionally, studies have described the microbiome in the oral cavity, vagina and skin using the 16s rRNA gene level.4-6


Vaginal microbiome of healthy women


A healthy vagina is typically defined as lacking symptoms of various infections, which results in good pregnancy outcomes. The vaginal microbiome (VMB) plays a critical role in the protection of the host from the growth of pathogenic bacteria.7 In addition, the VMB of mothers plays a critical role in the health of newborns.8 The VMB of healthy non-pregnant women is characterised by a variety of lactobacillus (L.) species (sp.) and many other organisms may be present in lower concentrations, including anaerobic and facultative anaerobic bacteria and candida sp. The lactobacillus sp. dominates this ecosystem with concentration of 106-107 colony forming unite (CFU) per gram of vagina fluid, and plays a key protective role by lowering the vaginal potential of hydrogen (pH) to 3.5-4.0 through lactic acid as a fermentation product, and creates an inhospitable environment for the growth of harmful bacteria. Moreover, lactobacilli also produce hydrogen peroxide (H2O2),  bacteriostatic and bacteriocidal compounds that can lower pH.9 There is a clear correlation between the pH value and the floral species detected in the cervicovaginal liquid.10 The loss of lactobacilli dominance results in bacterial vaginosis (BV), which is caused by abnormal proliferation of facultative and strictly anaerobic microorganisms and results in relatively high vaginal pH (> 4.5).


Species-level classification of VMB

Over 20 species of lactobacillus have been detected in the vagina.11 To data, healthy vagina is likely dominated by one or two lactobacillus species. Ravel et al. were the first to describe five community state types (CSTs) that are different in their microbial composition and abundance. The five main grades are L. crispatus, L. gasseri, L. iners, and L. jensenii (I, II, III and V) respectively, whereas other lactobacillus species are rare. CST IV lacks significant number of lactobacillus-higher diversity (Figure 1).12

Over 25% of women are a non-lactobacillus-dominated and are considered “normal” and healthy, though associated with high Nugent scores and higher pH. On the other hand, these women are prone to sexually-transmitted diseases, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), as well as preterm birth.

Prior cultivation-independent studies using molecular techniques have indicated that there no core vaginal microbiome common to all women; it largely differs by age and ethnicity. Several studies have shown significant difference in the vaginal microbiome in different ethnic groups. These studies demonstrated that Black and Hispanic women are more likely to be colonised with CST IV, whereas Asian and White women are more likely to be dominated by CST I and/ or CST II than any other lactobacillus species.13,14 However, many women lack appreciable vaginal lactobacilli without any health effects.

These findings were practically confirmed by Fettwreis et al. who compared the differences in VMB in African-American women with women of European ancestry using the largest African-American cohort to date (1,268 subjects, 960 of whom were not pregnant). African-American women were more likely to be dominated by L. iners and more likely to have higher bacterial diversity, whereas women of European ancestry were likely to be dominated with lactobacillus species CST I, II and V, and have lower bacterial diversity.15 This observation is important in understanding VMB composition and can help to protect a more fertile environment and develop appropriate treatments.


VMB in pathologic states

Bacterial vaginosis

BV may be defined by the disequilibrium in the vaginal microbiota and the microbial community composition shift from symbiotic to pathogenic (disease).16 Usually, treatment is conducted with antibiotics, such as clindamycin or metronidazole, but the treatment is often ineffective, with high rates of recurrent bouts. In women of childbearing age, BV is a common reproductive tract infection and has been observed in 15-30% of pregnant women. Moreover, it has been associated with serious health issues, including infertility, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), sexual-transmitted disease (STD) and increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.17 BV is usually diagnosed using the Amsel criteria in research setting18 and by gram-stain Nugent scoring in research and laboratory settings.19

Culture-dependent studies of BV demonstrate alterations in the composition and structure of vaginal microbial communities, including an increase in gardnerella, atopobium, mobiluncus and prevotella, with decreased lactobacilli.20 On the other hand, VMB community composition of many women was previously thought to have asymptomatic BV resembles, but is now recognised as normal VMB using the culture-based methods. Using culture-independent techniques, Fredericks et al.  confirmed the association of atopobium vaginac with BV, and identified three potentially BV-associated bacteria with unique 16s RNA sequences that could not be identified by culture-dependent studies. These are now known as BV-associated bacteria (BVAB) 1, 2 and 3.21

Using high-performing techniques, Ceccarani et al. compared the alterations that occur in the VMB during common genital infections.22 The shift from healthy to BV was strongly associated with increased abundance of L. iners mainly characterised by gardnerella, prevotella, megasphaera, roseburia and atopobium. L. iners is typically associated with dysbiosis of the VMB that leads to BV.23 However, the mechanisms for this species in vaginal health is unclear, and much attention is required to explore these since it can be detected in normal conditions as well as in another fingerprint of the ongoing dysbiosis in infectious conditions. At present, L. gasseri and L. crispatus have been associated with health,23 while L. gasseri and L. iners have negative connotations, suggesting that L. iners may be an opportunistic pathogen whose potential is enhanced by L. gasseri. More research is needed to investigate this relationship with the host.

In a small study, Lev-Sagie et al.  reported the benefits of vaginal microbiome transplantation, which entails the transplanting of vaginal fluids from healthy women to women with BV. A non-randomised trial of 5 women with intractable BV was conducted. Before the transplantation, all patients received a course of intravaginal antibiotics. The results revealed that four of the recipients showed long-term full remission, and one recipient had a partial remission. No adverse effects were observed in any of the patients.24 Changes in the VMB composition were confirmed with metagenomic sequencing. The results are striking and are likely to spur a significant amount of research in this area.

The presence of certain bacteria can indicate whether the vaginal tract is healthy or not. Research has revealed that BV appears to increase risk of the HIV acquisition due to altered pH, while treatment of BV may reduce the risk of HIV, especially where rates of HIV are very high. Moreover, behavioural, genetic and environmental factors are also likely to impact the effect of the VMB on HIV risk.  For example, using douches regularly that can change the vaginal pH have been reported to cause serious health problems, including increased risk of cervical cancer, PID and sexually-transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV.25


Physiological and environmental factors

Many studies have been performed to identify factors that may drive changes in the composition of the VMB. Age, pregnancy, sexual activity, number of sexual partners and smoking can affect the composition of the VMB.26

During the menstrual cycle, physiological changes occur that can impact the VMB. Numerous studies have assessed the stability of the VMB of healthy women throughout the menstrual cycle. Some women have vaginal microbial communities that appear to be more stable when oestrogen levels are at their highest, whereas other experience fluctuations timed with the menses.27 The high level of oestrogen causes a thickening of the vaginal epithelium and prompts the accumulation of glycogen and increased lactobacillus species. Molecular-independent techniques have shown that vaginal microbial community varied among women, and each woman’s VMB composition fluctuates throughout her reproductive lifespan (Figure 2).28

Furthermore, very few studies have compared the composition of the VMB of postmenopausal women who have received hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and those who have not.29-31 Notably, women not using HRT are less likely to be colonised with healthy lactobacillus species than those using HRT, and HRT greatly improves vaginal atrophy scores and decreases vaginal pH.

Smoking has been identified as one of the factors that influence the composition of VMB and can lead to BV and other genital infections and contributes to a reduction in vaginal lactobacillus, particularly L. crispatus.32 In 2014, the evaluation of the vaginal microbiota of smokers and non-smokers was first done. It followed changes in the vaginal microbiota over time in a pilot study of smoking cessation.33 Smoking was found to be associated with low proportions of lactobacillus species, and, during smoking cessation, vaginal microbiota shifted from lactobacillus-deficient CST to lactobacillus-dominated CST. This provided important preliminary data for future studies. However, larger studies are needed to confirm these findings and establish if smoking is causally related to BV.

Very little research has been conducted on the microbiome of semen and how the seminal microbiome influences the vaginal microbiome after sexual intercourse. Some researchers have suggested that specific sexual partners can cause BV. The seminal microbiome of individual men might influence the health of their partners  and the health of their offspring.34,35 Additionally, seminal microorganisms could influence pregnancy and miscarriage rates and be implicated in preterm births.36 However, the mechanisms for this are unclear, and further studies are required to confirm these findings. The first next-generation sequencing (NGS) study measured the seminal and vaginal microbiome pre- and post-intercourse in 23 couples.37 Seminal communities contained significantly fewer bacteria, but were significantly more diverse. Still, each shared many of the same bacteria, including lactobacillus, veillonella, streptococcus and atopobium. There was lower level of in the abundance of L. crispatus after intercourse. Interestingly, gardnerella (G.) vaginalis in women was related to inflammation in male genital tracts.


VMB during pregnancy

A growing body of research demonstrates that VMB in pregnancy, as characterised by new sequencing technologies, plays a critical role in both mother and neonatal health outcomes. In recent studies, the VMB during pregnancy has been examined in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. These studies confirm that the VMB becomes more stable during pregnancy and is associated with high levels of lactobacillus, particularly L. crispatus, and low bacterial diversity.38 The first longitudinal study, by Romero et al., compared the VMB composition of 32 non-pregnant women with 22 pregnant women who delivered at term, by analysing the taxonomic 16s rRNA. The study found that normal pregnant women maintain vaginal CSTs dominated by L. vaginalis, L. jensenii, L. crispatus and L.gasseri, and alpha diversity is decreased. In contrast with the non-pregnant, there are fluctuations between CSTs. Interestingly, L. iners was not significantly different between the two groups.38 However, large cohort is needed and further research is required to elucidate the correlation between the role of microorganism and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Ethical variations and geographical areas have shown significant differences in what constitutes the dominant vaginal organism.39

MacIntyre et al.  recently characterised the VMB of healthy pregnant women in the early weeks of gestation and compared it to those of non-pregnant women of similar ethnicities based on sequencing of the chaperonin (cpn)-60 universal target region.39 Microbiome profiles of pregnant women were clustered into six CSTs; I, II, III, IVC, IVD and V. This observation has been recently confirmed by Freitas et al. Notably, they identified several differences in the composition between the two cohorts’ higher lactobacillus abundance and less rich and diverse presence in healthy pregnant women.40 Another recent study evaluated if the VMB was different between women during the first trimesters of their first pregnancies and women during subsequent pregnancies. Remarkably, there was a marked decrease in L. crispatus and a concomitant increase in L. iners, L. gasseri and G. vaginalis in women with prior pregnancies.41

As mentioned previously, the distribution of vaginal bacteria CST appears to vary by population during pregnancy. Dysbiosis of the VMB is associated with an increased risk of post-abortal infection, and early and late miscarriages as well as preterm premature rupture of membranes and preterm birth.42-44


VMB during preterm birth

Preterm birth (PTB), defined as a birth-occurring delivery before 37 weeks of gestation, is one the most common single direct causes of neonatal deaths.45 PTB has multiple causes, including factors unrelated to the microbiota, such as age of the mother <20 or >35 years, STIs, obesity, short interpregnancy intervals, multiple gestations, Black ethnicity and tobacco and substance use.46,47 Over 90% of vaginal bacteria are uncultured and they play a critical role in PTB . The most prevalent species associated with PTB are ureaplasma (U.) urealyticum, mycoplasma (M.) hominis, bacteroides specie, G. vaginalis and Fusobacterium (F.) nucleatum. Ethnicity significantly influences the composition of VMB, with a higher risk in Black women compared to non-Black women.12 BV likely represents a dysbiosis, or abnormal restructuring of the VMB, and has been more strongly associated with PTB.12

At present, using culture-independent techniques to identify a cause of PTB within the VMB are similarly inconclusive. One of the first studies, by Nelson et al., reported that women with previous PTB, women with higher levels of leptotrichia/sneathia species, BVAB1 and megasphaera species in the first trimester of pregnancy have been considered risk factors to experience spontaneous PTB.48

A later study by DiGiulio et al. characterised the composition of the vaginal community microbial in 49 pregnant women’s duration of the pregnancy and tested the associations with complications of pregnancy, in particular PTB.26 The major finding was that there was inversely relationship between PTB lower abundance of lactobacillus, while positive relationship between abundance of gardnerella and ureaplasma. The study indicated that L. iners often coexists with G. vaginalis.  Studies have shown inverse correlation between G. vaginalis and L. crispatus via reciprocal interference in epithelial adhesion and biofilm formation.49,50 The relative abundance of L. iners is recommended as a mark of the dsybiosis of the vaginal microbiome and is identified as a risk of  PTB, but L. crispatus is not.51,52 For these reasons, L. crispatus is a key indicator of a healthy microbiome and may also be protective against PTB.

Recently, a study was conducted comparing the VMBs of pregnant women at low risk for PTB and women who delivered preterm to examine differences in the microbial richness, diversity and differential abundances of specific taxa by 16s sequencing. The results provide further evidence that VMB composition is associated with PTB: women who delivered preterm had decreased lactobacilli species abundance and an increased abundance of BV-associated taxa.53 Kindinger et al.  revealed that CST III is correlated more specifically with a risk of early PTB rather than late PTB. Furthermore, non-lactobacillus species or altered vaginal microbial community in the 13-27 weeks of gestation does not appear to contribute to PTB.54

As mentioned previously, the White race is more likely to harbour a lactobacillus-dominated microbiome, whereas the Black race is more likely to have a high diversity in the microbiome, but little to no lactobacillus and twice as likely to be diagnosed with BV and experience PTB. Thus, it is unclear whether dysbiosis in the vagina is an independent cause of PTB or merely an association.

Callahan et al.  conducted a case-control study in two cohorts of pregnant women: Caucasians had a low risk for PTB, and African-Americans experienced high risk. In both cohorts, L. crispatus was associated with a low risk of PTB, while increased abundance of prevotella was not.55 These findings have been recently confirmed and extended.

The characterisation of the normal vaginal flora can help to protect a more fertile environment and development-appropriate treatment. To understand the pathological events related to vaginitis, it is necessary to understand the normal vaginal flora versus that related to PTB. The study of microbiome will detect the type of pathogenic microorganisms. Besides, it will allow the possibility to detect the recovery rate of pregnancy outcomes. Further work is needed to study ethnic and other genetic differences to elucidate the causes of PTB and how bacteria are capable of interacting with the vaginal flora and host.


Looking to the Future

It is evident that the mode of birth affects a newborn’s microbiome composition. Large-scale epidemiological studies have reported that caesarean section (CS) can cause long-term health problems for infants, like asthma, allergies and other immune conditions, compared to babies born vaginally.56,57 Only one study reported that mode of birth could not affect a newborn’s microflora.58 However, different studies have confirmed the important role of vaginal delivery because it transfers positive bacteria strains to the infant. Crucially, a mother’s VMB may play an important role in lifelong microbiome composition and health. Newborns delivered by CS lack strains of gut bacteria present in those delivered naturally, and their guts harbour harmful microbes that are common in hospitals. Recently, Li et al.  found that different modes of birth delivery affect oral bacteria in healthy newborns.59

Several studies have investigated how to reduce this risk by restoring the microbiome of CS babies. Recently, Domingues-Bello et al. transferred maternal vaginal bacteria to the infants delivered by CS with vaginal fluids, transferring maternal vaginal bacteria to the newborn, to restore any missing microbes within 2 minutes of birth via a swab over the newborn’s body. The investigators found that, similar to vaginally-delivered newborns, skin, gut and oral microbiota during the first month was enriched within vaginal bacteria.57 However, the safety and effectiveness of these procedures are unproven. Longitudinal studies need to explore whether these changes have any effect on infants’ long-term health.

In 2019, a large-scale birth cohort study in the United Kingdom analysed gut microbiota using deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequencing and genomic analysis from nearly 600 full-term babies born in British hospitals. The study found that the mode of delivery had an effect on the infant’s gut microbes.60 Eventually, the microbiomes of CS babies shifted to become more similar to those of vaginally-born babies after they had been weaned.




The vaginal microbiome composition of women fluctuates from birth to menopause, and it differs greatly between women. The dysbiosis of the vagina affects the women during pregnancy. Research is needed to elucidate the influence of microbiome in reproductive health outcome for each woman.


Disclaimer: None.

Conflict of Interest: None.

Source of Funding: None.




1.      Cho I, Blaser MJ. The human microbiome: at the interface of health and disease. Nat Rev Genet 2012; 13: 260–70.

2.      Nicholson JK, Holmes E, Kinross J, Burcelin R, Gibson G, Jia W,  et al. Host-gut microbiota metabolic interactions. Science 2012; 336: 1262–7.

3.      Ley E, Turnbaugh J, Klein S, Gordon I.  Microbial ecology: human gut microbes associated with obesity. Nature 2006; 444: 1022–3.

4.      Anukam KC, Agbakoba NR. A comparative study of the oral microbiome compositions of healthy postmenopausal, premenopausal, and prepubertal Nigerian females, using 16s rrna metagenomics methods. Niger J Clin Pract 2017; 20: 1250-8.

5.      Virtanen S, Kalliala I, Nieminen P, Salonen A. Comparative analysis of vaginal microbiota sampling using 16S rRNA gene analysis. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0181477.

6.      Gao Z, Tseng CH, Pei Z, Blaser MJ. Molecular analysis of human forearm superficial skin bacterial biota. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2007; 104: 2927–32.

7.      Costello EK, Lauber CL, Hamady M, Fierer N, Gordon JI.  Knight R. Bacterial community variation in human body habitats across space and time. Science 2009; 326: 1694-7. 

8.      Dominguez-Bello MG, Costello EK, Contreras M, MagrisM, Hidalgo G, Fierer N, et al. Delivery mode shapes the acquisition and structure of the initial microbiota across multiple body habitats in newborns. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107: 11971– 5.

9.      Tachedjian G, O’Hanlon DE, Ravel J. The implausible “in vivo” role of hydrogen peroxide as an antimicrobial factor produced by vaginal microbiota. Microbiome 2018; 6: 29.

10.    Al-Rezaki A, Aldahmash W, Alwassel S, Abotalib Z. Assessment of the Microbiome collected from the reproductive tracts of women from Saudi Arabia and its potential influence on infertility. Adv Reprod Sci 2017; 5: 23–32.

11.    Angeles-LópezM, García-Cano RE, Aquino SC. Hydrogen peroxide production and resistance to nonoxinol-9 in Lactobacillus spp.isolated from the vagina of reproductive-age women. Rev Latinoam Microbiol 2001; 43: 171–6.

12.    Ravel J, Gajer P, Abdo Z, Schneider GM, Koenig SS, McCulle SL, et al. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011; 108: 4680–7.

13.    Zhou X, Brown CJ, Abdo Z, Davis CC, Hansmann MA, Joyce P, et al. Differences in the composition of vaginal microbial communities found in healthy Caucasian and black women. ISME J 2007; 1: 121–33.

14.    Zhou X, Hansmann MA, Davis CC, Suzuki H, Brown CJ, Schütte U, et al. The vaginal bacterial communities of Japanese women resemble those of women in other racial groups. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2010; 58: 169–81.

15.    Fettweis JM, Brooks JP, Serrano MG, Sheth NU, Girerd PH, Edwards DJ, et al. Differences in vaginal microbiome in African American women versus women of European ancestry. Microbiology (Reading) 2014; 160: 2272-82.

16.    Srinivasan S, Morgan MT, Fiedler TL, Djukovic NG, Raftery DH, Marrazzo JM. Metabolic signatures of bacterial vaginosis. mBio 2015; 6: e00204-15. 

17.    Shipitsyna E, Roos A, Datcu R, Hallén A, Fredlund H, Jensen JS, et al. Composition of the vaginal microbiota in women of reproductive age sensitive and specific molecular diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis is possible?. PLoS One 2013; 8: e60670.

18.    Amsel R, Totten PA, Spiegel CA, Chen KC, Eschenbach D, Holmes KK. Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am J Med 1983; 74: 14–22.

19.    Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol 1991; 29: 297–301.

20.    Nelson DB, Shin H, Wu J, Dominguez-Bello MG. The gestational vaginal microbiome and spontaneous preterm birth among nuliparous African American women. AM J Perinatol 2016; 33: 887-93.

21.    Fredricks DN, Fiedler TL, Marrazzo JM. Molecular identification of bacteria associated with bacterial vaginosis. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:1899–911.

22.    Ceccarani C, Foschi C, Parolin C, D' Antuono A, Gaspari V, Consolandi C, et al. Diversity of vaginal microbiome and metabolome during genital infections. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 14095.

23.    Stafford GP, Parker JL, Amabebe E, Kistler J, Reynolds S, Stern V, et al.  Spontaneous preterm birth is associated with differential expression of vaginal metabolites by Lactobacilli-dominated microflora. Front Physiol 2017; 8: 615.

24.    Lev-SagieA, Goldman-Wohl D, Cohen Y, Dori-Bachash M, Leshem A, Mor U, et al. Vaginal microbiome transplantation in women with intractable bacterial vaginosis. Nat Med 2019; 25: 1500-4.    

25.    Liebenberg LJ, Archary D, Sivro A, Kwon DS. Bugs, drugs, and HIV: the role of the vaginal microbiome in HIV risk and antiretroviral efficacy for HIV prevention. Genome Med 2017; 9: 74.

26.    Digiulio DB, Callahan BJ, Mcmurdie PJ, Costello EK, Lyell DJ, Robaczewska A, et al. Temporal and spatial variation of the human microbiota during pregnancy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2015; 112: 11060–5.

27.    Hickey RJ, Abdo Z, Zhou X, Nemeth K, Hansmann M, Osborn TW, et al. Effects of tampons and menses on the composition and diversity of vaginal microbial communities over time. BJOG 2013; 120: 695–704.

28.    Smith SB, Ravel J. The vaginal microbiota, host defence and reproductive physiology. J Physiol 2017; 595: 451–63. 

29.    Shen J, Song N, Williams CJ, Brown CJ, Yan Z, Xu C, et al. Effects of low-dose estrogen therapy on the vaginal microbiomes of women with atrophic vaginitis. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 24380.

30.    Mitchell CM, Srinivasan S, Zhan X, Wu MC, Reed SD, Guthrie KA, et al. Vaginal microbiota and genitourinary menopausal symptoms, a cross-sectional analysis. Menopause 2017; 24: 1160–6.

31.    Gliniewicz K, Schneider GM, Ridenhour BJ, Williams CJ, Song Y, Farage MA, et al. Comparison of the Vaginal Microbiomes of Premenopausal and Postmenopausal Women. Front Microbiol 2019; 10: 193.

32.    Nelson TM, Borgogna JC, Michalek RD, Roberts DW, Rath JM, Glover ED, et al. Cigarette smoking is associated with an altered vaginal tract metabolomic profile. Sci Rep 2018; 8: 852.

33.    Brotman RM, He X, Gajer P, Fadrosh D, Sharma E, Mongodin EF, et al. Association between cigarette smoking and the vaginal microbiota: a pilot study. BMC Infect Dis 2014; 14: 471.

34.    Reece AS. Dying for love: perimenopausal degeneration of vaginal microbiome drives the chronic inflammation-malignant transformation of benign prostatic hyperplasia to prostatic adenocarcinoma. Med Hypotheses 2017; 101: 44–7.

35.    Rando OJ, Simmons RA. I’m eating for two: parental dietary effects on offspring metabolism. Cell 2015; 161: 93–105.

36.    Kenny LC, Kell DB. Immunological tolerance, pregnancy, and preeclampsia: the roles of semen microbes and the father. Front Med 2018; 4: 239

37.    Mandar R, Punab M, Borovkova N, Lapp E, Kiiker R, Korrovits P, et al.  Complementary seminovaginal microbiome in couples. Res Microbiol 2015; 166: 440-7.

38.    Romero R, Hassan SS, Gajer P, Tarca AL, Fadrosh DW, Nikita L, et al. The composition and stability of the vaginal microbiota of normal pregnant women is different from that of non-pregnant women. Microbiome 2014; 2: 4.

39.    MacIntyre DA, Chandiramani M, Lee YS, Kindinger L, Smith A, Angelopoulos N, et al. The vaginal microbiome during pregnancy and the postpartum period in a European population. Sci Rep 2015; 5: 8988.

40.    Freitas  AC, Chaban B, Bocking A. Rocco M, Yang S, Hill JE, et al. The vaginal microbiome of pregnant women is less rich and diverse, with lower prevalence of Mollicutes, compared to non-pregnant women. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 9212.

41.    Nasioudis D, Forney LJ, Schneider GM, Gliniewicz K, France M, Boester A, et al. Influence of Pregnancy History on the Vaginal Microbiome of Pregnant Women in their First Trimester. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 10201.

42.    Lu H, Wang Q, Lu J, Zhang Q, Kumar P. Risk factors for intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants born at 34 Weeks of gestation or less following preterm premature rupture of membranes. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2016; 25: 807–12.

43.    Puri K, Taft DH, Ambalavanan N, Schibler KR, Morrow  L, Kallapur SG. Association of chorioamnionitis with aberrant neonatal gut colonization and adverse clinical outcomes. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0162734.

44.    Faure E, Faure K, Figeac M, Kipnis E, Grandjean T, Dubucquoi S, et al. Vaginal mucosal homeostatic response may determine pregnancy outcome in women with bacterial vaginosis: a pilot study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95: e2668.

45.    Tellapragada C, Eshwara VK, Bhat P, Kamath A, AlettyS, Mukhopadhyay C. Screening of vulvovaginal infections during pregnancy in resource constrained settings: implications on preterm delivery. J Infect Public Health 2017; 10: 431–7.

46.    Siqueira FM, Cota LOM, Costa JE, Haddad JPA, Lana ÂMQ, Costa FO. Intrauterine Growth Restriction, Low Birth Weight, and Preterm Birth: Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and Their Association with Maternal Periodontitis. J Periodontol 2007; 78: 2266-76.

47.    Ide M, Papapanou PN. Epidemiology of association between maternal periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes–systematic review. J Clin Periodontol 2013; 40(suppl. 14): 181–94.

48.    Nelson DB, Hanlon A, Nachamkin I, Haggerty C, Mastrogiannis D S, Liu C, et al. Early pregnancy changes in bacterial vaginosis-associated bacteria and preterm delivery. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2014; 28: 88–96.

49.    Castro J, Henriques A, Machado A, Henriques M, Jefferson KK, Cerca N. Reciprocal interference between Lactobacillus spp. and Gardnerella vaginalis on initial adherence to epithelial cells. Int J Med Sci 2013; 10: 1193–8.

50.    Castro J, Alves P, Sousa C, Cereija T, Franca A, Jefferson KK, et al. Using an in-vitro biofilm model to assess the virulence potential of bacterial vaginosis or non-bacterial vaginosis Gardnerella vaginalis isolates. Sci Rep 2015; 5: 11640.

51.    Vaneechoutte M. Lactobacillus iners, the unusual suspect. Res Microbiol 2017; 168: 826–36.

52.    Petricevic L, Domig KJ, Nierscher FJ, Sandhofer MJ, Fidesser M, Krondorfer I, et al.  Characterisation of the vaginal Lactobacillus microbiota associated with preterm delivery. Sci Rep 2014; 4: 5136.

53.    Hočevar K, Maver A, Vidmar Šimic M, Hodžić A, Haslberger A, Premru Seršen T, et al. Vaginal Microbiome Signature Is Associated With Spontaneous Preterm Delivery. Front Med (Lausanne) 2019; 6: 201.

54.    Kindinger LM, Bennett PR, Lee YS, Marchesi JR, Smith A, Cacciatore S, et al. The interaction between vaginal microbiota, cervical length, and vaginal progesterone treatment for preterm birth risk. Microbiome 2017; 5: 6.

55.    Callahan BJ, DiGiulio DB, Goltsman DSA, Sun CL, Costello EK, Jeganathan P, et al. Replication and refinement of a vaginal microbial signature of preterm birth in two racially distinct cohorts of US women. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2017; 114: 9966–71.

56.    Sevelsted A, Stokholm J, Bonnelykke K, Bisgaard H. Cesarean section and chronic immune disorders. Pediatrics 2015; 135: e92-8.

57.    Dominguez-Bello MG, De Jesus-Laboy KM, Shen N, Cox LM, Amir A, Gonzalez A, et al. Partial restoration of the microbiota of cesarean-born infants via vaginal microbial transfer. Nat Med 2016; 22: 250-3.

58.    Gasalbes MJ, Vallles Y, Ballester F, Llop S, Moya A, Francino MP. Meconium microbiota types dominated by lactic acid or enteric bacteria are differentially associated with maternal eczema and respiratory problems in infants. Clin Exp Allergy 2013; 43: 198-211.

59.    Li H, Wang J, Wu L, Luo J, Liang X, Xiao B. The impacts of delivery mode on infant’s oral microflora. Sci Rep 2018; 8: 11938.

60.    Shao Y, Forster SC, Tsaliki, E,  Vervier K, Strang A, Simpson N, et al. Stunted microbiota and opportunistic pathogen colonization in caesarean-section birth. Nature 2019; 574: 117–21.


Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees: