Objective: To determine the incidence of complications in elective surgeries and to grade them according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification System.
Method: The cross-sectional study was conducted in the General Surgery Operation Theatre of Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from February to April 2018, and comprised patients undergoing elective surgeries. Age, gender, region of surgery, type and grade of complications, were recorded using Clavien-Dindo Classification proforma. Data was analysed using SPSS 23.
Results: Of the total 212 patients, 36(16.9%) had some complication. There were significantly more complications in people aged 40 years or above compared to those <40 years (p<0.05). Of the total surgeries, 126(59.43%) were in the abdomino-pelvic region.
Conclusion: Peri-operative complications were found to be significantly related with age of the patient and the type of surgery.
Keywords: Classification, Peri-operative procedures, Operation theatres, General surgery, Quality of healthcare. (JPMA 71: 572; 2021)
A complication is defined as “any deviation from the normal post-operative course”.1 In the face of rising costs and limited resources, there is a demand for better healthcare delivery which calls for the need of quality assessment tool.1 According to the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery, 313 million surgeries are being carried out per year globally. While this seems like a huge number, <6% of these procedures are carried out in the poorer nations. Moreover, approximately 5 billion people do not have access to safe and affordable surgical care.2 With such huge number of surgeries taking place, the incidence of no surgical complication at all is highly unlikely. The complication rate is approximately 3-17% in most developed countries, but in Pakistan it is a lot higher with an even higher mortality rate.3,4 However, the risk of surgical complications is poorly characterised and there is no standard way of classifying the surgical complications.5
Different classification systems have been devised by hospitals to document the surgical complications, but there is no system used universally. This makes reporting and comparing the data among healthcare facilities difficult. A globally used standardised quality assessment system will make the data reproducible and may help in decreasing the preventable causes of surgical complications.6 The Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification shows promise in this regard as it has been used most frequently all over the world.7
It utilises a five-grade system that categorises the complications by the therapeutic modality used to treat that particular complication (Table 1).7
Literature review indicated there was no study conducted in Pakistan using CD classification to grade peri-operative complications in surgeries. The current study was planned to determine the incidence of complications in elective surgeries and to grade them according to CD classification.
Patients and Methods
The descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in the Surgical Operation Theatres 1-5 of Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from February to April 2018. After approval from the institutional ethics review committee of Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, the sample size was calculated using the sampling formula cited in literature.8 Confidence interval (CI) of 95% (Z=1.96) was assumed and absolute precision was set at 5% (d=0.05), while prevalence (P) of surgical complications of was taken as 16.4%.1 The sample was raised using non-random consecutive sampling technique and only included elective surgeries. Emergency surgeries and surgeries involving patients with co-morbidities were excluded. Data was recorded in a specially-designed proforma (Annexure).
The patients were followed by the anaesthetist on duty during the peri-operative and early post-operative period. The complications faced, if any, during this period were graded using the CD classification System.7 If more than one complication occurred, the highest grade was recorded. Data was analysed using SPSS 23. Descriptive analysis was done by calculating frequencies and percentages, and by cross-tabulations.
Of the total 212 patients, 93(43.9%) were males and 119(56.1%) were females. The overall mean age was 32.38±17.96 years. Of all the surgeries, 126 (59.43%) were abdomino-pelvic, 34(16.03%) head and neck, 22(10.38%) plastic, 19(8.96%) limbic, and 11(5.20%) were breast surgeries. Complications arose in 36(16.98%) cases; 18(50%) Grade I, 7(19.4%) Grade II, 6(16.6%) Grade IIIb, and 5(13.9%)Grade Iva (Table 2).
There were significantly more complications in those aged >40 years compared to those aged <40 years (p=0.029) (Table 3).
The difference in terms of gender was not significant (p=0.509) (Table 4).
The study was unique in the local context and its importance cannot be overestimated. In public hospitals, due to the huge number of patients, documentation is generally not done properly which may impact patient care in the long term. During the current study, it was noticed that post-operative notes were poorly kept and there was no set proforma for documentation. This was consistent with a study conducted in Karachi.9
The current study showed complication rate of 16.9% which was almost similar to a cohort study.1 This may be due to the fact that the current study included only elective surgeries in which complication rates are usually lower.
Grade I complications were most common, and there was no mortality. A similar trend was reported earlier.1 The current study also showed that patients aged >40 years had significantly increased risk of surgical complications. However, the cut-off was quite low compared to the studies that took older patients aged >65 years.10-13 This raises concerns and calls for improvement in surgical care as even the middle-aged patients were found to be at a greater risk of surgical complications. This data will be helpful in preparing for and predicting the outcome of surgeries in our patient population as these patients require more critical monitoring during peri-operative and the recovery period.
The current study showed non-significant complication distribution between the genders, but this result is in contrast to various other studies where one gender faced significantly greater risk of complications compared to the other.14,15 These results can vary by the type of surgery being performed. This might also be due to the fact that the current study excluded patients with co-morbidities.
The current study has some limitations. The possibility of under-reporting of minor complications cannot be denied. Also, data was limited only to elective surgeries in operation theatres of a teaching hospital where surgical environment and techniques are better. These results might not be applicable in the emergency surgeries or in peripheral hospitals where complication rates might be higher.
It is recommended that documentation of surgical procedures should be done more carefully and should encourage the use of grading surgical complications in all surgical setups. A table of CD classification may be added in the post-operative notes to aid in the documentation process.
Elective surgeries had lower complication rates and Grade I complications were most commonly observed. The complication rates were significantly higher among those aged >40 years.
Conflict of Interest: None.
Source of Funding: None.
1. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205-13.
2. Meara JG, Leather AJ, Hagander L, Alkire BC, Alonso N, Ameh EA, et al. Global Surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Lancet 2015; 386: 569-624.
3. Gawande AA, Thomas EJ, Zinner MJ, Brennan TA. The incidence and nature of surgical adverse events in Colorado and Utah in 1992. Surgery 1999; 126: 66-75.
4. Ahmed NI, Aurangzeb MA, Alam KH, Khitab NA, Zarin MO. Surgical audit with risk adjusted mortality rates using the POSSUM scoring system. Pak J Surg 2008; 24: 163-7.
5. Costas-Chavarri A, Meara JG. Need for a standardised procedure classification system in global surgery. BMJ Global Health 2016; 1: e000034.
6. Bosma E, Veen EJ, de Jongh MA, Roukema JA. Variable impact of complications in general surgery: a prospective cohort study. Can J Surg 2012; 55: 163.
7. AssesSurgery GmbH. The Clavien-Dindo Classification. [Online]. 2019 [Cited 2019 Jan 26]. Available from: URL: https://www.assessurgery.com/clavien-dindo-classification/.
8. Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW, Klar J, Lwanga SK. Adequacy of sample size in health studies. 1st ed. Chichester: Wiley; 1990.
9. Toor AA, Nigh-e-Mumtaz S, Saeed R, Yousuf M, Syeda A. Surgical Safety Practices in Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc 2013; 63: 76-80.
10. Mistry PK, Gaunay GS, Hoenig DM. Prediction of surgical complications in the elderly: can we improve outcomes. Asian J Urol 2017; 4: 44-9.
11. Tegels JJ, de Maat MF, Hulsewé KW, Hoofwijk AG, Stoot JH. Value of geriatric frailty and nutritional status assessment in predicting postoperative mortality in gastric cancer surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2014; 18: 439-46.
12. Zhou J, Yu P, Shi Y, Tang B, Hao Y, Zhao Y, et al. Evaluation of Clavien–Dindo classification in patients undergoing total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Med Oncol 2015; 32: 120.
13. Fagard K, Leonard S, Deschodt M, Devriendt E, Wolthuis A, Prenen H, et al. The impact of frailty on postoperative outcomes in individuals aged 65 and over undergoing elective surgery for colorectal cancer: a systematic review. J Geriatr Oncol 2016; 7: 479-91.
14. Brahmbhatt R, Brewster LP, Shafii S, Rajani RR, Veeraswamy R, Salam A, et al. Gender and frailty predict poor outcomes in infrainguinal vascular surgery. J Surg Res 2016; 201: 156-65.
15. Almasaudi AS, McSorley ST, Horgan PG, McMillan DC, Edwards CA. The relationship between body mass index, sex, and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing potentially curative surgery for colorectal cancer. Clin Nutr ESPEN 2019; 30: 185-9.